Fuzzy risk explicit interval linear programming model for end-of-life vehicle recycling planning in the EU

Waste Management

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 265-282

  Simic, Vladimir ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Decision maker preference type; End of life vehicle; EU ELV directive; Fuzzy risk explicit interval linear programming; Uncertainty; Cut level

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEAT TREATMENT; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SCRAP METAL REPROCESSING; SOLID WASTES; VEHICLES; WASTE TREATMENT;

DECISION MAKER PREFERENCES; ELV DIRECTIVE; END-OF-LIFE VEHICLES; INTERVAL LINEAR PROGRAMMING; UNCERTAINTY;

RECYCLING;

EUROPEAN UNION; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; LINEAR PROGRAMING; MODELING; PLANNING METHOD; RECYCLING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; END OF LIFE VEHICLE; EUROPEAN UNION; FUZZY RISK EXPLICIT INTERVAL LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL; FUZZY SYSTEM; LANDFILL; LAW; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTOR VEHICLE; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; RECYCLING; STATISTICAL MODEL; CAR; ECONOMICS; FUZZY LOGIC; PROCEDURES; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMOBILES; DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN UNION; FUZZY LOGIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROGRAMMING, LINEAR; RECYCLING; UNCERTAINTY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84919634977     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Amaral J., Ferrao P., Rosas C. Is recycling technology innovation a major driver for technology shift in the automobile industry under an EU context?. Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage. 2006, 6(4):385-398.
2. American Metal Market (AMM), 2013. Scrap Prices. (accessed 24.12.13). http://www.amm.com/Pricing.html.
3. Bandivadekar A.P., Kumar V., Gunter K.L., Sutherland J.W. A model for material flows and economic exchanges within the U.S. automotive life cycle chain. J. Manuf. Syst. 2004, 23(1):22-29.
4. Bin Mohd I., Suprajitno H. Linear programming with interval arithmetic. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 2010, 5(7):323-332.
5. Boon J.E., Isaacs J.A., Gupta S.M. End-of-life infrastructure economics for clean vehicles in the United States. J. Ind. Ecol. 2003, 7:25-45.
6. Centre for Sustainable Manufacturing and Reuse/Recycling Technologies (SMART), 2006. Post-Fragmentation Modeler. Loughborough University, UK. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.centreforsmart.co.uk/download%20pages.html.
7. CEWEP, 2011. CEWEP Country Report 2010. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.cewep.eu/information/data/subdir/442._Country_Report_on_Waste_Management.html.
8. CEWEP, 2012. Landfill Taxes & Bans. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.cewep.eu/media/www.cewep.eu/org/med_557/955_2012-04-27_cewep_-_landfill_taxes__bans_website.pdf.
9. Cheah, L.W., Evans, C., Bandivadekar, A., Heywood, J., 2007. Factor of Two: Halving the Fuel Consumption of New U.S. Automobiles by 2035. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://web.mit.edu/sloan-auto-lab/research/beforeh2/files/cheah_factorTwo.pdf.
10. Cherrington R., Goodship V., Meredith J., Wood B.M., Coles S.R., Vuillaume A., et al. Producer responsibility: defining the incentive for recycling composite wind turbine blades in Europe. Energ. Policy. 2012, 47:13-21.
11. Chinneck J.W., Ramadan K. Linear programming with interval coefficients. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2000, 51(2):209-220.
12. Choi J.-K., Stuart J.A., Ramani K. Modeling of automotive recycling planning in the United States. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2005, 6:413-419.
13. Ciacci L., Morselli L., Passarini F., Santini A., Vassura I. A comparison among different automotive shredder residue treatment processes. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 2010, 15:896-906.
14. Coates G., Rahimifard S. A cost estimation framework to support increased value recovery from end-of-life vehicles. Int. J. Comp. Integ. Manuf. 2008, 21(8):895-910.
15. Coates G., Rahimifard S. Modelling of post-fragmentation waste stream processing within UK shredder facilities. Waste Manage. 2009, 29(1):44-53.
16. Dantec, D., 2005. Analysis of the Cost of Recycling Compliance for the Automobile Industry. MSc Thesis. The Engineering Systems Division of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
17. Davis, S.C., Boundy, R.G., Diegel, S.W., 2012a. 2011 Vehicle Technologies Market Report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, report # ORNL/TM-2012/016, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://cta.ornl.gov/vtmarketreport/pdf/2011_vtmarketreport_full_doc.pdf.
