Testing the muon g-2 anomaly at the LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Freitas, A ^a   Lykken, J ^b   Kell, S ^a   Westhoff, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Gauge Symmetry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906733998     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2014)145     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. [1] Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
2. [2] Muon G-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
3. [3] F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The muon g − 2, Phys. Rept. 477 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.3360] [INSPIRE].
4. [4] Fermilab E989 collaboration, G. Venanzoni, The new g − 2 experiment at Fermilab, Frascati Phys. Ser. 56 (2012) 195 [INSPIRE].
5. [5] J-PARC g-2/EDM collaboration, N. Saito, A novel precision measurement of muon g − 2 and EDM at J-PARC, AIP Conf. Proc. 1467 (2012) 45 [INSPIRE].
6. [6] M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g − 2 and to (M2Z), Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum. C 72 (2012) 1874] [arXiv:1010.4180] [INSPIRE].
7. [7] K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, (g − 2)μ and (M2Z) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149] [INSPIRE].
8. [8] M. Benayoun, P. David, L. DelBuono and F. Jegerlehner, An update of the HLS estimate of the muon g − 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2453 [arXiv:1210.7184] [INSPIRE].
9. [9] S.N. Gninenko and N.V. Krasnikov, The muon anomalous magnetic moment and a new light gauge boson, Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001) 119 [hep-ph/0102222] [INSPIRE].
10. [10] P. Fayet, U-boson production in e+e− annihilations, and decays and light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 115017 [hep-ph/0702176] [INSPIRE].
11. [11] M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095002 [arXiv:0811.1030] [INSPIRE].
12. [12] H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee and W.J. Marciano, Dark side of Higgs diphoton decays and muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095009 [arXiv:1208.2973] [INSPIRE].
13. [13] M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
14. [14] ACME collaboration, J. Baron et al., Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Science 343 (2014) 269 [arXiv:1310.7534] [INSPIRE].
15. [15] V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Minimal flavor violation in the lepton sector, Nucl. Phys. B 728 (2005) 121 [hep-ph/0507001] [INSPIRE].
16. [16] MEG collaboration, J. Adam et al., New constraint on the existence of the μ+ ®e+ g decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 201801 [arXiv:1303.0754] [INSPIRE].
17. [17] T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
18. [18] A. Czarnecki and B. Krause, Electroweak corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 51C (1996) 148 [hep-ph/9606393] [INSPIRE].
19. [19] R. Mertig, M. Böhm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345 [INSPIRE].
20. [20] A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].
21. [21] ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP Electroweak Working Group collaborations, J. Alcaraz et al., A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the Standard Model, hep-ex/0612034 [INSPIRE].
22. [22] OPAL collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Tests of the Standard Model and constraints on new physics from measurements of fermion pair production at 189 GeV at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 13 (2000) 553 [hep-ex/9908008] [INSPIRE].
23. [23] K. Kannike, M. Raidal, D.M. Straub and A. Strumia, Anthropic solution to the magnetic muon anomaly: the charged see-saw, JHEP 02 (2012) 106 [Erratum. 10 (2012) 136] [arXiv:1111.2551] [INSPIRE].
24. [24] R. Dermisek and A. Raval, Explanation of the muon g − 2 anomaly with vectorlike leptons and its implications for Higgs decays, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013017 [arXiv:1305.3522] [INSPIRE].
25. [25] F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Effects of new leptons in electroweak precision data, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013010 [arXiv:0803.4008] [INSPIRE].
26. [26] T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Tenth-order QED contribution to the electron g − 2 and an improved value of the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111807 [arXiv:1205.5368] [INSPIRE].
27. [27] ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos in events with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in 21 fb−1 of pp collisions at ps = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-035, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
28. [28] CMS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons using leptonic final states in pp collisions at 8TeV, CMS-PAS-SUS-13-006, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
29. [29] ATLAS collaboration, Search for type III seesaw model heavy fermions in events with four charged leptons using 5.8 fb−1 of ps = 8TeV data with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-019, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
30. [30] CMS collaboration, Search for heavy lepton partners of neutrinos in proton-proton collisions in the context of the type-III seesaw mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 348 [arXiv:1210.1797] [INSPIRE].
31. [31] ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct-slepton and direct-chargino production in final states with two opposite-sign leptons, missing transverse momentum and no jets in 20 fb−1 of pp collisions at ps = 8TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-049, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
32. [32] CMS collaboration, Projected performance of an upgraded CMS detector at the LHC and HL-LHC: contribution to the Snowmass process, arXiv:1307.7135 [INSPIRE].
33. [33] J.L. Lopez, D.V. Nanopoulos and X. Wang, Large (g − 2)μ in SU(5) × U(1) supergravity models, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 366 [hep-ph/9308336] [INSPIRE].
34. [34] U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Probing supergravity grand unification in the Brookhaven g − 2 experiment, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1648 [hep-ph/9507386] [INSPIRE].
35. [35] T. Moroi, The muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum. D 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
36. [36] M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Yoshinaga, Muon g − 2 vs LHC in supersymmetric models, JHEP 01 (2014) 123 [arXiv:1303.4256] [INSPIRE].
37. [37] S. Mohanty, S. Rao and D.P. Roy, Reconciling the muon g − 2 and dark matter relic density with the LHC results in nonuniversal gaugino mass models, JHEP 09 (2013) 027 [arXiv:1303.5830] [INSPIRE].
38. [38] M. Ibe, T.T. Yanagida and N. Yokozaki, Muon g − 2 and 125 GeV Higgs in split-family supersymmetry, JHEP 08 (2013) 067 [arXiv:1303.6995] [INSPIRE].
39. [39] BayesFITS Group collaboration, A. Fowlie, K. Kowalska, L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Dark matter and collider signatures of the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055012 [arXiv:1306.1567] [INSPIRE].
40. [40] T. Han, I.-W. Kim and J. Song, Kinematic cusps: determining the missing particle mass at colliders, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 575 [arXiv:0906.5009] [INSPIRE].
41. [41] N.D. Christensen, T. Han, J. Song and Stefanus, Determining the dark matter particle mass through Antler topology processes at lepton colliders, arXiv:1404.6258 [INSPIRE].