Fracture risk assessment after BMD examination: Whose job is it, anyway?

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1445-1453

  Allin, S ^a,b   Munce, S ^a,c   Carlin, L ^a   Butt, D ^d,e   Tu, K ^d,e   Hawker, G ^e,f   Sale, J ^c,g   Jaglal, S ^a,b,c,d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^g ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Fracture risk assessment; Osteoporosis; Qualitative research; Radiology; Reporting

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; CANADA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDIZATION; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WORK EXPERIENCE; BONE DENSITY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BONE DENSITY; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; ONTARIO; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84899632084     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2661-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182(17):1864-1873
2. Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Indications and reporting for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7(1):37-44
3. Siminosk K, O'Keeffe M, Lévesque J, Hanley D, Brown JP (2010) CAR technical standards for bone mineral densitometry reporting. http://www.car.ca/uploads/standards%20guidelines/201001-en-car-bmd-technical- standards.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
4. Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H, Hodsman A, Josse RG, Khan A, Lentle BC, Lévesque J, Lyons DJ, Tarulli G, Brown JP, Canadian Association of Radiologists (2005) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 56(3):178-188
5. Allin S, Munce S, Schott AM, Hawker G, Murphy K, Jaglal SB (2013) Quality of fracture risk assessment in post-fracture care in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 24(3):899-905
6. Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Petak SM (2006) DXA quality matters. J Clin Densitom 9(4):388-392
7. Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K (2013) Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture. Complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. J Bone Miner Res 28(8):1701-1717
8. Lentle B, Cheung AM, Hanley DA, Leslie WD, Lyons D, Papaioannou A, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hodsman AB, Jamal AS, Josse RG, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Morin S, Siminoski K, Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2011) Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk. Can Assoc Radiol J 62(4):243-250
9. Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organisation Scientific Group (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases. http://www.iofbonehealth.org/ sites/default/files/WHO-Technical-Report-2007.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
10. Zhang J, Delzell E, Zhao H, Laster AJ, Saag KG, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA, Wright NC, Yun H, Curtis J (2012) Central DXA utilization shifts from office-based to hospital-based settings among medicare beneficiaries in the wake of reimbursement changes. J Bone Miner Res 27(4):858-864
11. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario, Canada. Changes to schedule of facility fees. Bulletin Number 2053, 2008 April 18. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/bulletins/2000/bul2053.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
12. Jaglal S, Hawker G, Croxford R, Cameron C, Munce S, Allin S. (2012) Impact of a reimbursement change on bone mineral density testing in Ontario, Canada. Plenary Poster Presentation, American Society for Bone Mineral Research 2012 Annual Meeting. http://www.asbmr.org/Meetings/AnnualMeeting/AbstractDetail. aspx?aid=4505c913-a92c-4b15-b913-20eb2fe9ac01. Accessed 3 Mar 2014.
13. Oppermann B, Ayoub W, Newman E, Wood GC, Olenginski TP (2010) Consultative DXA reporting improves guideline-driven quality of care-implications for increasing DXA reimbursement. J Clin Densitom 13(3):315-319
14. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77-101
15. Sandelowski M (2010) What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 33:77-84
16. Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23:334-340
17. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks
18. Pope C, Mays N (eds) (2006) Qualitative research in health care, III edn. BMJ Books, London
19. Çetin A, Özgüçlü E, Özçakar L, AkIncI A (2008) Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice. Clin Rheumatol 27(6):713-715
20. The ISCD Certification Program. http://www.iscd.org/certification/. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
21. Lewiecki EM, Lane N (2008) Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing. Nat Rev Rheumatol 4:667-674
22. Spelic D, Kaczmarek R, Hilohi M, Belella S (2007) United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomed Imaging Interv J 3(2):e35
23. Suleiman OH, Spelic DC, McCrohan JL, Symonds GR, Houn F (1999) Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada. Radiology 210(2):345-351
24. List of United States facilities accredited by the ISCD. http://www.iscd.org/accreditation/accredited-facilities/. Accessed 24 Jan 2014.
25. Chen Z, Kooperberg C, Pettinger MB, Bassford T, Cauley JA, LaCroix AZ, Lewis CE, Kipersztok S, Borne C, Jackson RD (2004) Validity of self-report for fractures among a multiethnic cohort of postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative observational study and clinical trials. Menopause 11(3):264-274
26. HLTH1905 Standard Outpt Bone Densitometry Requisition. British Columbia Radiological Society. http://medstaff.providencehealthcare.org/media/ HLTH1905%20Standard%20Outpatient%20Bone%20Densitometry%20Requisition%20(Jun-06) scan.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2014.
27. Leslie WD, Berger C, Langsetmo L, Lix LM, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Ioannidis G, Josse RG, Kovacs CS, Towheed T, Kaiser S, Olszynski WP, Prior JC, Jamal S, Kreiger N, Goltzman D, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group (2011) Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1873-1883
28. Binkley N, Krueger D (2009) What should DXA reports contain? Preferences of ordering health care providers. J Clin Densitom 12(1):5-10
29. Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol. 64(4):386-394; 395-396.