Touch is a team effort: Interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 689-697

  Saal, Hannes P ^a   Bensmaia, Sliman J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Neural coding; Perception; Somatosensory

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BRAIN CELL; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONHUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PACINI CORPUSCLE; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; REVIEW; SKIN SENSITIVITY; SKIN SURFACE; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VIBRATION; BRAIN MAPPING; MECHANORECEPTOR; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY NERVE; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

AFFERENT PATHWAYS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; MECHANORECEPTORS; NEURONS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TOUCH;

EID: 84919483688     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.012     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Johnson K.O. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:455-461.
2. Johnson K.O., et al. Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 17:539-558.
3. Johnson K.O., Hsiao S.S. Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1992, 15:227-250.
4. Bolanowski S.J., et al. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 84:1680-1694.
5. Ochoa J., Torebjork E. Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. J. Physiol. 1983, 342:633-654.
6. Torebjork H.E., et al. Intraneural microstimulation in man. Its relation to specificity of tactile sensations. Brain 1987, 110:1509-1529.
7. Abraira V.E., Ginty D.D. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 2013, 79:618-639.
8. Kayser C., et al. Integration of touch and sound in auditory cortex. Neuron 2005, 48:373-384.
9. Pare M., et al. Paucity of presumptive ruffini corpuscles in the index finger pad of humans. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 456:260-266.
10. Pare M., et al. Distribution and terminal arborizations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous finger pads of the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002, 445:347-359.
11. Poulos D.A., et al. The neural signal for the intensity of a tactile stimulus. J. Neurosci. 1984, 4:2016-2024.
12. Vega-Bermudez F., Johnson K.O. SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:2701-2710.
13. Goodwin A.W., Wheat H.E. Effects of nonuniform fiber sensitivity, innervation geometry, and noise on information relayed by a population of slowly adapting type I primary afferents from the fingerpad. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19:8057-8070.
14. Muniak M.A., et al. The neural coding of stimulus intensity: linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11687-11699.
15. Bensmaia S.J. Tactile intensity and population codes. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 190:165-173.
16. Johnson K.O., Lamb G.D. Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J. Physiol. 1981, 310:117-144.
17. Phillips J.R., Johnson K.O. Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 1981, 46:1192-1203.
18. Goodwin A.W., et al. Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:798-810.
19. Goodwin A.W., et al. Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 78:2881-2888.
20. Phillips J.R., et al. Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85:1317-1321.
21. Johansson R.S., Vallbo A.B. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. 1979, 286:283-300.
22. Darian-Smith I., Kenins P. Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. J. Physiol. 1980, 309:147-155.
23. Craig J.C. Modes of vibrotactile pattern generation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1980, 6:151-166.
24. Bliss J.C., et al. Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind. IEEE Trans. Man-Mach. Sys. 1970, 11:58-65.
25. Gardner E.P., Palmer C.I. Simulation of motion on the skin. I. Receptive fields and temporal frequency coding by cutaneous mechanoreceptors of OPTACON pulses delivered to the hand. J. Neurophysiol. 1989, 62:1410-1436.
26. Bensmaia S.J., et al. SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:1771-1782.
27. Vallbo A.B., Johansson R.S. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum. Neurobiol. 1984, 3:3-14.
28. Westling G., Johansson R.S. Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 1987, 66:128-140.
29. Phillips J.R., et al. Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12:827-839.
30. Whitsel B.L., et al. Cortical information processing of stimulus motion on primate skin. J. Neurophysiol. 1972, 35:691-717.
31. Warren S., et al. Objective classification of motion- and direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1986, 56:598-622.
32. Pei Y.C., et al. Shape invariant coding of motion direction in somatosensory cortex. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000305.
33. Pei Y.C., et al. Neural mechanisms of tactile motion integration in somatosensory cortex. Neuron 2011, 69:536-547.
34. Depeault A., et al. Neuronal correlates of tactile speed in primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110:1554-1566.
35. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp. Brain Res. 1984, 56:550-564.
36. Jenmalm P., et al. Influence of object shape on responses of human tactile afferents under conditions characteristic of manipulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18:164-176.
