Intuitions in Moral Inquiry

The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  DePaul, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Intuition; Moral concepts; Moral inquiry; Moral intuition; Reflective equilibrium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919983444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/0195147790.003.0022     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Alston, W. 1993. The Reliability of Sense Perception. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
2. Audi, R. 1997. "Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics." In Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character, 32-65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Audi, R. 2004. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
4. Bealer, G. 1998. "Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy." In Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuitions and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry, ed. M. DePaul and W. Ramsey, 201-239. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Daniels, N. 1979. "Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics." Journal of Philosophy 76: 256-282.
7. Daniels, N. 1980. "On Some Methods of Ethics and Linguistics." Philosophical Studies 37:21-36.
8. DePaul, M. 1987. "Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics." Mind 96: 463-481.
9. DePaul, M. 1993. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherentism in Moral Inquiry. London: Routledge.
10. DePaul, M. 1998. "Why Bother with Reflective Equilibrium?" In Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuitions and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry, ed. M. DePaul and W. Ramsey, 293-309. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
11. Fumerton, R. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
12. Goldman, A., and J. Pust. 1998. "Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence." In Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuitions and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry, ed. M. DePaul and W. Ramsey, 179-197. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
13. Goodman, N. 1955. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
14. Hare, R. 1973. "Rawls' Theory of Justice." Pt. 1. Philosophical Quarterly 23: 144-155.
15. Harman, G. 1999. "Moral Philosophy and Linguistics." In Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 1, Ethics, ed. Klaus Brinkmann, 107-115. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation Center, Bowling Green State University.
16. Hooker, B., and M. Little, eds. 2000. Moral Particularism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Kant, I. 1993. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals with On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns. 3rd ed. Trans. J. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.
18. Moore, G. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Prichard, H. 1912. "Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?" Mind 21: 21-37.
20. Plato. 1992. Republic. Trans. G. M. A. Grube and C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett.
21. Pollock, J. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
22. Rawls, J. 1951. "Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics." Philosophical Review 60:184-186.
23. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
24. Rey, G. 1983. "Concepts and Stereotypes." Cognition 15: 237-262.
25. Ross, W. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.
27. Singer, P. 1974. "Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium." Monist 58: 490-517.
28. Sosa, E. 1998. "Minimal Intuition." In Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuitions and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry, ed. M. DePaul and W. Ramsey, 257-269. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
29. Thomson, J. 1971. "A Defense of Abortion." Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 47-66.