Effect of steriles states on lepton magnetic moments and neutrinoless double beta decay

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1-27

  Abada, A ^a   De Romeri, V ^b   Teixeira, A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b CENTRE DE CALCUL DE L INSTITUT NATIONAL DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET DE PHYSIQUE DES PARTICULES   (France)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Neutrino Physics; Rare Decays

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919910910     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)074     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. T. Mueller et al., Improved predictions of reactor antineutrino spectra, Phys. Rev.C 83 (2011) 054615 [arXiv:1101.2663] [INSPIRE].
2. P. Huber, On the determination of anti-neutrino spectra from nuclear reactors, Phys. Rev.C 84 (2011) 024617 [Erratum ibid.C 85 (2012) 029901] [arXiv:1106.0687] [INSPIRE].
3. G. Mention et al., The reactor antineutrino anomaly, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 073006 [arXiv:1101.2755] [INSPIRE].
4. LSND collaboration, A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino(electron) appearance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 112007 [hep-ex/0104049] [INSPIRE].
5. 2scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 231801 [arXiv:0704.1500] [INSPIRE].
6. MiniBooNE collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Event excess in the MiniBooNE search forν¯μ→ν¯e$$ {\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\to {\overline{\nu}}_e $$oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 181801 [arXiv:1007.1150] [INSPIRE].
7. MiniBooNE collaboration, A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Improved search forν¯μ→ν¯e$$ {\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\to {\overline{\nu}}_e $$oscillations in the MiniBooNE experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 161801 [arXiv:1207.4809] [INSPIRE].
8. eandν¯e$$ {\overline{\nu}}_e $$disappearance from Gallium and reactor experiments, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 073009 [arXiv:0711.4222] [INSPIRE].
9. C. Giunti and M. Laveder, Statistical significance of the gallium anomaly, Phys. Rev.C 83 (2011) 065504 [arXiv:1006.3244] [INSPIRE].
10. A. Kusenko, Sterile neutrinos: the dark side of the light fermions, Phys. Rept.481 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0906.2968] [INSPIRE].
11. K.N. Abazajian et al., Light sterile neutrinos: a white paper, arXiv:1204.5379 [INSPIRE].
12. J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev.D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
13. M. Gronau, C.N. Leung and J.L. Rosner, Extending limits on neutral heavy leptons, Phys. Rev.D 29 (1984) 2539 [INSPIRE].
14. A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis, Flavor violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models, Nucl. Phys.B 437 (1995) 491 [hep-ph/9403398] [INSPIRE].
15. F. Deppisch and J.W.F. Valle, Enhanced lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw model, Phys. Rev.D 72 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0406040] [INSPIRE].
16. E. Arganda, M.J. Herrero, X. Marcano and C. Weiland, Imprints of massive ISS neutrinos in LFV Higgs decays, arXiv:1405.4300 [INSPIRE].
17. E. Arganda, M.J. Herrero, X. Marcano and C. Weiland, Lepton flavour violating Higgs decays, arXiv:1406.0384 [INSPIRE].
18. R.E. Shrock, New tests for and bounds on, neutrino masses and lepton mixing, Phys. Lett.B 96 (1980) 159 [INSPIRE].
19. R.E. Shrock, General theory of weak leptonic and semileptonic decays. 1. Leptonic pseudoscalar meson decays, with associated tests for and bounds on, neutrino masses and lepton mixing, Phys. Rev.D 24 (1981) 1232 [INSPIRE].
20. E. Nardi, E. Roulet and D. Tommasini, Limits on neutrino mixing with new heavy particles, Phys. Lett.B 327 (1994) 319 [hep-ph/9402224] [INSPIRE].
21. π, JHEP02 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1211.3052] [INSPIRE].
22. A. Abada, A.M. Teixeira, A. Vicente and C. Weiland, Sterile neutrinos in leptonic and semileptonic decays, JHEP02 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1311.2830] [INSPIRE].
23. E. Akhmedov, A. Kartavtsev, M. Lindner, L. Michaels and J. Smirnov, Improving electro-weak fits with TeV-scale sterile neutrinos, JHEP05 (2013) 081 [arXiv:1302.1872] [INSPIRE].
