Parastomal hernia: A growing problem with new solutions

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 4-5, 2014, Pages 366-376

  Aquina, Christopher T ^a   Iannuzzi, James C ^a   Probst, Christian P ^a   Kelly, Kristin N ^a   Noyes, Katia ^a   Fleming, Fergal J ^a   Monson, John R T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Hernia; Parastomal hernia; Review

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INCIDENCE; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOMA; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INCIDENCE; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL STOMAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84920019929     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: 14219883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000369279     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Cromar CD: The evolution of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11: 256-280.
2. Devlin HB: Colostomy. Indications, management and complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1973; 52: 392-408.
3. Amussat M: Artificial anus formed with success in the ascending arch of the colon, without wound of the peritoneum. Prov Med Surg J (1840) 1841; 2: 444-445.
4. Arnison WC: Remarks on colotomy. Br Med J 1889; 1: 295-296.
5. Turnbull GB: Ostomy statistics: the $64,000 question. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49: 22-23.
6. Husain SG, Cataldo TE: Late stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21: 31-40.
7. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK: Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 916-920.
8. Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, et al: Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1885-1889.
9. Randall J, Lord B, Fulham J, Soin B: Parastomal hernias as the predominant stoma complication after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: 420-423.
10. Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M: Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 71-76.
11. Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, Aktan AO: Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1559-1563.
12. Ripoche J, Basurko C, Fabbro-Perray P, Prudhomme M: Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomy patients. J Visc Surg 2011; 148:e435-e441.
13. Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP: Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 416-418.
14. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH: Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London, Baillière Tindall, 1984.
15. Williams JG, Etherington R, Hayward MW, Hughes LE: Paraileostomy hernia: a clinical and radiological study. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 1355-1357.
16. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, et al: The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 173-177.
17. Caricato M, Ausania F, Ripetti V, et al: Retrospective analysis of long-term defunctioning stoma complications after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 559-561.
18. Murrell ZA, Dixon MR, Vargas H, et al: Contemporary indications for and early outcomes of abdominoperineal resection. Am Surg 2005; 71: 837-840.
19. Devlin HB, Kingsnorth AN: Parastomal Hernia; in Devlin HB, Kingsnorth AN (eds): Management of abdominal hernias, ed 2. London, Butterworths, 1998, pp 257-266.
20. Gurmu A, Matthiessen P, Nilsson S, et al: The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 89-95.
21. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA: Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 784-793.
22. Makela JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST: Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1997; 86: 305-310.
23. Rodriguez Faba O, Rosales A, Breda A, et al: Simplified technique for parastomal hernia repair after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit creation. Urology 2011; 77: 1491-1494.
24. Farnham SB, Cookson MS: Surgical complications of urinary diversion. World J Urol 2004; 22: 157-167.
25. Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A, et al: Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 2007; 178: 950-954.
26. Wood DN, Allen SE, Hussain M, et al: Stomal complications of ileal conduits are significantly higher when formed in women with intractable urinary incontinence. J Urol 2004; 172: 2300-2303.
27. Szymanski KM, St-Cyr D, Alam T, Kassouf W: External stoma and peristomal complications following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion: a systematic review. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010; 56: 28-35.
28. Mylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, et al: Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 334-337.
29. Hong SY, Oh SY, Lee JH, et al: Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition. J Korean Surg Soc 2013; 84: 43-47.
30. De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y: Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1806-1809.
31. Funahashi K, Suzuki T, Nagashima Y, et al: Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy. Surg Today 2014; 44: 1465-1469.
32. Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, et al: Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 963-969.
33. Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, et al: Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 59-64.
34. Hotouras A, Murphy J, Power N, et al: Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture? Int J Surg 2013; 11: 425-427.
35. Goligher JC: Extraperitoneal colostomy or ileostomy. Br J Surg 1958; 46: 97-103.
36. Sames CP: Extraperitoneal colostomy. Lancet 1958; 1: 567-568.
37. Sjodahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T: Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 339-341.
38. Hardt J, Meerpohl JJ, Metzendorf MI, et al: Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11:CD009487.
39. Kald A, Juul KN, Hjortsvang H, Sjodahl RI: Quality of life is impaired in patients with peristomal bulging of a sigmoid colostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 627-633.
40. Martin L, Foster G: Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 81-84.
41. Sjodahl RI, Thorelius L, Hallbook OJ: Ultrasonographic findings in patients with peristomal bulging. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 745-749.
42. Gurmu A, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K: Imaging of parastomal hernia using three-dimensional intrastomal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1026-1029.
43. Strigard K, Gurmu A, Nasvall P, et al: Intrastomal 3D ultrasound; an inter-and intra-observer evaluation. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013; 28: 43-47.
44. Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Boetto R, et al: Diverting loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy: predictors of poor outcome and poor quality of life. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 914-920.
45. Kane M, McErlean D, McGrogan M, et al: Clinical protocols for stoma care: 6. Management of parastomal hernia. Nurs Stand 2004; 18: 43-44.
46. Herbe L: The ostomy files: getting the right body fit. Ostomy Wound Management 2012; 58: 12.
47. Meisner S, Lehur PA, Moran B, et al: Peristomal skin complications are common, expensive, and difficult to manage: a population based cost modeling study. PLoS One 2012; 7:e37813.
48. Richbourg L, Fellows J, Arroyave WD: Ostomy pouch wear time in the United States. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2008; 35: 504-508.
49. Johnson C: Making sure patients have the ostomy supplies they need. Wound Care Advisor 2013; 2: 28-29.
50. Erwin-Toth P, Thompson SJ, Davis JS: Factors impacting the quality of life of people with an ostomy in North America: results from the Dialogue Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2012; 39: 417-422; quiz 423-424.
51. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, et al: Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 1265-1272.
52. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB: Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 1994; 129: 413-418; discussion 418-419.
53. Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Millan MM, Hammel JP: Surgery of recurrent parastomal hernia: direct repair or relocation? Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 681-686.
54. Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY: Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 266-270.
55. Botet X, Boldo E, Llaurado JM: Colonic parastomal hernia repair by translocation without formal laparotomy. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 981.
56. Rosin JD, Bonardi RA: Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20: 299-302.
57. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN: Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia. Hernia 2001; 5: 110-112.
58. Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE: The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80: 184-187.
59. Hansson BM, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh IH: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1456-1459.
60. Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, et al: Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15: 1252-1258.
61. Peppas G, Gkegkes ID, Makris MC, Falagas ME: Biological mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of the clinical evidence. Am Surg 2010; 76: 1290-1299.
62. Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, et al: Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 991-998.
63. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al: Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 685-695.
64. Mavros MN, Athanasiou S, Alexiou VG, et al: Risk factors for mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. World J Surg 2011; 35: 2389-2398.
65. Muysoms F: Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias with a modified Sugarbaker technique. Acta Chir Belg 2007; 107: 476-480.
66. Berger D, Bientzle M: Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon's experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 1668-1673.
67. Berger D, Bientzle M: Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients. Hernia 2009; 13: 167-172.
68. Asif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, et al: Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3430-3434.
69. Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T, et al: The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 494-500.
70. Mizrahi H, Bhattacharya P, Parker MC: Laparoscopic slit mesh repair of parastomal hernia using a designated mesh: long-term results. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 267-270.
71. Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Carmichael JC, et al: Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of shortterm outcomes. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4067-4072.
72. Pastor DM, Pauli EM, Koltun WA, et al: Parastomal hernia repair: a single center experience. JSLS 2009; 13: 170-175.
73. Rieger N, Moore J, Hewett P, et al: Parastomal hernia repair. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 203-205.
74. Venditti D, Gargiani M, Milito G: Parastomal hernia surgery: personal experience with use of polypropylene mesh. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5: 85-88.
75. Ho KM, Fawcett DP: Parastomal hernia repair using the lateral approach. BJU Int 2004; 94: 598-602.
76. de Ruiter P, Bijnen AB: Ring-reinforced prosthesis for paracolostomy hernia. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 152-156.
77. Luning TH, Spillenaar-Bilgen EJ: Parastomal hernia: complications of extra-peritoneal onlay mesh placement. Hernia 2009; 13: 487-490.
78. Kald A, Landin S, Masreliez C, Sjodahl R: Mesh repair of parastomal hernias: new aspects of the Onlay technique. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5: 169-171.
79. Steele SR, Lee P, Martin MJ, et al: Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe? Am J Surg 2003; 185: 436-440.
80. Longman RJ, Thomson WH: Mesh repair of parastomal hernias-a safety modification. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 292-294.
81. Guzman-Valdivia G, Guerrero TS, Laurrabaquio HV: Parastomal hernia-repair using mesh and an open technique. World J Surg 2008; 32: 465-470.
82. Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V: The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 186-188.
83. Byers JM, Steinberg JB, Postier RG: Repair of parastomal hernias using polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 1246-1247.
84. Fei Y: A modified sublay-keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair. Surg Today 2012; 42: 842-847.
85. van Sprundel TC, Gerritsen van der Hoop A: Modified technique for parastomal hernia repair in patients with intractable stoma-care problems. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 445-449.
86. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K: Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 185-191.
87. Wara P, Andersen LM: Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using a bilayer mesh with a slit. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 526-530.
88. Craft RO, Huguet KL, McLemore EC, Harold KL: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2008; 12: 137-140.
89. LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE, Whitaker JM, Hausmann MG: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2005; 9: 140-144.
90. Safadi B: Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: early results. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 676-680.
91. Muysoms EE, Hauters PJ, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al: Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 2008; 108: 400-404.
92. Mancini GJ, McClusky DA 3rd, Khaitan L, et al: Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1487-1491.
93. Bayer I, Kyzer S, Chaimoff C: A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986; 163: 579-580.
94. Gogenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, et al: Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1131-1135.
95. Israelsson LA: Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 2005; 29: 1086-1089.
96. Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G: Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 672-675.
97. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R: A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 931-936.
98. Hauters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M, et al: Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation. Hernia 2012; 16: 655-660.
99. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al: Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 583-587.
100. Vijayasekar C, Marimuthu K, Jadhav V, Mathew G: Parastomal hernia: is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12: 309-313.
101. Lopez-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, et al: Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia 2012; 16: 661-667.
102. Hammond TM, Huang A, Prosser K, et al: Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study. Hernia 2008; 12: 475-481.
103. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA: Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 2009; 33: 118-121; discussion 122-123.
104. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA: Experiences with a prophylactic mesh in 93 consecutive ostomies. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1637-1640.
105. Berger D: Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST). Hernia 2008; 12: 243-246.
106. Lee L, Saleem A, Landry T, et al: Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 82-91.
107. Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, V-Haaren-de Haan H, et al: PREVENTion of a parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh in patients undergoing permanent end-colostomy; the PREVENT-trial: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012; 13: 226.
108. Blackberg M: Prophylactic mesh in urostomies-does it help to prevent stoma hernia? London, Current Controlled Trials, 2013.