Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 331-341

  Koning, Raphael ^a   Madhu, Nilesh ^a   Wouters, Jan ^a  

^a KU LEUVEN UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Binary mask (BM); cochlear implants (CIs); noise reduction; speech enhancement; Wiener filter (WF)

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AUDITION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ERRORS; MASKS; NOISE ABATEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; SPEECH ENHANCEMENT;

BINARY MASKS; COCHLEAR IMPLANT (CIS); COCHLEAR IMPLANT LISTENERS; HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS; IDEAL BINARY MASK (IBM); SPEECH ENHANCEMENT ALGORITHM; TIME-FREQUENCY MASKING; WIENER FILTER;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE REDUCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME FREQUENCY MASKING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; REHABILITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PERSONS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENTS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919905473     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2351854     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. D. S. Brungart, P. S. Chang, B. D. Simpson, and D. Wang, "Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal timefrequency," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 120, pp. 4007-4018, 2006.
2. I. Brons, R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler, "Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 2690-2699, 2012.
3. D.Wang, "Time-frequencymasking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design," Trends Amplification, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 323-353, 2008.
4. N.Madhu, A. Spriet, S. Jansen, R. Koning, and J.Wouters, "The potential for speech intelligibility improvement using the ideal binary mask and the ideal wiener filter in single channel noise reduction systems: Application to auditory prostheses," IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 63-72, Jan. 2013.
5. D. Wang, "On ideal binary mask as the computational goal of auditory scene analysis," in Speech Seperation by Humans and Machines. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer, 2005, pp. 181-197.
6. D.Wang and G. J. Brown, Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA:Wiley, 2006.
7. M. C. Anzalone, L. Calandruccio, K. A. Doherty, and L. H. Carney, "Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation," Ear Hearing, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 480-492, 2006.
8. S. Cao, L. Li, and X. Wu, "Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binarymasked noisy speech by adding background noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 2227-2236, 2011.
9. E.W. Healy, S. E. Yoho, Y.Wang, and D.Wang, "An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 3029-3038, 2013.
10. G. Kim, Y. Hu, and P. Loizou, "An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 1486-1494, 2009.
11. N. L. Li and P. C. Loizou, "Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: Implications for noise reduction," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 1673-1682, 2008.
12. D. Wang, U. Kjems, M. S. Pedersen, J. B. Boldt, and T. Lunner, "Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 2236-2347, 2009.
13. Y. Hu and P. C. Loizou, "A comparative intelligibility study of singlemicrophone noise reduction algorithms," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 122, pp. 1777-1786, 2007.
14. U. Kjems, J. B. Boldt, M. S. Pedersen, T. Lunner, and D. Wang, "Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 126, pp. 1415-1426, 2009.
15. D. Wang, U. Kjems, M. S. Pedersen, J. B. Boldt, and T. Lunner, "Speech perception of noise with binary gains," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 2303-2307, 2008.
16. Y. Hu and P. C. Loizou, "Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms," Speech Commun., vol. 49, pp. 588-601, 2007.
17. R. J. van Hoesel and G. M. Clark, "Evaluation of a portable twomicrophone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 2498-2503, 1995.
18. J.Wouters and J.VandenBerghe, "Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implantees with a two microphone monaural adaptive noise reduction system," Ear Hearing, vol. 22, pp. 420-430, 2001.
19. A. Spriet, L. Van Deun, K. Eftaxiadis, J. Laneau,M.Moonen, B. van Dijk, A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters, "Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer beam in the nucleus freedom cochlear implant system," Ear Hearing, vol. 28, pp. 62-72, 2007.
20. O. Ur Rehman Qazi, B. van Dijk, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters, "Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility," Hearing Res., vol. 299, pp. 79-87, 2013.
21. K. Kokkinakis, B. Behnam, Y. Hu, and D. R. Friedland, "Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants," Trends Amplification, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 102-116, 2012.
22. S. J. Mauger, P. W. Dawson, and A. A. Hersbach, "Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 327-336, 2012.
23. T. Strydom and J. J. Hanekom, "The performance of different synthesis signals in acoustic models of cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 920-933, 2011.
24. P. Vary and R. Martin, "Single and Dual Channel Noise Reduction," in Digital Speech Transmission-Enhancement, Coding and Error Concealment, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2006, pp. 389-466.
25. P. C. Loizou and G. Kim, "Reasons why current speech-enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions," IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47-56, Jan. 2011.
26. O. Cappé, "Elimination of the musical noise phenomenon with the Ephraim and Malah noise suppressor," IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 345-349, Apr. 1994.
27. L. M. Friesen, R. V. Shannon, D. Baskent, and X.Wang, "Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 110, pp. 1150-1163, 2001.
28. A. van Wieringen and J. Wouters, "LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for flanders and the Netherlands," Int. J. Audiol., vol. 47, pp. 348-355, 2008.
29. S. Jansen, R. Koning, J. Wouters, and A. Van Wieringen, "Development and validation of the leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (list-m)," Int. J. Audiol., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 55-59, 2014.
30. T. Francart, A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters, "Apex3: A multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments," J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 172, pp. 283-293, 2008.]
31. K. H. Arehart, J. M. Kates,M. C. Anderson, and L. O. Harvey Jr., "Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 1150-1164, 2007.
32. H. Luts, K. Eneman, J. Wouters, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, M. Buechler, N. Dillier,R.Houben,W. A. Dreschler,M. Froehlich,H. Puder, G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, A. Leijon, A. Lombard, D. Mauler, and A. Spriet, "Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 127, pp. 1491-1505, 2010.
33. G. A. Studebaker, "A 'rationalized' arcsine transform," J. Speech Hearing Res., vol. 28, pp. 455-462, 1985.
34. M. F. Dorman, P. C. Loizou, J. Fitzke, and Z. Tu, "The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlearimplant signal processors with 6-20 channels," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 104, pp. 3583-3585, 1998.
35. K. S. Henry and M. G. Heinz, "Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise," Nature Neurosci., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1362-1364, 2012.
36. N. L. Li and P.C. Loizou, "Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 123, no. 4, pp. EL59-EL64, 2008.
37. O. Ur Rehman Qazi, B. van Dijk, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters, "Speech understanding performance of cochlear implant subjects using timefrequency masking-based noise reduction," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1364-1373, May 2012.
38. P. W. Dawson, S. J. Mauger, and A. A. Hersbach, "Clinical evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio-based noise reduction in nucleus cochlear implant recipients," Ear Hearing, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 382-390, 2011.
39. R. V. Shannon, F. G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid, "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues," Science, vol. 270, pp. 303-304, 1995.
40. J. Jensen and R. Hendricks, "Spectral magnitude minimum mean-square error binary masks for DFT based speech enhancements," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2011, pp. 4736-4739.
41. N. Madhu, C. Breithaupt, and R. Martin, "Temporal smoothing of spectral masks in the cepstral domain for speech separation," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2008, pp. 1-4.