24. P.S. Bhupal Dev, R. Franceschini and R.N. Mohapatra, Bounds on TeV seesaw models from LHC Higgs data, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 093010 [arXiv:1207.2756] [INSPIRE].
25. A. Das, P.S. Bhupal Dev and N. Okada, Direct bounds on electroweak scale pseudo-Dirac neutrinos froms$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV LHC data, Phys. Lett.B 735 (2014) 364 [arXiv:1405.0177] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Das and N. Okada, Inverse seesaw neutrino signatures at the LHC and ILC, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 113001 [arXiv:1207.3734] [INSPIRE].
27. C.G. Cely, A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S.T. Petcov, Higgs decays in the low scale type I see-saw model, Phys. Lett.B 718 (2013) 957 [arXiv:1208.3654] [INSPIRE].
28. P. Bandyopadhyay, E.J. Chun, H. Okada and J.-C. Park, Higgs signatures in inverse seesaw model at the LHC, JHEP01 (2013) 079 [arXiv:1209.4803] [INSPIRE].
29. F.F. Deppisch, M. Hirsch and H. Pas, Neutrinoless double beta decay and physics beyond the standard model, J. Phys.G 39 (2012) 124007 [arXiv:1208.0727] [INSPIRE].
30. M. Chrzaszcz, Searches for LFV and LNV decays at LHCb, arXiv:1301.2088 [INSPIRE].
31. D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 120801 [arXiv:0801.1134] [INSPIRE].
32. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
33. A. Freitas, J. Lykken, S. Kell and S. Westhoff, Testing the muon g − 2 anomaly at the LHC, JHEP05 (2014) 145 [arXiv:1402.7065] [INSPIRE].
34. T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov, The νMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses, Phys. Lett.B 631 (2005) 151 [hep-ph/0503065] [INSPIRE].
35. 0ν-decay, JHEP09 (2010) 108 [arXiv:1007.2378] [INSPIRE].
36. R.N. Mohapatra and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino mass and baryon number nonconservation in superstring models, Phys. Rev.D 34 (1986) 1642 [INSPIRE].
37. D.V. Forero, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 073012 [arXiv:1205.4018] [INSPIRE].
38. G.L. Fogli et al., Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP-violation searches, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 013012 [arXiv:1205.5254] [INSPIRE].
39. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado and T. Schwetz, Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision, JHEP12 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1209.3023] [INSPIRE].
40. D.V. Forero, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino oscillations refitted, arXiv:1405.7540 [INSPIRE].
41. http://www.nu-fit.org/
42. S. Antusch, C. Biggio, E. Fernandez-Martinez, M.B. Gavela and J. Lopez-Pavon, Unitarity of the leptonic mixing matrix, JHEP10 (2006) 084 [hep-ph/0607020] [INSPIRE].
43. S. Antusch, J.P. Baumann and E. Fernandez-Martinez, Non-standard neutrino interactions with matter from physics beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys.B 810 (2009) 369 [arXiv:0807.1003] [INSPIRE].
44. L. Lello and D. Boyanovsky, Searching for sterile neutrinos from π and K decays, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 073017 [arXiv:1208.5559] [INSPIRE].
45. F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Effects of new leptons in electroweak precision data, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 013010 [arXiv:0803.4008] [INSPIRE].
46. L. Basso, O. Fischer and J.J. van der Bij, Precision tests of unitarity in leptonic mixing, Europhys. Lett.105 (2014) 11001 [arXiv:1310.2057] [INSPIRE].
47. A.Y. Smirnov and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Sterile neutrinos: direct mixing effects versus induced mass matrix of active neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 013001 [hep-ph/0603009] [INSPIRE].
48. 76Ge from phase I of the GERDA experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 122503 [arXiv:1307.4720] [INSPIRE].
49. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Revised value of the eighth-order electron g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.99 (2007) 110406 [arXiv:0706.3496] [INSPIRE].
50. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Tenth-order lepton anomalous magnetic moment: second-order vertex containing two vacuum polarization subdiagrams, one within the other, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 113006 [arXiv:0810.5208] [INSPIRE].
