Deontology

The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  McNaughton, David ^a   Rawling, Piers ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent neutrality; Agent relativity; Consequentialism; Contractualism; Deontology; Moral constraints; Moral principle; Option; Particularism; Special relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920003385     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/0195147790.003.0016     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adams, R. 1976. "Motive Utilitarianism." Journal of Philosophy 73: 467-481.
2. Arneson, R. 2003. "Consequentialism versus Special-Ties Partiality." Monist 86: 382-401.
3. Audi, R. 1996. "Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics." In Sinnott-Armstrong and Timmons, 1996, 101-136.
4. Blackburn, S. 1999. "Am I Right?" New York Times, February 21.
5. Brook, R. 1991. "Agency and Morality." Journal of Philosophy 88: 190-212.
6. Crisp, R., and M. Slote, eds. 1997. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Copp, D. 1979. "The Iterated-Utilitarianism of J. S. Mill." Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp., 5: 75-98.
8. Copp, D. 1995. Morality, Normativity and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Copp, D. 1997. "Does Moral Theory Need the Concept of Society?" Analyse und Kritik 19: 189-212.
10. Dancy, J. 1983. "Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties." Mind 92: 530-547.
11. Dancy, J. 1993a. "An Ethic of Prima Facie Duties." In Singer, 1993, 230-240.
12. Dancy, J. 1993b. Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Darwall, S. 1986. "Agent-Centered Restrictions from the Inside Out." Philosophical Studies 50: 291-319.
14. Driver, J. 2001. Uneasy Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Hooker, B. 2000. Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Hooker, B. 1994. "Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?" Analysis 54: 62-67.
19. Hooker, B., and M. Little, eds. 2000. Moral Particularism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Howard-Snyder, F. 1993. "Rule Consequentialism Is a Rubber Duck." American Philosophical Quarterly 30: 271-278.
21. Hurka, T. 2001. Virtue, Vice and Value. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Hursthouse, R. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Kagan, S. 1984. "Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much?" Philosophy and Public Affairs 13: 239-254.
24. Kagan, S. 1989. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Kamm, F. 1989. "Harming Some to Save Others." Philosophical Studies 57: 227-260.
26. Kamm, F. 1992. "Non-Consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status." Philosophy and Public Affairs 21: 381-389.
27. Kamm, F. 2000. "Nonconsequentialism." In Lafollette, 2000, 205-226.
28. Kant, I. [1785]. 1993. Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals Trans. J. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.
29. Korsgaard, C. M. 1996a. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Korsgaard, C. M. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lafollette, H. 2000. The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. McGinn, C. 1999. "Reasons and Unreasons." New Republic, May 24, 34-38.
33. McNaughton, D. 1988. Moral Vision. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. McNaughton, D. 1996. "An Unconnected Heap of Duties?" Philosophical Quarterly 46:433-447.
35. McNaughton, D., and P. Rawling. 1991. "Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction." Philosophical Studies 63: 167-185.
36. McNaughton, D. 1993. "Deontology and Agency." Monist 76: 81-100.
37. McNaughton, D. 1998. "On Defending Deontology." Ratio 11: 37-54.
38. McNaughton, D. 2000. "Unprincipled Ethics." In Hooker and Little, 2000, 256-275.
39. McNaughton, D. 2003a. "Can Scanlon Avoid Redundancy by Passing the Buck?" Analysis 63: 328-331.
40. McNaughton, D. 2003b. "Naturalism and Normativity." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp., 77: 23-45.
41. Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Nagel, T. 1995. "Personal Rights and Public Space." Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: 83-107.
43. Parfit, D. 1987. Reasons and Persons. Rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Pettit, Philip. 1993. The Common Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Quinn, W. 1993. Morality and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Rachels, J., ed. 1998. Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Railton, P. 1988. "Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality." In Scheffler, 1988, 93-133.
48. Regan, D. 1980. Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Ridge, M. 2001. "Saving Scanlon: Contractualism and Agent-Relativity." Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 472-581.
50. Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
52. Scanlon, T. 2002. "Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance." Ethics 112: 507-528.
53. Scheffler, S. 1994. The Rejection of Consequentialism. Rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
54. Scheffler, S., ed. 1988. Consequentialism and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Singer, P., ed. 1993. A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
56. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., and M. Timmons, eds. 1996. Moral Knowledge: New Readings in Moral Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Smart, J. J. C. 1998. "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism." In Rachels, 1998, 286-297.
58. Smart, J. J. C., and B. Williams. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
59. Stratton-Lake, P. 2003. "Scanlon's Contractualism and the Redundancy Objection." Analysis 63: 70-76.