CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: A failure to replicate Simson et al.

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 349-357

  Smith, Janette L ^a   Barry, Robert J ^b   Steiner, Genevieve Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

CNV; Component overlap; Cue; Fixed interval; Go NoGo; Inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOPOGRAPHY; WAVEFORM;

CNV; COMPONENT OVERLAP; CUE; FIXED INTERVAL; GO/NOGO; INHIBITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885390978     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115(9):2001-2013.
2. Bekker E.M., Kenemans J.L., Verbaten M.N. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22:221-231.
3. Bruin K.J., Wijers A.A. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113:1172-1182.
4. Connor W.H., Lang P.J. Cortical slow-wave and cardiac rate responses in stimulus orientation and reaction time conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 82(2):310-320.
5. Damen E.J.P., Brunia C.H.M. Slow brain potentials related to movement and visual feedback in a response timing task. Biological Psychology 1985, 20:195.
6. Donald M.W., Goff W.R. Attention-related increases in cortical responsivity dissociated from the contingent negative variation. Science 1971, 172:1163-1166.
7. Donald M.W., Goff W.R. Contingent negative variation and sensory evoked responses: their interaction and relationship to auditory discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1973, 33:109-117. (Supplement).
8. Donchin E., Smith D.B.D. The contingent negative variation and the late positive wave of the average evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1970, 29:201-203.
9. Donchin E., Tueting P., Ritter W., Kutas M., Heffley E.F. On the independence of the CNV and the P300 components of the human averaged evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 38:449-461.
10. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychiatry 1993, 35:123-138.
11. Gehring W.J., Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18(1):198-216.
12. Hillyard S.A., Courchesne E., Krausz H.I., Picton T.W. Scalp topography of the P3 wave in different auditory decision tasks. The Responsive Brain 1976, 81-87. John Wright and Sons, Bristol. W.C. McCallum, J.R. Knott (Eds.).
13. Jarvilehto T., Fruhstorfer H. Differentiation between slow cortical potentials associated with motor and mental acts in man. Experimental Brain Research 1970, 11:309-317.
14. Jodo E., Inoue K. Effects of practice on the P300 in a Go/NoGo task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1990, 76:249-257.
15. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1992, 82(6):477-482.
16. Karlin L. Cognition, preparation, and sensory-evoked potentials. Psychological Bulletin 1970, 73(2):122-136.
17. Kok A. Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biological Psychology 1986, 23(1):21-38.
18. Kok A. Overlap between P300 and movement-related-potentials: a response to Verleger. Biological Psychology 1988, 27:51-58.
19. Kornhuber H.H., Deecke L. Hirnpotentialänderungen beim Menschen vor und nach Willkürbewegungen, dargestellt mit Magnetbandspeicherung und Rückwärtsanalyse. Pflügers Archiv 1964, 281:52.
20. Kornhuber H.H., Deecke L. Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passive bewegungen des menschen: Bereitschaftspotential une reafferente potentiale. Pflügers Archiv 1965, 284:1-17.
21. Lavric A., Pizzagalli D.A., Forstmeier S. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 20:2483-2488.
22. Mathalon D.H., Whitfield S.L., Ford J.M. Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biological Psychology 2003, 64(1-2):119-141.
23. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials 1985, 62(3):203-208.
24. Näätänen R. Evoked potential, EEG, and slow potential correlates of selective attention. Acta Psychologica 1970, 33:178-192.
25. Nativ A., Lazarus, J.C., Nativ J., Joseph J. Potentials associated with the initiation and inhibition of visually triggered finger movement in humans: the "NoGo potential" in the Go/NoGo paradigm. International Journal of Neuroscience 1992, 66:107-118.
26. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 3(1):17-26.
27. Oddy B.W., Barry R.J., Johnstone S.J., Clarke A.R. Removal of CNV effects from the N2 and P3 ERP components in a visual Go/NoGo task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19(1):24-34.
28. Pfefferbaum A., Ford J.M. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1988, 71:55-63.
29. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:127-152.
30. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., Ogden W.C. Attended and unattended processing modes: the role of set for spatial location. Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information 1978, 137-157. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. H.L. Pick, E. Saltzman (Eds.).
31. Roberts L.E., Rau H., Lutzenberger W., Birbaumer N. Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 92:44-55.
32. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifact, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23(6):695-703.
33. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1976, 40:33-42.
34. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1977, 42(4):528-535.
35. Simson R., Vaughan H.G., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual go/nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1977, 43:864-875.
36. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 61:121-133.
37. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:343-355.
38. Smith J.L., Johnstone S.J., Barry R.J. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119(3):704-714.
39. Smith J.L., Jamadar S., Provost A.L., Michie P.T. Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: an ERP and fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2013, 87:244-253.
40. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
41. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1996, HarperCollins, New York. third ed.
42. Tueting P., Sutton S. The relationship between prestimulus negative shifts and poststimulus components of the averaged evoked potential. Attention and Performance IV 1973, 185-207. Academic Press, New York. S. Kornblum (Ed.).
43. Van Boxtel G.J.M., Böcker K.B.E. Cortical measures of anticipation. Journal of Psychophysiology 2004, 18:61-76.
44. Verleger R., Paehge T., Kolev V., Yordanova J., Jaskowski P. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3. Biological Psychology 2006, 73(3):298-313.
45. Verleger R., Paulick C., Möcks J., Smith J.L., Keller K. Parafac and Go/No-Go: disentangling CNV return from the P3 complex by trilinear component analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2013, 87:289-300.
46. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
47. Weerts T.C., Lang P.J. The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV). Biological Psychology 1973, 1:1-19.
48. Wilkinson R.T., Ashby S.M. Selective attention, contingent negative variation and the evoked potential. Biological Psychology 1974, 1:167-179.
49. Wilkinson R.T., Spence M.V. Determinants of the post-stimulus resolution of contingent negative variation (CNV). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1973, 35:503-509.