Clarifying the sequential processes involved in a cued continuous performance test

Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 67-80

  Karamacoska, Diana ^a   Barry, Robert J ^a   Steiner, Genevieve Z ^a   de Blasio, Frances M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contingent negative variation (CNV); Continuous performance test (CPT); Event related potentials (ERPs); Principal components analysis (PCA); Response efficiency; Sequential processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919846043     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12286     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barry, R. J., & De Blasio, F. M. (2013). Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: A temporal PCA study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 89, 123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.012
2. Bekker, E. M., Kenemans, J. L., & Verbaten, M. N. (2004). Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2001-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.008
3. Bickel, S., Dias, E. C., Epstein, M. L., & Javitt, D. C. (2012). Expectancy-related modulations of neural oscillations in continuous performance tasks. NeuroImage, 62, 1867-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.009
4. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2224-2232. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5
5. Croft, R. J., & Barry, R. J. (2000). Removal of ocular artefact from the EEG: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 30, 5-19. doi: 10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00055-1
6. Crowley, K. E., & Colrain, I. M. (2004). A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: Age, sleep and modality. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 732-744. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.021
7. Dien, J. (2010). The ERP PCA toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of the event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187, 138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009
8. Doallo, S., Lorenzo-Lopez, L., Vizoso, C., Rodriguez Holguin, S., Amendo, E., Bara, S., Cadaveira, F. (2005). Modulations of the visual N1 component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 807-820. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.013
9. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
10. Friedman, D., Boltri, J., Vaughan, H. G., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1985). Effects of age and sex on the endogenous brain potential components during two continuous performance tasks. Psychophysiology, 22, 440-452. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01630.x
11. Friedman, D., Vaughan, H. G., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1981). Multiple late positive potentials in two visual discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology, 18, 635-649. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01838.x
12. Gaillard, A. W. (1976). Effects of warning-signal modality on the contingent negative variation. Biological Psychology, 4, 139-154. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(76)90013-2
13. Gordon, M. (1983). The Gordon diagnostic system. DeWitt, NY: Gordon Systems.
14. Gordon, M. (1986). How is a computerised attention test used in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder? Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 19, 53-64.
15. Hämmerer, D., Li, S., Müller, V., & Lindenberger, U. (2010). An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: Assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilisation, response anticipation, and response suppression. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3305-3316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.014
16. Howell, D. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
17. Jarvilehto, T., & Fruhstorfer, H. (1970). Differentiation between slow cortical potentials associated with motor and mental acts in man. Experimental Brain Research, 11, 309-317.
18. Jodo, E., & Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477-482. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L
19. Jonkman, L. M. (2006). The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood; a Go/NoGo ERP study. Brain Research, 1097, 181-193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064
20. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2003). Optimising PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: Theoretical rationale and empirical examination. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2307-2325. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00241-4
21. Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Gurvit, H., Keskin, Y. H., Emre, M., & Demiralp, T. (2006). Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Brain Research, 1104, 114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010
22. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioural and Social Sciences, 2, 57-64. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
23. Näätänen, R. (1982). Processing negativity: An evoked potential reflection of selective attention. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 605-640.
24. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
25. O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analysing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316-333. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.316
26. Oddy, B. W., Barry, R. J., Johnstone, S. J., & Clarke, A. R. (2005). Removal of CNV effects from the N2 and P3 ERP components in a visual Go/NoGo task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 24-34. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.19.1.24
27. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-X
28. Pritchard, W. S., Shappell, S. A., & Brandt, M. E. (1991). Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. In J. R. Jennings & P. K. Ackles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: A research annual (vol. 4, pp. 43-106). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
29. Riccio, C. A., Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P., & Moore, J. J. (2002). The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates for attention? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 235-272. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00111-1
30. Roberts, L. E., Rau, H., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1994). Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/NoGo discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 44-55. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90006-X
31. Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G., & Ritter, W. (1977). The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuropsychology, 43, 864-875. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90009-8
32. Smith, J. L., Barry, R. J., & Steiner, G. Z. (2013). CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: A failure to replicate Simson et al. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 89, 349-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.002
33. Smith, J. L., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2006). Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a wanted Go/NoGo paradigm: Response preparation, execution and inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 121-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.013
34. Snyder, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1980). Similarities and differences among the P3 waves to detected signals in three modalities. Psychophysiology, 17, 112-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00120.x
35. Suwazono, S., Machado, L., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behaviour. Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 29-39. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00186-8
36. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
37. Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984), Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
38. Verleger, R., & Möcks, J. (1987). Varimax may produce slow-wave-like shapes by merging monotonic trends with other components. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 265-270.
39. Verleger, R., Paehge, T., Kolev, V., Yordanova, J., & Jaśkowski, P. (2006). On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biological Psychology, 73, 298-313. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.05.005
40. Verleger, R., Paulick, C., Möcks, J., Smith, J. L., & Keller, K. (2013). Parfac and go/no-go: Disentangling CNV return from the P3 complex by trilinear component analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 289-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.003
41. Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3720190
42. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.