Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2581-2589

  Sale, J E M ^a,b   Bogoch, E ^c,d   Hawker, G ^b,d,e   Gignac, M ^f,g   Beaton, D ^a,b   Jaglal, S ^g   Frankel, L ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Barriers to post fracture secondary prevention; BMD testing; Fragility fracture; Osteoporosis; Qualitative research; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PERCEPTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECONDARY PREVENTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PROCEDURES;

BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENT;

AGED; BONE DENSITY; BONE DENSITY CONSERVATION AGENTS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECONDARY PREVENTION;

EID: 84919845910     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2804-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Sale JEM, Beaton D, Posen J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2011) Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2067–82
2. Ganda KPM, Chen JS, Speerin R, Beasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406
3. Little EA, Eccles MP (2010) A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Implement Sci 5:80
4. Beaton D, Dyer S, Jiang D, Sujic R, Slater M, Sale J et al (2013) Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: Results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's Fracture Clinic Screening Program. Osteoporos Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2430-6
5. Sale JEM, Beaton DE, Sujic R, Bogoch ER (2010) If it was osteoporosis, I would have really hurt myself. Ambiguity about osteoporosis and osteoporosis care despite a screening program to educate fracture patients. J Eval Clin Pract 16(3):590–6
6. Sale JEM, Beaton D, Fraenkel L, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2010) The BMD muddle: the disconnect between bone densitometry results and perception of bone health. J Clin Densitom 13(4):370–8
7. Sale J, Gignac M, Hawker G, Frankel L, Beaton D, Bogoch E et al (2011) Decision to take osteoporosis medication in patients who have had a fracture and are 'high' risk for future fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:92
8. Blonk MC, Erdtsieck RJ, Wernekinck MG, Schoon EJ (2007) The fracture and osteoporosis clinic: 1-year results and 3-month compliance. Bone 40(6):1643–9
9. Cuddihy MT, Amadio PC, Gabriel SE, Pankratz VS, Kurland RL, Melton LJ III (2004) A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(9):695–700
10. Astrand J, Thorngren KG, Tagil M (2006) One fracture is enough! Experience with a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program with 239 fracture patients. Acta Orthop 77(1):3–8
11. Tosi LL, Gliklich R, Kannan K, Koval KJ (2008) The American Orthopaedic Association's "own the bone" initiative to prevent secondary fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 90(1):163–73
12. Schmid L, Henzen C, Schlumpf U, Babst R (2004) Improving secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients: the impact of a simple clinical information procedure. J Appl Res 4(4):570–5
13. Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS, Hanley DA et al (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178(5):569–75
14. Hegeman JH, Willemsen G, van Nieuwpoort J, Kreeftenberg HG, van der Veer E, Slaets JPJ et al (2005) Effective case-finding of osteoporosis in a Fracture and Osteoporosis Clinic in Groningen: an analysis of the first 100 patients. Aktuelle Traumatologie 35(1):34–39
15. Harrington JT, Lease J (2007) Osteoporosis disease management for fragility fracture patients: new understandings based on three years' experience with an osteoporosis care service. Arthritis Rheum (Arthritis Care Res) 57(8):1502–6
16. Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Bansod V, Salbach NM, Zwarenstein M, Carroll J et al (2009) A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 20(2):265–74
17. Harrington JT, Barash HL, Day S, Lease J (2005) Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project. Arthritis Rheum 53(2):198–204
18. Ho C, Cranney A, Campbell A (2006) Measuring the impact of pharmacist intervention: results of patient education about osteoporosis after fragility fracture. Can J Hosp Pharm 59(4):184–93
19. Gallacher SJ (2005) Setting up an osteoporosis fracture liaison service: background and potential outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 6:1081–94
20. Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(9):1309–17
21. Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Demetrakopoulos D, Koob J, Hong R, Rana A et al (2005) Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective, randomized trial.[see comment]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(1):3–7
22. Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Cameron C, Canavan J, Beaton D, Bogoch E et al (2010) The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada. Osteoporos Int 21:903–8
23. Papaioannou A, Leslie WD, Morin S, Atkinson S, Brown J, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 182(17):1864–73
24. Morse JM (1994) Designing funded qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 220–35
25. Schwandt TA (2001) Dictionary of qualitative inquiry, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks
26. Jasper MA (1994) Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. J Adv Nurs 19:309–14
27. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series, Geneva
28. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown J, Feldman S et al (2010) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: Background and technical report. Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto
29. Leslie WD, Berger C, Langsetmo L, Lix LM, Adachi JD, Hanley D et al (2011) Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: Results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1873–83
30. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Min Res 25(11):2350–8
31. Giorgi A (2008) Concerning a serious misunderstanding of the essence of the phenomenological method in psychology. J Phenomenol Psychol 39:33–58
32. Wertz FJ (2005) Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52(2):167–77
33. Gearing RE (2004) Bracketing in research: a typology. Qual Health Res 14(10):1429–52
34. Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H, Hodsman A, Josse RG, Khan A et al (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56(3):178–88
35. Giorgi A (1989) Some theoretical and practical issues regarding the psychological phenomenological method. Saybrook Rev 7:71–85
36. Giorgi A (1997) The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenomenol Psychol 28:235–60
37. Polkinghorne DE (1989) Phenomenological research methods. In: Valle RS, Halling S (eds) Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 41–60
38. Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
39. Sale JEM, Gignac M, Hawker G, Frankel L, Beaton D, Bogoch E et al (2012) Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture—a new understanding based on fracture patients' communication. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2829–34
40. Kahneman D, Klein G (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise. Am Psychol 64(6):515–26
41. Schwartz EN, Steinberg D (2005) Detection of vertebral fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep 3:126–35
42. Siminoski K, Jiang G, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Cline G, Ioannidis G et al (2005) Accuracy of height loss during prospective monitoring for detection of incident vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:403–10
43. Allin S, Munce SSAM, Hawker G, Murphy K, Jaglal SB (2013) Quality of fracture risk assessment in post-fracture care in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 24:899–905
44. Kingwell E, Prior JC, Ratner PA, Kennedy SM (2010) Direct-to-participant feedback and awareness of bone mineral density testing results in a population-based sample of mid-aged Canadians. Osteoporos Int 21:307–19
45. Allin S, Munce S, Carlin L, Butt D, Sale J, Jaglal S (2014) Interpreting BMD results: whose job is it, anyway? Osteoporos Int 25(5):1445–53
46. Beaton D, Mamdani M, Zheng H, Jaglal S, Cadarette S, Jain R et al (2013) Impact of a case finding intervention on fracture risk reduction outcomes following fragility fractures. The 2nd Fragility Fracture Network Global Congress, Berlin
47. Summerskill WSM, Pope C (2002) I saw the panic in her eyes, and evidence-based medicine went out of the door. An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease. Fam Pract 19(6):605–10