18. Davis, S.C., Diegel, S.W., Boundy, R.G., 2012b. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 31. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis, Energy and Transportation Science Division, report # ORNL-6987, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://cta.ornl.gov/data/download31.shtml.
19. EU Directive 2000/53/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles. Off. J. Eur. Union 2000, L269:34-42.
20. Eurostat, 2013a. Electricity Prices for Medium Size Industrial Consumers in Euro Area, Changing Composition (Code: ten00117). (accessed 22.12.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/energy/data/main_tables.
21. Eurostat, 2013b. Eurobase: Complete Data on End-of-Life Vehicles. (accessed 22.12.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/waste/key_waste_streams/end_of_life_vehicles_elvs.
22. Eurostat, 2013c. HICP - Annual Average Indices for Transport Prices (Code: teicp070). (accessed 22.12.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table%26init=1%26language=en%26pcode=teicp070%26plugin=1.
23. Eurostat, 2013d. HICP - Inflation Rate (Code: tec00118). (accessed 22.12.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/hicp/data/main_tables.
24. Eurostat, 2013e. Labour Costs Annual Data - Nace Rev. 2 (Hourly Labour Costs; Water Supply, Sewerage, Waste Management and Remediation Activities; Size Class - 10 Employees or More) (Code: tps00173). (accessed 22.12.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/labour_market/labour_costs/main_tables.
25. Farel R., Yannou B., Ghaffari A., Leroy Y. A cost and benefit analysis of future end-of-life vehicle glazing recycling in France: a systematic approach. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2013, 74:54-65.
26. Ferrao P., Amaral J. Assessing the economics of auto recycling activities in relation to European Union Directive on end of life vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2006, 73:277-289.
27. Ferrao P., Nazareth P., Amaral J. Strategies for meeting EU ELV reuse/recovery targets. J. Ind. Ecol. 2006, 10:77-93.
28. Fiore S., Ruffino B., Zanetti M.C. Automobile shredder residues in Italy: characterization and valorization opportunities. Waste Manage. 2012, 32(8):1548-1559.
29. Gaidajis G., Angelakoglou K., Botsaris P.N., Filippidou F. Analysis of the recycling potential of used automotive oil filters using the Life Cycle Assessment approach. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2011, 55(11):986-994.
30. Gaillot, O., McCormack, I., 2010. Depollution and Shredder Trial Report on End of Life Vehicles in Ireland. Ireland Environmental Protection Agency. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.srcosmos.gr/srcosmos/showpub.aspx?aa=14261.
31. GHK/BioIS, 2006. A Study to Examine the Benefits of the End of Life Vehicles Directive and the Costs and Benefits of a Revision of the 2015 Targets for Recycling, Re-use and Recovery under the ELV Directive - Final Report to DG Environment. Birmingham, UK. (accessed 10.04.14). http://http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/study/final_report.pdf.
32. Harris, 2013. Ferrous Brochures. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.harrisequip.com/products/shredders/.
33. Huang G.H., Baetz B.W., Patry G.G. A grey fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civil. Eng. Syst. 1993, 10:123-146.
34. Institute of Scrap Recycling industries, Inc. (ISRI), 2013. Scrap Specifications Circular - Guidelines for Nonferrous Scrap, Ferrous Scrap, Glass Cullet, Paper Stock, Plastic Scrap, Electronics Scrap, Tire Scrap (Effective 10/25/2012). Washington, DC, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.isri.org/specs.
35. Iranpour R., Zhao J., Wang A., Yang F., Li X. Research of value analysis oriented end of life vehicle dismantling and recycling process. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 518-523:3450-3454.
36. Janicka, A., Kolanek, C., Walkowiak, W., 2011. Ecology of Road Transportation. The Logistic System of End-of-Life Vehicles Recycling. Poland: PRINTPAP Łódz, pp. 5.
37. Jekel L.J., Tam E.K.L. Plastics waste processing: comminution size distribution and prediction. J. Environ. Eng-ASCE 2007, 133(2):245-254.
38. Jody, B., Daniels, E.J., Duranceau, C.M., Pomykala Jr, J.A., Spangenberger, J.S., 2010. End-of-life Vehicle Recycling: The State of the Art of Resource Recovery from Shredder Residue. Argonne National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.ipd.anl.gov/anlpubs/2011/02/69114.pdf.
39. Johnson M.R., Wang M.H. Evaluation policies and automotive recovery options according to the European Union directive on end-of-life vehicles (ELV). Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Autom. Eng. 2002, 216:723-739.
40. Kumar V., Sutherland J.W. Sustainability of the automotive recycling infrastructure: review of current research and identification of future challenges. Int. J. Sust. Manuf. 2008, 1:145-167.
41. Kumar V., Sutherland J.W. Development and assessment of strategies to ensure economic sustainability of the U.S. automotive recovery infrastructure. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2009, 53(8):470-477.
