On defending deontology

Ratio

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-54

  McNaughton, David ^a   Rawling, Piers ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949230403     PISSN: 00340006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9329.00050     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dancy, J. (1993) Moral Reasons (Oxford: Blackwell)
2. Dreier, J. (1993) 'Structures of Normative Theories' The Monist 76(1), 22-40
3. Hooker, B. (1994) 'Is Rule Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?' Analysis 54(2), 92-97
4. Howard-Snyder, F. (1993) 'Rule Consequentialism is a Rubber Duck' American Philosophical Quarterly 30(3), 271-278
5. Kamm, F.M. (1989) 'Harming Some to Save Others' Philosophical Studies 57, 227-260
6. Kamm, F.M. (1992) 'Non-consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status' Philosophy & Public Affairs 21, 381-389
7. McNaughton, D., and Rawling, P. (1991) 'Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction' Philosophical Studies 63, 167-185
8. Nagel, T. (1986) The View From Nowhere (Oxford University Press)
9. Nagel, T. (1995) 'Personal Rights and Public Space' Philosophy & Public Affairs 24(2), 83-107
10. Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
11. Quinn, W. (1993) Morality and Action (Cambridge University Press)
12. Railton, P. (1984) 'Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality' Philosophy & Public Affairs 13(2), 134-171
13. Regan, D. (1980) Utilitarianism and Co-operation (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
14. Ross, W.D. (1965) The Right and The Good (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
15. Scheffler, S. (1982) The Rejection of Consequentialism (Oxford: Clarendon Press)