37. Birznieks I., et al. Encoding of direction of fingertip forces by human tactile afferents. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:8222-8237.
38. Birznieks I., et al. Encoding of tangential torque in responses of tactile afferent fibres innervating the fingerpad of the monkey. J. Physiol. 2010, 588:1057-1072.
39. Johansson R.S., Birznieks I. First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:170-177.
40. Saal H.P., et al. Information about complex fingertip parameters in individual human tactile afferent neurons. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:8022-8031.
41. Birznieks I., et al. Slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the borders of the human fingernail encode fingertip forces. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:9370-9379.
42. Srinivasan M.A., et al. Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. J. Neurophysiol. 1990, 63:1323-1332.
43. Johansson R.S., Flanagan J.R. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:345-359.
44. Skedung L., et al. Feeling small: exploring the tactile perception limits. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:2617.
45. Weber A.I., et al. Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:17107-17112.
46. Connor C.E., Johnson K.O. Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12:3414-3426.
47. Connor C.E., et al. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J. Neurosci. 1990, 10:3823-3836.
48. Sripati A.P., et al. A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:3852-3864.
49. Hollins M., Risner S.R. Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62:695-705.
50. Manfredi L.R., et al. Natural scenes in tactile texture. J. Neurophysiol. 2014, 111:1792-1802.
51. Sur M., et al. Modular segregation of functional cell classes within the postcentral somatosensory cortex of monkeys. Science 1981, 212:1059-1061.
52. Sur M., et al. Modular distribution of neurons with slowly adapting and rapidly adapting responses in area 3b of somatosensory cortex in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1984, 51:724-744.
53. Mountcastle V.B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1957, 20:408-434.
54. Mountcastle V.B., Powell T.P. Central nervous mechanisms subserving position sense and kinesthesis. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959, 105:173-200.
55. Dykes R.W., et al. Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 1980, 43:1527-1546.
56. Chen L.M., et al. Fine-scale organization of SI (area 3b) in the squirrel monkey revealed with intrinsic optical imaging. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 86:3011-3029.
57. Friedman R.M., et al. Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:12724-12729.
58. Romo R., et al. Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation. Nature 1998, 392:387-390.
59. Romo R., et al. Sensing without touching: psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation. Neuron 2000, 26:273-278.
60. Pei Y.C., et al. Convergence of submodality-specific input onto neurons in primary somatosensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:1843-1853.
61. Hyvarinen J., Poranen A. Receptive field integration and submodality convergence in the hand area of the post-central gyrus of the alert monkey. J. Physiol. 1978, 283:539-556.
62. Lebedev M.A., Nelson R.J. High-frequency vibratory sensitive neurons in monkey primary somatosensory cortex: entrained and nonentrained responses to vibration during the performance of vibratory-cued hand movements. Exp. Brain Res. 1996, 111:313-325.
63. Mountcastle V.B., et al. Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1990, 10:3032-3044.
64. Burton H., Sinclair R.J. Second somatosensory cortical area in macaque monkeys: 2. Neuronal responses to punctate vibrotactile stimulation of glabrous skin on the hand. Brain Res. 1991, 538:127-135.
65. Harvey M.A., et al. Multiplexing stimulus information through rate and temporal codes in primate somatosensory cortex. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001558.
66. Tommerdahl M., et al. Responses of contralateral SI and SII in cat to same-site cutaneous flutter versus vibration. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 82:1982-1992.
67. Tommerdahl M., et al. Effects of high-frequency skin stimulation on SI cortex: mechanisms and functional implications. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 2005, 22:151-169.
68. Wang X., et al. Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli. Nature 2005, 435:341-346.
69. Bensmaia S.J., et al. The representation of stimulus orientation in the early stages of somatosensory processing. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:776-786.
70. Salimi I., et al. Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. II. Responses to object texture and weights. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:835-844.
71. Tommerdahl M., et al. Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 2002, 135:83-91.
72. Bensmaia S.J., et al. Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:1783-1791.
73. Vierck C.J., Jones M.B. Influences of low and high frequency oscillation upon spatio-tactile resolution. Physiol. Behav. 1970, 5:1431-1435.