51. G.F. Giudice, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g − 2, JHEP11 (2012) 113 [arXiv:1208.6583] [INSPIRE].
52. A. Aboubrahim, T. Ibrahim and P. Nath, Probe of new physics using precision measurement of the electron magnetic moment, arXiv:1403.6448 [INSPIRE].
53. P.J. Mohr, B.N. Taylor and D.B. Newell, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010, Rev. Mod. Phys.84 (2012) 1527 [arXiv:1203.5425] [INSPIRE].
54. M. Passera, The standard model prediction of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, J. Phys.G 31 (2005) R75 [hep-ph/0411168] [INSPIRE].
55. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Complete tenth-order QED contribution to the muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 111808 [arXiv:1205.5370] [INSPIRE].
56. A. Czarnecki, B. Krause and W.J. Marciano, Electroweak corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.76 (1996) 3267 [hep-ph/9512369] [INSPIRE].
57. T. Gribouk and A. Czarnecki, Electroweak interactions and the muon g − 2: bosonic two-loop effects, Phys. Rev.D 72 (2005) 053016 [hep-ph/0509205] [INSPIRE].
58. μafter the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].
59. M Z, Eur. Phys. J.C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum ibid.C 72 (2012) 1874] [arXiv:1010.4180] [INSPIRE].
60. A. Czarnecki and W.J. Marciano, The muon anomalous magnetic moment: a harbinger for ’new physics’, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 013014 [hep-ph/0102122] [INSPIRE].
61. C. Biggio, The contribution of fermionic seesaws to the anomalous magnetic moment of leptons, Phys. Lett.B 668 (2008) 378 [arXiv:0806.2558] [INSPIRE].
62. A. Ilakovac, A. Pilaftsis and L. Popov, Lepton dipole moments in supersymmetric low-scale seesaw models, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015001 [arXiv:1308.3633] [INSPIRE].
63. W. Abdallah, A. Awad, S. Khalil and H. Okada, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and μ→eγ in B-L model with inverse seesaw, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2108 [arXiv:1105.1047] [INSPIRE].
64. DELPHI collaboration, J. Abdallah et al., Study of τ -pair production in photon-photon collisions at LEP and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of the τ lepton, Eur. Phys. J.C 35 (2004) 159 [hep-ex/0406010] [INSPIRE].
65. S. Eidelman and M. Passera, Theory of the τ lepton anomalous magnetic moment, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 22 (2007) 159 [hep-ph/0701260] [INSPIRE].
66. E. Fernandez-Martinez, M.B. Gavela, J. Lopez-Pavon and O. Yasuda, CP-violation from non-unitary leptonic mixing, Phys. Lett.B 649 (2007) 427 [hep-ph/0703098] [INSPIRE].
67. F. Capozzi et al., Status of three-neutrino oscillation parameters, circa 2013, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 093018 [arXiv:1312.2878] [INSPIRE].
68. NA48/2 Collaboration, NA62 collaboration, E. Goudzovski, Kaon programme at CERN: recent results, PoSEPS-HEP2011 (2011) 181 [arXiv:1111.2818] [INSPIRE].
69. NA62 collaboration, C. Lazzeroni et al., Precision measurement of the ratio of the charged kaon leptonic decay rates, Phys. Lett.B 719 (2013) 326 [arXiv:1212.4012] [INSPIRE].
70. +ν¯$$ \overline{\nu} $$decays, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 112004 [arXiv:0910.3602] [INSPIRE].
71. thinternational workshop on charm physics (CHARM2010): Beijing, China, October 21-24, 2010, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser.02 (2011).
72. +ν with hadronic B tags, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 011107 [arXiv:0708.2260] [INSPIRE].
73. τwith a hadronic tagging method using the full data sample of Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 131801 [arXiv:1208.4678] [INSPIRE].
74. e[γ] branching ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett.99 (2007) 231801 [arXiv:0707.3439] [INSPIRE].
75. M. Finkemeier, Radiative corrections to π(l2) and K(l2) decays, Phys. Lett.B 387 (1996) 391 [hep-ph/9505434] [INSPIRE].
