UHMWPE-based nanocomposite as a material for damaged cartilage replacement

Materials Science and Engineering C

Volumn 48, Issue , 2015, Pages 566-571

  Senatov, Fedor S ^a   Kopylov, A N ^b   Anisimova, N Yu ^b   Kiselevsky, M V ^b   Maksimkin, A V ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MISIS   (Russian Federation)

^b N N BLOKHIN RUSSIAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Cartilage regeneration; Implant; Knee joint; Polymer composite; Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene; Wear resistance

Indexed keywords

CARTILAGE; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; DEFECTS; DISPERSIONS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINTS (ANATOMY); MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOCOMPOSITES; NEURAL PROSTHESES; NONMETALLIC MATRIX COMPOSITES; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

CARTILAGE DEFECTS; CARTILAGE REGENERATION; CARTILAGE REPLACEMENTS; CELLULAR INFILTRATION; IMPLANTED SAMPLES; KNEE JOINT; MECHANICAL ACTIVATION; POLYMER COMPOSITE;

WEAR RESISTANCE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE;

ANIMAL; CARTILAGE; CHEMISTRY; FRACTURES, CARTILAGE; MALE; METABOLISM; PATHOLOGY; RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; CARTILAGE; FRACTURES, CARTILAGE; MALE; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYETHYLENES; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 84919609027     PISSN: 09284931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.050     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. B. Vladimir, J. Noble, British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery, J. Bone Joint Surg. V82 (2000) 165-166.
2. J. Perera, P. Gikas, G. Bentley, The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 94 (2012) 381-387, http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221592573.
3. S. Redman, S. Oldfield, C. Archer, Current strategies for articular cartilage repair, Eur. Cell Mater. 9 (2005) 23-32.
4. A. Lynn, R. Brooks, V. Bonfield, N. Rushton, Repair of defects in articular joints, J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.) 86 (8) (2004) 1093-1099.
5. S.Mastbergen, D. Saris, F. Lafeber, Functional articular cartilage repair: here, near, or is the best approach not yet clear? Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 9 (5) (2013) 277-290.
6. Steven M. Kurtz, UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook, Second edition, 2009., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374721-1.00039-0.
7. D. Xiong, J. Lin, D. Fan, Wear properties of nano-Al203 UHMWPE composites irradiated by gamma ray against a CoCrMo alloy, Biomed. Mater. 1 (3) (2006) 175-179.
8. S. Li, A. Burstein, Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Thematerial and its use in total joint implants, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 76 (1994) 1080-1090.
9. G. Lewis, Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 38 (1997) 55-75.
10. W. Sauer, M. Anthony, Predicting the clinical wear performance of orthopedic bearing surfaces, in: J. Jacobs, T. Craig (Eds.), Alternative Bearing Surfaces in Total Joint Replacement, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohoken, 1998.
11. A. Essner, V. Polineni, G. Schmidig, A. Wang, C. Stark, J. Dumbleton, Long-term Wear Simulation of Stabilized UHMWPE Acetabular Cups, Transactions of the 43rd Orthopedic Research Society, Poster 784, San Francisco, CA, 1997.
12. C. Geerdink, B. Grimm, R. Ramakrishnan, J. Rondhuis, A. Verburg, A. Tonino, Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study, Acta Orthop. V77 (5) (2006) 719-725.
13. S. Kurtz, M. Manley, A.Wang, S. Taylor, J. Dumbleton, Comparison of the properties of annealed crosslinked (Crossfire) and conventional polyethylene as hip bearing materials, Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis. 61 (1 & 2) (2003) 17-26.
14. R. Gsell, K. Lee, C. Chu, S. Lin, Minimization oxidative degradation on gamma sterilization, Trans 5th World Biomat Cong, 1996, p. 191.
15. V. Premnath, W. Harris, M. Jasty, E. Merrill, Gamma sterilization of UHMWPE articular implants: an analysis of the oxidation problem, Biomaterials 17 (1996) 1741-1753.
16. J. Henry, A. Garton, Oxidation of polyethylene in water and aqueous salts, J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 28 (1990) 945-948.
17. A. Edidin, C. Jewett, K. Kwarteng, A. Kalinowski, Kurtz, Degradation of mechanical behavior in UHMWPE after natural and accelerated aging, Biomaterials V21 (2000) 1451-1460.
18. F. Senatov, M. Gorshenkov, V. Tcherdyntsev, S. Kaloshkin, V. Sudarchikov, Fractographic analysis of composites based on ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, Compos. Part B 56 (2014) 869-875, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.083.
19. J. Katta, Z. Jin, E. Ingham, J. Fisher, Effect of nominal stress on the long term friction, predicting the clinical wear deformation and wear of native and glycosaminoglycan deficient articular cartilage, Osteoarthr. Cartil. 17 (2009) 662-668.
20. L. McCann, E. Ingham, Z. Jin, J. Fisher, Influence of the meniscus on friction and degradation of cartilage in the natural knee joint, Osteoarthr. Cartil. 17 (2009) 995-1000.
21. I. Basalo, N. Chahine, M. Kaplun, F. Chen, C. Hung, C. Ateshian, Chondroitin sulfate reduces the friction coeffi cient of articular cartilage, J. Biomech. V40 (2007) 1847-1854.
22. S. Bazhenov, Fillers: their effect on the failure modes of plastics, Plastics Additives, Chapmen and Hall, London, New York, Madras, 1998. 252.
23. F. Senatov, M. Gorshenkov, S. Kaloshkin, V. Tcherdyntsev, N. Anisimova, A. Kopylov, M. Kiselevsky, Biocompatible polymer composites based on ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene perspective for cartilage defects replacement, J. Alloys Compd. 586 (2014) 544-547, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.014.
24. R. Roeder, G. Converse, R. Kane, W. Yue, Hydroxyapatite-reinforced polymer biocomposites for synthetic bone substitutes, JOM 60 (3) (2008) 38-45.
25. C. Grant, L. Wilson, C. Langton, D. Epari, Comparison of mechanical and ultrasound elastic modulus of ovine tibial cortical bone, Med. Eng. Phys. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.03.012.
26. J. Keyak, T. Kaneko, J. Tehranzadeh, H. Skinner, Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (2005) 219-228.
27. H. Yamada, Strength of Biological Materials, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1970. 106-137.
28. F. Senatov, A. Baranov, D. Muratov, M. Gorshenkov, S. Kaloshkin, V. Tcherdyntsev, Microstructure and properties of compositematerials based on UHMWPE aftermechanical activation, J. Alloys Compd. V615 (S1) (2014) S573-S577, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.175.