42. Li P., Dahmus J., Guldberg S., Riddervold H.O., Kirchain R. How much sorting is enough: identifying economic and scrap-reuse benefits of sorting technologies. J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15:743-759.
43. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Yang Z.F., Nie S.L. IFMP: Interval-fuzzy multistage programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2008, 52:800-812.
44. Liu Y., Zou R., Guo H. Risk explicit interval linear programming model for uncertainty-based nutrient-reduction optimization for the lake Qionghai Watershed. J. Water. Res. Pl-ASCE 2011, 137(1):83-91.
45. Moore R.E. Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis: SIAM Studies in Applied and Numerical Mathematics 1979, SIAM, Philadelphia.
46. Olugu E.U., Wong K.Y. An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39:375-384.
47. Pei, W., 2011. A FREILP Approach for Long-term Planning of MSW Management System in HRM, Canada. MSc Thesis, Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
48. Qu X., Williams J.A.S. An analytical model for reverse automotive production planning and pricing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 190:756-767.
49. Recycler's World, 2013. Scrap Copper Recycling Category. (accessed 22.12.13). http://www.recycle.net/Metal-N/Copper/%20index.html?affilid=100029.
50. Ruffino B., Fiore S., Zanetti M.C. Strategies for the enhancement of automobile shredder residues (ASRs) recycling: results and cost assessment. Waste Manage. 2014, 34(1):148-155.
51. Scrap Price Bulletin (SPB), 2013. Ferrous Scrap Prices - Birmingham. (accessed 24.12.13). http://www.scrappricebulletin.com/Prices.aspx#BI.
52. Sengupta A., Kumar Pal T., Chakraborty D. Interpretation of inequality constraints involving interval coefficients and a solution to interval linear programming. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2001, 119(1):129-138.
53. Simic V., Dimitrijevic B. Modelling of automobile shredder residue recycling in the Japanese legislative context. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40(18):7159-7167.
54. Simic V., Dimitrijevic B. Modelling production processes in a vehicle recycling plant. Waste Manage. Res. 2012, 30:940-948.
55. Simic V., Dimitrijevic B. Production planning for vehicle recycling factories in the EU legislative and global business environments. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2012, 60:78-88.
56. Simic V. A decade of the automobile shredder residue problem - a review of the state-of-the-art. Metal. Int. 2013, 18(4):210-215.
57. Simic V. End-of-life vehicle recycling - a review of the state-of-the-art. The. Vjesn. 2013, 20(2):371-380.
58. Tasala Gradin K., Luttropp C., Björklund A. Investigating improved vehicle dismantling and fragmentation technology. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 54:23-29.
59. Tong S.C. Interval number, fuzzy number linear programming. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 1994, 66(3):301-306.
60. Vermeulen I., Block C., Van Caneghem J., Dewulf W., Sikdar S.K. Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes: the case of automotive shredder residue. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2012, 69:17-28.
61. Vigano F., Consonni S., Grosso M., Rigamonti L. Material and energy recovery from automotive shredded residues (ASR) via sequential gasification and combustion. Waste Manage. 2010, 30:145-153.
62. Warner, S., Brown, M., 2008. Review of Proposals - Johnson Canyon Resource Management Park. Salinas Valley - Solid Waste Authority, CA, USA. (accessed 10.04.14). http://www.svswa.org/pdf/agendas/ctc/2008/2008-10-29/10-29-08%20CTC%20Agenda%20Packets.pdf.
63. Williams J.A.S., Wongweragiat S., Qu X., McGlinch J.B., Bonawi-tan W., Choi J.K., et al. An automotive bulk recycling planning model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 177:969-981.
64. Yang P., Dong F., Liu Y., Zou R., Chen X., Huaicheng G. A refined risk explicit interval linear programming approach for optimal watershed load reduction with objective-constraint uncertainty tradeoff analysis. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014. 10.1007/s11783-014-0683-8.
65. Zhang X., Huang K., Zou R., Liu Y., Yu Y. A risk explicit interval linear programming model for uncertainty-based environmental economic optimization in the lake Fuxian Watershed, China. Sci. World J. 2013, ID 824078.
66. Zimmermann H.-J. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications 1985, Kluwer-Nijhoff: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
67. Zou R., Liu Y., Liu L., Guo H.C. REILP approach for uncertainty-based decision making in civil engineering. J. Comput. Civil. Eng. 2010, 24(4):357-364.
68. Zou R., Liu Y., Riverson J., Parker A., Carter S. A nonlinearity interval mapping scheme for efficient waste load allocation simulation-optimization analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46(8):W08530.