Partially composite dark matter

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Asano, Masaki ^a   Kitano, Ryuichiro ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR RESEARCH ORGANIZATION KEK   (Japan)

^c GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919880130     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)171     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. −1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-012, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
4. CMS collaboration, Updated measurements of the Higgs boson at 125 GeV in the two photon decay channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
5. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 183 [INSPIRE].
6. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 187 [INSPIRE].
7. H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and P. Galison, Calculation of the composite Higgs mass, Phys. Lett.B 143 (1984) 152 [INSPIRE].
8. H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett.B 145 (1984) 216 [INSPIRE].
9. M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 254 (1985) 299 [INSPIRE].
10. D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys.B 365 (1991) 259 [INSPIRE].
11. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki and J. Serra, Composite Higgses, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2766 [arXiv:1401.2457] [INSPIRE].
12. S. Nussinov, Technocosmology: could a technibaryon excess provide a ‘natural’ missing mass candidate?, Phys. Lett.B 165 (1985) 55 [INSPIRE].
13. S.M. Barr, R.S. Chivukula and E. Farhi, Electroweak fermion number violation and the production of stable particles in the early universe, Phys. Lett.B 241 (1990) 387 [INSPIRE].
14. S.B. Gudnason, C. Kouvaris and F. Sannino, Towards working technicolor: effective theories and dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 115003 [hep-ph/0603014] [INSPIRE].
15. S.B. Gudnason, C. Kouvaris and F. Sannino, Dark matter from new technicolor theories, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 095008 [hep-ph/0608055] [INSPIRE].
16. R. Foadi, M.T. Frandsen and F. Sannino, Technicolor dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 037702 [arXiv:0812.3406] [INSPIRE].
17. H. Murayama and J. Shu, Topological dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 686 (2010) 162 [arXiv:0905.1720] [INSPIRE].
18. A. Joseph and S.G. Rajeev, Topological dark matter in the little Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 074009 [arXiv:0905.2772] [INSPIRE].
19. M. Gillioz, A. von Manteuffel, P. Schwaller and D. Wyler, The little skyrmion: new dark matter for little Higgs models, JHEP03 (2011) 048 [arXiv:1012.5288] [INSPIRE].
20. M. Gillioz, Dangerous skyrmions in little Higgs models, JHEP02 (2012) 121 [Erratum ibid.03 (2013) 123] [arXiv:1111.2047] [INSPIRE].
21. J. Ellis, M. Karliner and M. Praszalowicz, Generalized skyrmions in QCD and the electroweak sector, JHEP03 (2013) 163 [arXiv:1209.6430] [INSPIRE].
22. A. Pomarol and A. Wulzer, Stable skyrmions from extra dimensions, JHEP03 (2008) 051 [arXiv:0712.3276] [INSPIRE].
23. D. Poland and J. Thaler, The dark top, JHEP11 (2008) 083 [arXiv:0808.1290] [INSPIRE].
24. M. Frigerio, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Composite scalar dark matter, JHEP07 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1204.2808] [INSPIRE].
25. D. Marzocca and A. Urbano, Composite dark matter and LHC interplay, JHEP07 (2014) 107 [arXiv:1404.7419] [INSPIRE].
26. C. Kouvaris, Dark Majorana particles from the minimal walking technicolor, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 015011 [hep-ph/0703266] [INSPIRE].
27. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
28. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
29. C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
30. K. Agashe and R. Contino, The minimal composite Higgs model and electroweak precision tests, Nucl. Phys.B 742 (2006) 59 [hep-ph/0510164] [INSPIRE].
31. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A custodial symmetry for Zbb, Phys. Lett.B 641 (2006) 62 [hep-ph/0605341] [INSPIRE].
32. R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 055014 [hep-ph/0612048] [INSPIRE].
33. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, The composite Higgs and light resonance connection, JHEP08 (2012) 135 [arXiv:1205.6434] [INSPIRE].
34. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs, JHEP01 (2013) 164 [arXiv:1204.6333] [INSPIRE].
35. M. Redi and A. Tesi, Implications of a light Higgs in composite models, JHEP10 (2012) 166 [arXiv:1205.0232] [INSPIRE].
36. D. Marzocca, M. Serone and J. Shu, General composite Higgs models, JHEP08 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1205.0770] [INSPIRE].
37. G. Panico, M. Redi, A. Tesi and A. Wulzer, On the tuning and the mass of the composite Higgs, JHEP03 (2013) 051 [arXiv:1210.7114] [INSPIRE].
38. D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm and R. Torre, A minimally tuned composite Higgs model from an extra dimension, JHEP07 (2013) 058 [arXiv:1303.3062] [INSPIRE].
39. L. Vecchi, The natural composite Higgs, arXiv:1304.4579 [INSPIRE].
40. L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 179 [arXiv:1203.2064] [INSPIRE].
41. L. Vecchi, A heavy “neutralino” in warped extra dimensions, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 025017 [arXiv:1310.7862] [INSPIRE].
42. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [INSPIRE].
43. M.A. Fedderke, J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, The fermionic dark matter Higgs portal: an effective field theory approach, JHEP08 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1404.2283] [INSPIRE].
44. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. (2014) [arXiv:1303.5076] [INSPIRE].
45. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic and R.K. Mishra, A classification of dark matter candidates with primarily spin-dependent interactions with matter, arXiv:1003.1912 [INSPIRE].
46. f = 2 + 1 lattice QCD with exact chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 034509 [arXiv:1208.4185] [INSPIRE].
47. H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting scalar and pseudoscalar couplings with nucleons, JHEP07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
48. 3: a program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
49. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
50. LUX collaboration, M. Szydagis et al., A detailed look at the first results from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter experiment, arXiv:1402.3731 [INSPIRE].
51. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys.148 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
52. M.A. Fedderke, E.W. Kolb, T. Lin and L.-T. Wang, Gamma-ray constraints on dark-matter annihilation to electroweak gauge and Higgs bosons, JCAP01 (2014) 001 [arXiv:1310.6047] [INSPIRE].
53. S. Dawson et al., Working group report: Higgs boson, arXiv:1310.8361 [INSPIRE].
54. CMS collaboration, Search for an invisible Higgs boson, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-013, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
55. CMS collaboration, Search for invisible Higgs produced in association with a Z boson, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-018, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
56. ATLAS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced in association with a Z boson in ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 201802 [arXiv:1402.3244] [INSPIRE].
57. −1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2014-009, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
58. G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, U. Ellwanger, J.F. Gunion and S. Kraml, Global fit to Higgs signal strengths and couplings and implications for extended Higgs sectors, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075008 [arXiv:1306.2941] [INSPIRE].
59. S. Bhattacharya et al., Prospects for a heavy vector-like charge 2/3 quark T search at the LHC withs$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 14 TeV and 33 TeV. “A Snowmass 2013 whitepaper”, arXiv:1309.0026 [INSPIRE].
60. Top Quark Working Group collaboration, K. Agashe et al., Working group report: top quark, arXiv:1311.2028 [INSPIRE].
61. H.-C. Cheng, B.A. Dobrescu and J. Gu, Higgs mass from compositeness at a multi-TeV scale, JHEP08 (2014) 095 [arXiv:1311.5928] [INSPIRE].
62. H.S. Fukano, M. Kurachi, S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, Higgs as a top-mode pseudo, arXiv:1311.6629 [INSPIRE].