Detecting common scientific workflow fragments using templates and execution provenance

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge Capture: "Knowledge Capture in the Age of Massive Web Data", K-CAP 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Garijo, Daniel ^a   Corcho, Oscar ^a   Gil, Yolanda ^b  

^a Facultad de Informatica   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstraction; Provenance; Scientific workflow; Wings

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION; LEVEL OF DETAIL; PROVENANCE; SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORK-FLOW SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW EXECUTION; WORKFLOW TEMPLATES;

EXPERIMENTS; WINGS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 84883101714     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2479832.2479848     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. R. Bergmann and Y. Gil. Similarity assessment and efficient retrieval of semantic workflows. To appear in the Information Systems Journal, 2012.
2. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3): 1-22, 2009.
3. S. C. Boulakia, C. Froidevaux, and J. Chen. Scientific workflow rewriting while preserving provenance. In 8th IEEE International Conference on eScience 2012, pages 1-9, Chicago, 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA.
4. M. H. Burstein, R. Laddaga, D. D. McDonald, M. T. Cox, B. Benyo, P. Robertson, T. S. Hussain, M. Brinn, and D. V. McDermott. Poirot - integrated learning of web service procedures. In AAAI, pages 1274-1279, 2008.
5. S. P. Callahan, J. Freire, E. Santos, C. E. Scheidegger, C. T. Silva, and H. T. Vo. Vistrails: Visualization meets data management. In ACM SIGMOD, pages 745-747. ACM Press, 2006.
6. D. J. Cook and L. B. Holder. Substructure discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1: 231-255, 1994.
7. S. A. Cook. The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In Proceedings of the third annual A CM symposium on Theory of computing, STOC '71, pages 151-158, New York, NY, USA, 1971. ACM.
8. D. Garijo, P. Alper, K. Belhajjame, O. Corcho, Y. Gil, and C. Goble. Common motifs in scientific workflows: An empirical analysis. In 8th IEEE International Conference on eScience 2012, Chicago, 2012. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA.
9. D. Garijo and Y. Gil. A new approach for publishing workflows: Abstractions, standards, and linked data. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Workflows in support of large-scale science, pages 47-56, Seattle, 2011. ACM.
10. B. Giardine et al. Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Research, 15(10): 1451-1455, Oct 2005.
11. Y. Gil, V. Ratnakar, J. Kim, P. A. Gonzâlez-Calero, P. T. Groth, J. Moody, and E. Deelman. Wings: Intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(1): 62-72, 2011.
12. A. Goderis, P. Li, and C. A. Goble. Workflow discovery: the problem, study from e-science and a graph-based solution. In ICWS, pages 312-319, 2006.
13. A. Goderis, U. Sattler, P. W. Lord, and C. A. Goble. Seven bottlenecks to workflow reuse and repurposing. In International Semantic Web Conference, pages 323-337. Springer, 2005.
14. J. M. Gómez-Pérez and O. Corcho. Problem-solving methods for understanding process executions. Computing in Science and Engineering, 10(3): 47-52, May 2008.
15. M. Hauder, Y. Gil, and Y. Liu. A framework for efficient data analytics through automatic configuration and customization of scientific workflows. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience, ESCIENCE '11, pages 379-386, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society.
16. L. B. Holder, D. J. Cook, and S. Djoko. Substructure Discovery in the SUBDUE System. AAAI Workshop on Knowledge Discovery, pages 169-180, 1994.
17. D. Leake and J. Kendall-Morwick. Towards case-based support for e-science workflow generation by mining provenance. In Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, ECCBR '08, pages 269-283, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
18. B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, E. A. Lee, J. Tao, and Y. Zhao. Scientific workflow management and the kepler system. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(10): 1039-1065, 2006.
19. P. Mates, E. Santos, J. Freire, and C. T. Silva. Crowdlabs: Social analysis and visualization for the sciences. In 23rd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), pages 555-564. Springer, 2011.
20. P. Missier, S. Soiland-Reyes, S. Owen, W. Tan, A. Nenadic, I. Dunlop, A. Williams, T. Oinn, and C. Goble. Taverna, reloaded. In 22nd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM), Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
21. L. Moreau, B. Clifford, J. Freire, J. Futrelle, Y. Gil, P. Groth, N. Kwasnikowska, S. Miles, P. Missier, J. Myers, B. Plaie, Y. Simmhan, E. Stephan, and J. Van den Bussche. The Open Provenance Model core specification (v1.1). Future Generation Computer Systems, July 2010.
22. A. G. Perez and R. Benjamins. Applications of ontologies and problem-solving methods. AI Magazine, 20(1), 1999.
23. M. Reich, T. Liefeld, J. Gould, J. Lerner, P. Tamayo, and J. P. Mesirov. Genepattern 2.0. Nature Genetics, 38: 500-501, 2006.
24. D. D. Roure, C. A. Goble, and R. Stevens. The design and realisation of the myExperiment virtual research environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Comp. Syst., 25(5): 561-567, 2009.
25. W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1): 5-51, 2003.
26. F. Yaman, T. Oates, and M. Burstein. A context driven approach for workflow mining. In Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence, IJCAI09, pages 1798-1803, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.