Constraining inert dark matter by R γγ and WMAP data

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Krawczyk, Maria ^a   Sokołowska, Dorota ^a   Swaczyna, Paweł ^a   Świeżewska, Bogumiła ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884539163     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2013)055     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
2. DAMA collaboration, R. Bernabei et al., First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 333 [ arXiv:0804.2741 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. CoGeNT collaboration, C. Aalseth et al., Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [ arXiv:1002.4703 ] [ INSPIRE ].
4. C. Aalseth et al., Search for an annual modulation in a p-type point contact germanium dark matter detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141301 [ arXiv:1106.0650 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. CDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Dark matter search results using the silicon detectors of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2013) [ arXiv:1304.4279 ] [ INSPIRE ].
6. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1971 [ arXiv:1109.0702 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [ arXiv:1207.5988 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl and C. Weniger, Fermi LAT search for internal bremsstrahlung signatures from dark matter annihilation, JCAP 07 (2012) 054 [ arXiv:1203.1312 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. C. Weniger, A tentative γ-ray line from dark matter annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 08 (2012) 007 [ arXiv:1204.2797 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. Fermi-LAT collaboration, Search for γ-ray spectral lines with the Fermi Large Area Telescope and dark matter implications, arXiv:1305.5597 [ INSPIRE ].
11. T. Bringmann and C. Weniger, Gamma ray signals from dark matter: concepts, status and prospects, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 194 [ arXiv:1208.5481 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. L. Bergstrom, Dark matter evidence, particle physics candidates and detection methods, Annalen Phys. 524 (2012) 479 [ arXiv:1205.4882 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. J. Collar and D. McKinsey, Comments on 'First dark matter results from the XENON100 experiment', arXiv:1005.0838 [ INSPIRE ].
14. XENON100 collaboration, Reply to the comments on the XENON100 first dark matter results, arXiv:1005.2615 [ INSPIRE ].
15. J. Collar and D. McKinsey, Reply to arXiv:1005:2615, arXiv:1005.3723 [ INSPIRE ].
16. J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Light dark matter in the light of CRESST-II, JCAP 03 (2012) 001 [ arXiv:1110.2721 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The unbearable lightness of being: CDMS versus XENON, JCAP 07 (2013) 023 [ arXiv:1304.6066 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and K. Freese, Compatibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches, JCAP 04 (2009) 010 [ arXiv:0808.3607 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. J.M. Cline, Z. Liu and W. Xue, An optimistic CoGeNT analysis, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015001 [ arXiv:1207.3039 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Observing the dark scalar doublet and its impact on the standard-model Higgs boson at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095011 [ arXiv:0708.2939 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall and V.S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: an alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015007 [ hep-ph/0603188 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. I. Ginzburg, K. Kanishev, M. Krawczyk and D. Sokolowska, Evolution of Universe to the present inert phase, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123533 [ arXiv:1009.4593 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. D. Sokolowska, Dark matter data and quartic self-couplings in inert doublet model, Acta Phys. Polon. B 42 (2011) 2237 [ arXiv:1112.2953 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. D. Sokolowska, Dark matter data and constraints on quartic couplings in IDM, arXiv:1107.1991 [ INSPIRE ].
25. D. Sokolowska, Temperature evolution of physical parameters in the Inert Doublet Model, arXiv:1104.3326 [ INSPIRE ].
26. T. Hambye and M.H. Tytgat, Electroweak symmetry breaking induced by dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 651 [ arXiv:0707.0633 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. S. Kanemura, Y. Okada and E. Senaha, Electroweak baryogenesis and quantum corrections to the triple Higgs boson coupling, Phys. Lett. B 606 (2005) 361 [ hep-ph/0411354 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. G. Gil, P. Chankowski and M. Krawczyk, Inert dark matter and strong electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 396 [ arXiv:1207.0084 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Improved electroweak phase transition with subdominant inert doublet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 071701 [ arXiv:1302.2614 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. T.A. Chowdhury, M. Nemevšek, G. Senjanović and Y. Zhang, Dark matter as the trigger of strong electroweak phase transition, JCAP 02 (2012) 029 [ arXiv:1110.5334 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [ hep-ph/0601225 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, The cocktail model: neutrino masses and mixings with dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 211802 [ arXiv:1212.4806 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. P. Agrawal, E.M. Dolle and C.A. Krenke, Signals of inert doublet dark matter in neutrino telescopes, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015015 [ arXiv:0811.1798 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. M. Gustafsson, E. Lundstrom, L. Bergstrom and J. Edsjo, Significant γ lines from inert Higgs dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 041301 [ astro-ph/0703512 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. E.M. Dolle and S. Su, The inert dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055012 [ arXiv:0906.1609 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. E. Dolle, X. Miao, S. Su and B. Thomas, Dilepton signals in the inert doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 035003 [ arXiv:0909.3094 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver and M.H. Tytgat, The inert doublet model: an archetype for dark matter, JCAP 02 (2007) 028 [ hep-ph/0612275 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. C. Arina, F.-S. Ling and M.H. Tytgat, IDM and iDM or the Inert Doublet Model and inelastic Dark Matter, JCAP 10 (2009) 018 [ arXiv:0907.0430 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. M.H. Tytgat, The Inert Doublet Model: a new archetype of WIMP dark matter?, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 120 (2008) 042026 [ arXiv:0712.4206 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. L. Lopez Honorez and C.E. Yaguna, The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, JHEP 09 (2010) 046 [ arXiv:1003.3125 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. M. Krawczyk and D. Sokolowska, Constraining the Dark 2HDM, arXiv:0911.2457 [ INSPIRE ].
