Sender-Receiver Constellations as a Moderator of Linguistic Abstraction Biases

Stereotype Dynamics: Language-Based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance, and Transformation of Stereotypes

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 213-237

  Freytag, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919518590     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809990-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Arcuri, L., Maass, A., and Portelli, G. (1993).Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology 32 277-285.
2. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182.
3. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. E. (1991).Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition 127- 149 Washington: American Psychological Association
5. Clark, H. H., and Schober, M. F. (1992).Asking questions and influencing answers. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys 15-48 New York: Russell Sage Foundation
6. Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., and McGarty, C. (2000).Strategic language use in interpersonal and intergroup communication. In Y. Kashima, V. Fiedler, and D. Freytas (eds.). Stereotype Dynamics: Language-based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes 191-217 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum
7. Douglas, K. M., and McGarty, C. (2001).Identifiability and self-presentation: Computermediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology 40 399-416.
8. Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. (2003).Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 682-696.
9. Fazio, R. H. (1995).Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences 247-282 Mahwah: Erlbaum
10. Fazio, R. H. (2001).On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion 15 115-141.
11. Fiedler, K., Bluemke, M., Friese, M., and Hofmann, W. (2003).On the different uses of linguistic abstractness: From LIB to LEB and beyond. European Journal of Social Psychology 33 441-453.
12. Fiedler, K. Semin, G. R., and Koppetsch, C. (1991).Language use and attributional biases in close personal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 147-155.
13. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1979).Subjective sensitivity analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23 339-359.
14. Franco, F. M., and Maass, A. (1996).Implicit versus explicit strategies of out-group discrimination. The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15 335-359.
15. Gil de Montes, L., Semin, G. R., and Valencia, J. F. (2003).Communication patterns in interdependent relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22 259-281.
16. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Sematics 3: Speech acts, (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
17. Higgins, E. T. (1981).The ‘communication game’: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition:The Ontario symposium 343-392 Hillsdale: Erlbaum
18. Higgins, T. E. (1992).Achieving “shared reality” in the communication game: A social action that creates meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 11 107-131.
19. Karasawa, M. (2005).The linguistic intergroup bias in the context of message transmission Paper presented at the 14th General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology at the University of Wuerzburg, Germany.
20. Karpinski, A., and von Hippel, W. (1996).The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectancy maintenance. Social Cognition 14 141-163.
21. Kashima, Y. (2000). Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 5 94-604.
22. Krauss, R. M., and Fussel, S. R. (1996).Social psychological models of interpersonal communication.In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 655-701 New York: Guilford Press
23. Lyons, A., and Kashima, Y. (2003).How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 989-1005.
24. Maass, A. (1999).Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language.In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 31 79-121 San Diego: Academic Press
25. Maass, A., Ceccarelli, R., and Rudin, S. (1996).Linguistic intergroup bias: evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 512-526.
26. Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., and Stahlberg, D. (1995).Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 116-126.
27. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., and Semin, G. R. (1989).Language use in intergroup contexts:The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 981-993.
28. McIntyre, A., Lyons, A., and Clark, A. (2004).The microgenesis of culture: Serial reproduction as an experimental simulation of cultural dynamics. In M. Schaller and C. S. Crandall (Eds.), Psychological foundations of culture 227-258 Mahwah:Erlbaum
29. Platt, J. R. (1964).Strong inference. Science 146 347-353.
30. Schmid, J. (1999).Pinning down attributions: the linguistic category model applied to wrestling reports. European Journal of Social Psychology 29 895-907.
31. Schmid, J., and Fiedler, K. (1996).Language and implicit attributions in the Nuremberg trials: Analyzing prosecutors’ and defense attorneys’ closing speeches. Human Communication Research 22 371-398.
32. Schmid, J., and Fiedler, K. (1998).The backbone of closing speeches: The impact of prosecution versus defense language on judicial attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 1140-1172.
33. Schnake, S. B., and Ruscher, J. B. (1998).Modern racism as a predictor of the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17 484-491.
34. Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 26 (pp. 123-162). San Diego: Academic Press.
35. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, methods, and the logic of conversation (pp. 1-31). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
36. Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. (1988).The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 558-568.
37. Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. (1989).Relocating attributional phenomena within the language-cognition interface: The case of actor-observer perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology 19 491-508.
38. Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. (1991).The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. European Review of Social Psychology 2 1-30.
39. Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. (1992).The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs.In G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition 58-78 Newbury Park: Sage
40. Semin, G. R., Gil de Montes, L., and Valencia J. F. (2003).Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 142-148.
41. Stangor, C., and McMillan, D. (1992).Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancyincongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin 111 42-61.
42. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Whetherell, M. S. (1987).Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43. von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., and Vargas, P. (1997).The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 490-509.
44. Wigboldus, D. H. J., Semin, G. R., and Spears, R. (2000).How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 5-18.
45. Wigboldus, D. H. J., Spears, R., and Semin, G. R. (2005).When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 8 215-230.