74. Johnson K.O. Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 1974, 37:48-72.
75. Tommerdahl M., et al. Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:160-170.
76. Mackevicius E.L., et al. Millisecond precision spike timing shapes tactile perception. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:15309-15317.
77. Gibson J.J. Observations on active touch. Psychol. Rev. 1962, 69:477-491.
78. Lederman S.J., Klatzky R.L. Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 1993, 84:29-40.
79. Overvliet K.E., et al. The use of proprioception and tactile information in haptic search. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2008, 129:83-90.
80. Robles-De-La-Torre G., Hayward V. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature 2001, 412:445-448.
81. Bensmaia S.J., et al. Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:3023-3036.
82. Leung Y.Y., et al. Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:3037-3045.
83. Hollins M., et al. Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 2001, 18:253-262.
84. Tannan V., et al. Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli. Brain Res. 2007, 1186:164-170.
85. Freeman A.W., Johnson K.O. A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey. J. Physiol. 1982, 323:43-64.
86. DiCarlo J.J., Johnson K.O. Receptive field structure in cortical area 3b of the alert monkey. Behav. Brain Res. 2002, 135:167-178.
87. Ekedahl R., et al. Peripheral afferents with common function cluster in the median nerve and somatotopically innervate the human palm. Brain Res. Bull. 1997, 42:367-376.
88. Wu G., et al. Clustering of Pacinian corpuscle afferent fibres in the human median nerve. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 126:399-409.
89. Dykes R.W., et al. Submodality segregation and receptive-field sequences in cuneate, gracile, and external cuneate nuclei of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 1982, 47:389-416.
90. Sakurai K., et al. The organization of submodality-specific touch afferent inputs in the vibrissa column. Cell Rep. 2013, 5:87-98.
91. Dykes R.W., et al. Regional segregation of neurons responding to quickly adapting, slowly adapting, deep and Pacinian receptors within thalamic ventroposterior lateral and ventroposterior inferior nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Neuroscience 1981, 6:1687-1692.
92. Kaas J.H., et al. The somatotopic organization of the ventroposterior thalamus of the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. J. Comp. Neurol. 1984, 226:111-140.
93. Weiss N., et al. The human thalamic somatic sensory nucleus [ventral caudal (Vc)] shows neuronal mechanoreceptor-like responses to optimal stimuli for peripheral mechanoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:1033-1042.
94. Goodwin A.W., Wheat H.E. Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:53-77.
95. Phillips J.R., et al. Representation of braille characters in human nerve fibres. Exp. Brain Res. 1990, 81:589-592.
96. Ahissar E., et al. Transformation from temporal to rate coding in a somatosensory thalamocortical pathway. Nature 2000, 406:302-306.
97. Vazquez Y., et al. Transformation of the neural code for tactile detection from thalamus to cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E2635-E2644.
98. Nicolelis M.A., et al. Simultaneous encoding of tactile information by three primate cortical areas. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:621-630.
99. Gardner E.P., Costanzo R.M. Properties of kinesthetic neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. Brain Res. 1981, 214:301-319.
100. Prud'homme M.J., Kalaska J.F. Proprioceptive activity in primate primary somatosensory cortex during active arm reaching movements. J. Neurophysiol. 1994, 72:2280-2301.
101. Tillery S.I., et al. Somatosensory cortical activity in relation to arm posture: nonuniform spatial tuning. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 76:2423-2438.
102. Fitzgerald P.J., et al. Receptive field properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: evidence for multiple functional representations. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:11193-11204.
103. Graziano M.S.A., Botvinick M.M. How the brain represents the body: insights from neurophysiology and psychology. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance 2002, 136-157. Oxford University Press. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
104. Salimi I., et al. Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. I. Receptive fields and discharge patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:825-834.
105. Gardner E.P., et al. Neurophysiology of prehension. II. Response diversity in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortices. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:1656-1670.
106. Gerling G.J., et al. Validating a population model of tactile mechanotransduction of slowly adapting type I afferents at levels of skin mechanics, single-unit response and psychophysics. IEEE Trans. Haptics 2014, 7:216-228.