42. S. Kanemura, T. Kubota and E. Takasugi, Lee-Quigg-Thacker bounds for Higgs boson masses in a two doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 313 (1993) 155 [ hep-ph/9303263 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. A.G. Akeroyd, A. Arhrib and E.-M. Naimi, Note on tree level unitarity in the general two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000) 119 [ hep-ph/0006035 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. B. Swiezewska, Yukawa independent constraints for 2HDMs with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, arXiv:1209.5725 [ INSPIRE ].
45. E. Lundstrom, M. Gustafsson and J. Edsjo, The Inert Doublet Model and LEP II limits, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035013 [ arXiv:0810.3924 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. M. Gustafsson, The Inert Doublet Model and its phenomenology, PoS(CHARGED 2010)030 [ arXiv:1106.1719 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. M. Gustafsson, S. Rydbeck, L. Lopez-Honorez and E. Lundstrom, Status of the Inert Doublet Model and the role of multileptons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075019 [ arXiv:1206.6316 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. S. Nie and M. Sher, Vacuum stability bounds in the two Higgs doublet model, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 89 [ hep-ph/9811234 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. J. Elias-Miro et al., Higgs mass implications on the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 222 [ arXiv:1112.3022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann and O. Stal, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, arXiv:1303.3010 [ INSPIRE ].
51. A. Barroso, P. Ferreira, I. Ivanov and R. Santos, Tree-level metastability bounds in two-Higgs doublet models, arXiv:1305.1235 [ INSPIRE ].
52. K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2012) 075021 [ INSPIRE ].
53. A. Pierce and J. Thaler, Natural dark matter from an unnatural Higgs boson and new colored particles at the TeV scale, JHEP 08 (2007) 026 [ hep-ph/0703056 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. L. Lopez Honorez and C.E. Yaguna, A new viable region of the inert doublet model, JCAP 01 (2011) 002 [ arXiv:1011.1411 ] [ INSPIRE ].
55. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-012 (2013).
56. C. Mariotti, Recent results on higgs studies at CMS, slides of a talk given at CERN, April 15, (2013).
57. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503173 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: the Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept. 457 (2008) 1 [ hep-ph/0503172 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. P. Posch, Enhancement of h → γγ in the two Higgs doublet model type I, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 447 [ arXiv:1001.1759 ] [ INSPIRE ].
60. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik and N. Gaur, H → γγ in inert Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095021 [ arXiv:1201.2644 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. B. Swiezewska and M. Krawczyk, Diphoton rate in the Inert Doublet Model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, arXiv:1212.4100 [ INSPIRE ].
62. A. Djouadi, A. Falkowski, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Direct detection of Higgs-portal dark matter at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2455 [ arXiv:1205.3169 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J. Gunion and S. Kraml, Status of invisible Higgs decays, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 340 [ arXiv:1302.5694 ] [ INSPIRE ].
64. B. Dumont, Higgs couplings after Moriond, arXiv:1305.4635 [ INSPIRE ].
65. S. Andreas, M.H. Tytgat and Q. Swillens, Neutrinos from inert doublet dark matter, JCAP 04 (2009) 004 [ arXiv:0901.1750 ] [ INSPIRE ].
66. 2 symmetry in light of new LHC data, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 447 (2013) 012050 [ arXiv:1303.7102 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. M. Krawczyk, D. Sokolowska and B. Swiezewska, Inert doublet model with a 125 GeV Higgs, arXiv:1304.7757 [ INSPIRE ].
68. A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 65 [ arXiv:1112.3299 ] [ INSPIRE ].
69. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs3.1: a program for calculating dark matter observables, arXiv:1305.0237 [ INSPIRE ].
70. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Constraining dark matter models from a combined analysis of Milky Way satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241302 [ arXiv:1108.3546 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Fermi LAT search for dark matter in γ-ray lines and the inclusive photon spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 022002 [ arXiv:1205.2739 ] [ INSPIRE ].
72. J. Kopp, Constraints on dark matter annihilation from AMS-02 results, arXiv:1304.1184 [ INSPIRE ].
73. K.N. Abazajian, P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C. Kilic, Lower limits on the strengths of γ ray lines from WIMP dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 123543 [ arXiv:1111.2835 ] [ INSPIRE ].
74. A. Geringer-Sameth and S.M. Koushiappas, Exclusion of canonical WIMPs by the joint analysis of Milky Way dwarfs with Fermi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241303 [ arXiv:1108.2914 ] [ INSPIRE ].