76. A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli and B. Zhang, The search for heavy majorana neutrinos, JHEP05 (2009) 030 [arXiv:0901.3589] [INSPIRE].
77. +γ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 201801 [arXiv:1303.0754] [INSPIRE].
78. 136Xe with EXO-200, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 032505 [arXiv:1205.5608] [INSPIRE].
79. EXO-200 collaboration, J.B. Albert et al., Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO-200 data, Nature510 (2014) 229 [arXiv:1402.6956] [INSPIRE].
80. KamLAND-Zen collaboration, A. Gando et al., Limit on neutrinoless ββ decay of Xe-136 from the first phase of KamLAND-Zen and comparison with the positive claim in Ge-76, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 062502 [arXiv:1211.3863] [INSPIRE].
81. EXO collaboration, D. Tosi, The search for neutrino-less double-beta decay: summary of current experiments, arXiv:1402.1170 [INSPIRE].
82. CUORE collaboration, P. Gorla, The CUORE experiment: status and prospects, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.375 (2012) 042013 [INSPIRE].
83. 130Te with CUORE, arXiv:1402.6072 [INSPIRE].
84. SNO+ collaboration, J. Hartnell, Neutrinoless double beta decay with SNO+, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.375 (2012) 042015 [arXiv:1201.6169] [INSPIRE].
85. SuperNEMO collaboration, A. Barabash, SuperNEMO double beta decay experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.375 (2012) 042012 [INSPIRE].
86. NEXT collaboration, F. Granena et al., NEXT, a HPGXe TPC for neutrinoless double beta decay searches, arXiv:0907.4054 [INSPIRE].
87. NEXT collaboration, J.J. Gomez-Cadenas et al., Present status and future perspectives of the NEXT experiment, arXiv:1307.3914 [INSPIRE].
88. J.F. Wilkerson et al., The Majorana demonstrator: a search for neutrinoless double-beta decay of germanium-76, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.375 (2012) 042010 [INSPIRE].
89. E. Bulbul et al., Detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked X-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters, Astrophys. J.789 (2014) 13 [arXiv:1402.2301] [INSPIRE].
90. A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi and J. Franse, An unidentified line in X-ray spectra of the Andromeda galaxy and Perseus galaxy cluster, arXiv:1402.4119 [INSPIRE].
91. G. Gelmini, E. Osoba, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, MeV sterile neutrinos in low reheating temperature cosmological scenarios, JCAP10 (2008) 029 [arXiv:0803.2735] [INSPIRE].
92. B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Cosmologically safe eV-scale sterile neutrinos and improved dark matter structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 031803 [arXiv:1310.6337] [INSPIRE].
93. M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Lopez-Pavon and J. Menendez, Neutrinoless double beta decay in seesaw models, JHEP07 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1005.3240] [INSPIRE].
94. A. Abada and M. Lucente, Looking for the minimal inverse seesaw realisation, Nucl. Phys.B 885 (2014) 651 [arXiv:1401.1507] [INSPIRE].
95. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.W.F. Valle, Fast decaying neutrinos and observable flavor violation in a new class of majoron models, Phys. Lett.B 216 (1989) 360 [INSPIRE].
96. J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and muon → e, γ, Nucl. Phys.B 618 (2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065] [INSPIRE].
97. D.V. Forero, S. Morisi, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Lepton flavor violation and non-unitary lepton mixing in low-scale type-I seesaw, JHEP09 (2011) 142 [arXiv:1107.6009] [INSPIRE].
98. M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson and H. Zhang, Non-unitarity effects in a realistic low-scale seesaw model, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 073009 [arXiv:0903.1961] [INSPIRE].
99. P.S.B. Dev and R.N. Mohapatra, TeV scale inverse seesaw in SO(10) and leptonic non-unitarity effects, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 013001 [arXiv:0910.3924] [INSPIRE].
100. J. Kopp, P.A.N. Machado, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Sterile neutrino oscillations: the global picture, JHEP05 (2013) 050 [arXiv:1303.3011] [INSPIRE].
101. A. Abada, G. Arcadi and M. Lucente, Dark matter in the minimal inverse seesaw mechanism, arXiv:1406.6556 [INSPIRE].