Dark matter with two inert doublets plus one Higgs doublet

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Keus, Venus ^a,b,c,d   King, Stephen F ^b   Moretti, Stefano ^b,d   Sokolowska, Dorota ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Chilton   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Discrete and Finite Symmetries

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919884263     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2014)016     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. (2014) [arXiv:1303.5076] [INSPIRE].
4. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
5. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
6. L. Bergstrom, Nonbaryonic dark matter: observational evidence and detection methods, Rept. Prog. Phys.63 (2000) 793 [hep-ph/0002126] [INSPIRE].
7. H.P. Nilles, Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics, Phys. Rept.110 (1984) 1 [INSPIRE].
8. H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rept.117 (1985) 75 [INSPIRE].
9. H.-C. Cheng, J.L. Feng and K.T. Matchev, Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125] [INSPIRE].
10. G. Servant and T.M.P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys.B 650 (2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071] [INSPIRE].
11. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
12. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
13. N.G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Pattern of symmetry breaking with two Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev.D 18 (1978) 2574 [INSPIRE].
14. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
15. 3scalar singlet dark matter, JCAP01 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1211.1014] [INSPIRE].
16. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall and V.S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: an alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188] [INSPIRE].
17. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver and M.H.G. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: an archetype for dark matter, JCAP02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].
18. pscalar dark matter from multi-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 016004 [arXiv:1203.3426] [INSPIRE].
19. B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
20. X. Chu, T. Hambye and M.H.G. Tytgat, The four basic ways of creating dark matter through a portal, JCAP05 (2012) 034 [arXiv:1112.0493] [INSPIRE].
21. F.S. Queiroz and K. Sinha, The poker face of the Majoron dark matter model: LUX to keV line, Phys. Lett.B 735 (2014) 69 [arXiv:1404.1400] [INSPIRE].
22. Y. Mambrini, Higgs searches and singlet scalar dark matter: combined constraints from XENON100 and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 115017 [arXiv:1108.0671] [INSPIRE].
23. A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 709 (2012) 65 [arXiv:1112.3299] [INSPIRE].
24. A. Djouadi, A. Falkowski, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Direct detection of Higgs-portal dark matter at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2455 [arXiv:1205.3169] [INSPIRE].
25. I.P. Ivanov and E. Vdovin, Classification of finite reparametrization symmetry groups in the three-Higgs-doublet model, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2309 [arXiv:1210.6553] [INSPIRE].
26. V. Keus, S.F. King and S. Moretti, Three-Higgs-doublet models: symmetries, potentials and Higgs boson masses, JHEP01 (2014) 052 [arXiv:1310.8253] [INSPIRE].
27. B. Grzadkowski, O.M. Ogreid, P. Osland, A. Pukhov and M. Purmohammadi, Exploring the CP-violating inert-doublet model, JHEP06 (2011) 003 [arXiv:1012.4680] [INSPIRE].
28. I.P. Ivanov, V. Keus and E. Vdovin, Abelian symmetries in multi-Higgs-doublet models, J. Phys.A 45 (2012) 215201 [arXiv:1112.1660] [INSPIRE].
29. −1of pp collision data, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 052004 [arXiv:1406.3827] [INSPIRE].
30. CMS collaboration, Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and studies of the compatibility of its couplings with the standard model, CMS-PAS-HIG-14-009, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
31. K. Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
32. Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Observing the dark scalar doublet and its impact on the standard model Higgs boson at colliders, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 095011 [arXiv:0708.2939] [INSPIRE].
33. E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsjo, The inert doublet model and LEP II limits, Phys. Rev.D 79 (2009) 035013 [arXiv:0810.3924] [INSPIRE].
34. ATLAS collaboration, Constraints on new phenomena via Higgs coupling measurements with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-010, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
35. CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of Higgs bosons in the vector boson fusion and associated ZH production modes, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2980 [arXiv:1404.1344] [INSPIRE].
36. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075008 [arXiv:1306.2941] [INSPIRE].
37. CMS collaboration, Observation of the diphoton decay of the Higgs boson and measurement of its properties, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3076 [arXiv:1407.0558] [INSPIRE].
38. 3: a program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
39. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
40. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
41. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 milky way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 042001 [arXiv:1310.0828] [INSPIRE].
42. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Constraining dark matter models from a combined analysis of milky way satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 241302 [arXiv:1108.3546] [INSPIRE].
43. M. Cirelli and G. Giesen, Antiprotons from dark matter: current constraints and future sensitivities, JCAP04 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1301.7079] [INSPIRE].
44. H.E.S.S. collaboration, A. Abramowski et al., Search for a dark matter annihilation signal from the galactic center halo with H.E.S.S., Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 161301 [arXiv:1103.3266] [INSPIRE].
45. CDMS collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., Limits on spin-independent wimp-nucleon interactions from the two-tower run of the cryogenic dark matter search, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 011302 [astro-ph/0509259] [INSPIRE].
46. E.M. Dolle and S. Su, The inert dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 055012 [arXiv:0906.1609] [INSPIRE].
47. E. Dolle, X. Miao, S. Su and B. Thomas, Dilepton signals in the inert doublet model, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 035003 [arXiv:0909.3094] [INSPIRE].
48. C. Arina, F.-S. Ling and M.H.G. Tytgat, IDM and iDM or the inert doublet model and inelastic dark matter, JCAP10 (2009) 018 [arXiv:0907.0430] [INSPIRE].
49. M.H.G. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: a new archetype of WIMP dark matter?, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.120 (2008) 042026 [arXiv:0712.4206] [INSPIRE].
50. L. Lopez Honorez and C.E. Yaguna, The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, JHEP09 (2010) 046 [arXiv:1003.3125] [INSPIRE].
51. L. Lopez Honorez and C.E. Yaguna, A new viable region of the inert doublet model, JCAP01 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.1411] [INSPIRE].
52. D. Sokolowska, Dark matter data and quartic self-couplings in inert doublet model, Acta Phys. Polon.B 42 (2011) 2237 [arXiv:1112.2953] [INSPIRE].
53. D. Sokolowska, Dark matter data and constraints on quartic couplings in IDM, arXiv:1107.1991 [INSPIRE].
54. γγand WMAP data, JHEP09 (2013) 055 [arXiv:1305.6266] [INSPIRE].
55. A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann and O. Stal, Dark matter in the inert doublet model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, JHEP09 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1303.3010] [INSPIRE].
56. A. Arhrib, Y.-L.S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and T.-C. Yuan, An updated analysis of inert Higgs doublet model in light of the recent results from LUX, PLANCK, AMS-02 and LHC, arXiv:1310.0358 [INSPIRE].
57. V. Keus, S.F. King and S. Moretti, Phenomenology of the inert (2 +1) and (4 +2) Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 075015 [arXiv:1408.0796] [INSPIRE].
58. E.C. F.S. Fortes, A.C.B. Machado, J. Montaño and V. Pleitez, Scalar dark matter candidates in two inert Higgs doublet model, arXiv:1407.4749 [INSPIRE].