Coronary MR Angiography Revealed. How to Optimize Image Quality.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 117-125

  Ishida, Masaki ^a   Sakuma, Hajime ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cardiac gating; Coronary artery disease; Coronary magnetic resonance angiography; Gadolinium contrast medium; Magnetic resonance imaging; Respiratory gating

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY; HEART CYCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETISM; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RESPIRATORY GATED IMAGING; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ARTIFACT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ARTIFACTS; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RESPIRATORY-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84919491401     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: 15579786     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2014.09.008     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Go A.S., Mozaffarian D., Roger V.L., et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014, 129:399-410.
2. Dewey M. Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT-the role of CT angiography. Radiology 2011, 258:329-339.
3. Kato S., Kitagawa K., Ishida N., et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. JAm Coll Cardiol 2010, 56:983-991.
4. Sakuma H., Ichikawa Y., Suzawa N., et al. Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. Radiology 2005, 237:316-321.
5. Jahnke C., Paetsch I., Nehrke K., et al. Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:2313-2319.
6. Sakuma H., Ichikawa Y., Chino S., et al. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1946-1950.
7. Nagata M., Kato S., Kitagawa K., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T unenhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: initial single-center experience. Radiology 2011, 259:384-392.
8. Klein C., Gebker R., Kokocinski T., et al. Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2008, 10:45.
9. Heer T., Reiter S., Höfling B., et al. Diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography in combination with adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2013, 166:999-1009.
10. McConnell M.V., Khasgiwala V.C., Savord B.J., et al. Comparison of respiratory suppression methods and navigator locations for MR coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1997, 168:1369-1375.
11. Li D., Kaushikkar S., Haacke E.M., et al. Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with retrospective respiratory gating. Radiology 1996, 201:857-863.
12. Post J.C., van Rossum A.C., Hofman M.B., et al. Three-dimensional respiratory-gated MR angiography of coronary arteries: comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1996, 166:1399-1404.
13. Woodard P.K., Li D., Haacke E.M., et al. Detection of coronary stenoses on source and projection images using three-dimensional MR angiography with retrospective respiratory gating: preliminary experience. Am J Roentgenol 1998, 170:883-888.
14. Ishida M., Schuster A., Takase S., et al. Impact of an abdominal belt on breathing patterns and scan efficiency in whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison between the UK and Japan. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2011, 13:71.
15. Kim W.Y., Stuber M., Kissinger K.V., et al. Impact of bulk cardiac motion on right coronary MR angiography and vessel wall imaging. JMagn Reson Imaging 2001, 14:383-390.
16. Plein S., Jones T.R., Ridgway J.P., et al. Three-dimensional coronary MR angiography performed with subject-specific cardiac acquisition windows and motion-adapted respiratory gating. Am J Roentgenol 2003, 180:505-512.
17. Carr J.C., Simonetti O., Bundy J., et al. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001, 219:828-834.
18. McCarthy R.M., Shea S.M., Deshpande V.S., et al. Coronary MR angiography: true FISP imaging improved by prolonging breath holds with preoxygenation in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2003, 227:283-288.
19. Stuber M., Botnar R.M., Fischer S.E., et al. Preliminary report on invivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans. Magn Reson Med 2002, 48:425-429.
20. Sommer T., Hackenbroch M., Hofer U., et al. Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Radiology 2005, 234:718-725.
21. Kaul M.G., Stork A., Bansmann P.M., et al. Evaluation of balanced steady-state free precession (TrueFISP) and K-space segmented gradient echo sequences for 3D coronary MR angiography with navigator gating at 3 Tesla. Rofo 2004, 176:1560-1565.
22. Manning W.J., Li W., Edelman R.R. Apreliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. NEngl J Med 1993, 328:828-832.
23. Li D., Paschal C.B., Haacke E.M., et al. Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with fat saturation and magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 1993, 187:401-406.
24. Botnar R.M., Stuber M., Danias P.G., et al. Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA. Circulation 1999, 99:3139-3148.
25. Regenfus M., Ropers D., Achenbach S., et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2000, 36:44-50.
26. Tang L., Merkle N., Schär M., et al. Volume-targeted and whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography using an intravascular contrast agent. JMagn Reson Imaging 2009, 30:1191-1196.
27. Yang Q., Li K., Liu X., et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. JAm Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:69-76.
28. Laurent S., Elst L.V., Muller R.N. Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2006, 1:128-137.
29. Krombach G.A., Hahnen C., Lodemann K.P., et al. Gd-BOPTA for assessment of myocardial viability on MRI: changes of T1 value and their impact on delayed enhancement. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:2136-2146.
30. Stuber M., Botnar R.M., Danias P.G., et al. Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. Radiology 1999, 212:579-587.
31. Piccini D., Littmann A., Nielles-Vallespin S., et al. Respiratory self-navigation for whole-heart bright-blood coronary MRI: methods for robust isolation and automatic segmentation of the blood pool. Magn Reson Med 2012, 68:571-579.
32. Henningsson M., Koken P., Stehning C., et al. Whole-heart coronary MR angiography with 2D self-navigated image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2012, 67:437-445.
33. Akçakaya M., Rayatzadeh H., Basha T.A., et al. Accelerated late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR imaging with isotropic spatial resolution using compressed sensing: initial experience. Radiology 2012, 264:691-699.
34. Akçakaya M., Basha T.A., Chan R.H., et al. Accelerated isotropic sub-millimeter whole-heart coronary MRI: compressed sensing versus parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2014, 71:815-822.