FragFlow automated fragment detection in scientific workflows

Proceedings - 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on eScience, eScience 2014

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 281-289

  Garijo, Daniel ^a   Corcho, Oscar ^a   Gil, Yolanda ^b   Gutman, Boris A ^c   Dinov, Ivo D ^c   Thompson, Paul ^c   Toga, Arthur W ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

LONI pipeline; scientific workflow; workflow fragment; workflow reuse

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; GRAPH ALGORITHMS; PIPELINES;

AUTOMATED WORKFLOW; COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENT; FRAGMENT DETECTION; GRAPH MINING; PIPE-LINE SYSTEMS; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW FRAGMENT; WORKFLOW REUSE;

E-SCIENCE;

EID: 84919485254     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2014.32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. W. M. P. van der Aalst, H. T. de Beer and B. F. van Dongen. Process mining and verification of properties: An approach based on temporall logic. Proceedings of the 2005 Confederated international conference on On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. P 130-147. 2005
2. R. Bergmann and Y. Gil. Similarity assessment and efficient retrieval of semantic workflows. Information Systems Journal, v40 p115-127. 2014
3. D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder. Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artifcial Intelligence Research, 1:231-255, 1994.
4. C. Diamantini, D. Potena and E. Storti. Mining usage patterns from a repository of scientific workflows. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 152-157. 2012.
5. D. Garijo, O. Corcho and Y. Gil. Detecting common scientific workflows using templates and executing provenance. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Knowledge capture (K-CAP), 33-40. 2013.
6. D. Garijo, P. Alper, K. Belhajjame, O. Corcho, et al. Common motifs in scientific workflows: An empirical analysis, Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 36, Pages 338-351. July 2014.
7. D. Garijo and Y. Gil Augmenting PROV with Plans in P-PLAN: Scientific Processes as Linked Data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Science 2012, Boston, 2012.
8. B. Giardine et al. Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Research, 15(10):1451-1455, Oct 2005.
9. Y. Gil, V. Ratnakar, J. Kim, P. A. González-Calero, et al. Wings: Intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(1):62-72, 2011.
10. A. Goderis, P. Fisher, A. Gibson, F. Tanoh, et al. Benchmarking Workflow Discovery: A Case Study From Bioinformatics. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 00:1-7. 2000.
11. A. Goderis, P. Li, and C. A. Goble. Workflow discovery: The problem, a case study from e-science and a graph-based solution. In ICWS, pages 312-319, 2006.
12. C. Jiang, F. Coenen and M Zito. A Survey of Frequent Subgraph Mining Algorithms. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 28:1, 75-105, 2012.
13. M. Kuramochi and G. Karypis. An Efficient Algorithm for Discovering Frequent Subgraphs IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16(9): 1038-1051, 2004.
14. D. Leake and J. Kendall-Morwick. Towards case-based support for escience workflow generation by mining provenance. In Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, ECCBR '08, pages 269-283, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
15. P. Missier, S. Soiland-Reyes, S. Owen, W. Tan, et al. Taverna, reloaded. In 22nd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
16. M. Mongiov?, R. D Natale, R. Giugno, A. Pulvirenti and A. Ferro, R. Sharan. SIGMA: A set-cover-based inexact graph matching algorithm. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology; 8(2):199-218. 2010.
17. S. Nijssen and J. N. Kok. A Quickstart in Frequent Structure Mining can Make a Difference, In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 647-652. 2004
18. J. Stoyanovich, B. Taskar and S. Davidson. Exploring repositories of scientific workflows. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Workflow Approaches to New Data-centric Science (Wands '10). ACM, New York, USA, Article 7. 2010.
19. A. Rozinat and W. M. P. van der Aalst. Decision Mining in ProM. Business Process Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 4102, pp 420-425. 2006.
20. J. Starlinger, S. Cohen-Boulakia and U. Leser. (Re)Use in public scientific workflow repositories. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM'12), p361-378. 2012.
21. F. Torri, A. P. Clark, I. D. Dinov, A. Zamanyan, et al. Next generation sequence analysis and computational genomics using graphical pipeline workflows. Genes, 3:545-575. 2012.
22. Yan, X. And Han, J. W. gSpan: Graph-based Substructure pattern mining, In Proceedings of International Conference on Data Mining, 721-724. 2002.