Effects of grip force on skin conductance measured from a handheld device

Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 8-19

  Tartz, Robert ^a   Vartak, Aniket ^a   King, Jay ^a   Fowles, Don ^b  

^a QUALCOMM INC   (United States)

^b University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

EDA; EDR; Electrodermal activity; Electrodermal response; Galvanic skin response; Grip force; GSR; Mobile devices; Skin conductance; Smartphones

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; DEVICES; ELECTRODE; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PHYSIOLOGY; SMARTPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; ELECTRODES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; SMARTPHONE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919667686     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12237     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal activity (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
2. Boucsein, W., Fowles, D. C., Grimnes, S., Ben-Shakhar, G., Roth, W. T., Dawson, M. E., & Filion, D. L. (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 49, 1017-1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x
3. Bradley, M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 602-642). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1996). Probing picture perception: Activation and emotion. Psychophysiology, 33, 103-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02114.x
5. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 159-181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.yalepeplab.com/teaching/psych231_fall2012/documents/231_Dawson2007.pdf
6. Deltombe, T., Hanson, P., Jamart, J., & Clerin, M. (1998). The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects. Muscle & Nerve, 21, 34-39. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199801)21:1<34::AID-MUS5>3.0.CO;2-H
7. Doberenz, S., Roth, W. T., Wollburg, E., Maslowski, N. I., & Kim, S. (2011). Methodological considerations in ambulatory skin conductance monitoring. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80, 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.002
8. Ebbecke, U. (1921). Die lokale galvanische Reaktion der Haut. Uber die Beziehung zwischen lokaler Reizung und elektrischer Leitfahigkeit. [The local galvanic skin response. About the relationship between local irritation and electrical conductivity.] Pflugers Arch. Ges. Physiol., 190, 230-269.
9. Edelberg, R. (1964a). Independence of galvanic skin response amplitude and sweat production. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 42, 443-448.
10. Edelberg, R. (1964b). Effect of vasoconstriction on galvanic skin response amplitude. Journal of Applied Physiology, 19, 427-430.
11. Edelberg, R. (1967). Electrical properties of the skin. In C. C. Brown (Ed.), Methods in psychophysiology (pp. 1-53). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Co.
12. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.). (1996). Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
13. Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment-Monitoring behavior in daily life settings: A behavioral-scientific challenge for psychology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206-213. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.20
14. Fowles, D. C., & Schneider, R. E. (1978). Electrolyte medium effects on measurements of palmar skin potential. Psychophysiology, 15, 474-482. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01418.x
15. Kappeler-Setz, C., Gravenhorst, F., Schumm, J., Arnrich, B., & Tröster, G. (2011). Towards long term monitoring of electrodermal activity in daily life. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17, 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0463-4
16. Majumdar, S., Vartak, A., & Tartz, R. (2013). U.S. Patent Application No. 13, 734, 947. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
17. Poh, M., Swenson, N., & Picard, R. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57, 1243-1252. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487
18. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714
19. Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Schumm, J., La Marca, R., Troster, R., & Ehlert, U. (2010). Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14, 410-417. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164
20. Stewart, C., Hoggan, E., Haverinen, L., Salamin, H., & Jacucci, G. (2012). An exploration of inadvertent variations in mobile pressure input. Paper presented at MobileHCI'12, San Francisco, CA. doi: 10.1145/2371574.2371581
21. Tartz, R., Vartak, A., & King, J. (2012). Measurement of electrodermal activity using polarity switching on stainless steel electrodes. Poster presented at the 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Diego, CA.
22. Wilcott, R. C. (1958). Effects of local blood removal on skin resistance and potential. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 295-300. doi: 10.1037/h0039672
23. Wilcott, R. C. (1960). A comparison of palmar and nonpalmar skin conductance. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53, 38-41. doi: 10.1037/h0039672
24. Wilhelm, F. H., Pfaltz, M. C., Grossman, P., & Roth, W. T. (2006). Distinguishing emotional from physical activation in ambulatory psychophysiological monitoring. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 42, 458-463.