Congenital heart disease and adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses with confirmed isolated single functioning umbilical artery

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 85-87

  Araujo Junior E ^b   Palma Dias, R ^a   Martins, W P ^c   Reidy, K ^a   Da Silva Costa, F ^a  

^a ROYAL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Congenital heart disease; Fetal growth restriction; Preterm delivery; Single umbilical artery

Indexed keywords

ABSENT DUCTUS VENOSUS; ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AORTA COARCTATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOMEGALY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FALLOT TETRALOGY; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS BLADDER; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPOPLASTIC LEFT HEART SYNDROME; HYPOPLASTIC RIGHT HEART SYNDROME; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LEFT ISOMERISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PULMONARY VALVE ATRESIA; PULMONARY VALVE STENOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RIGHT ISOMERISM; SINGLE UMBILICAL ARTERY; UMBILICAL ARTERY; UMBILICAL CORD; ABNORMALITIES; ADOLESCENT; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; VICTORIA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; UMBILICAL ARTERIES; VICTORIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919430727     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: 13646893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.935720     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. 1996. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstetrics and Gynecology 87: 163-168.
2. Burshtein S, Levy A, Holcberg G, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E 2011 Is Single Umbilical Artery An Independent Risk Factor for Perinatal Mortality? Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 283: 191-194.
3. Catanzarite VA, Hendricks SK, Maida C, Westbrook C, Cousins L, Schrimmer D. 1995. Prenatal diagnosis of the two-vessel cord: implications for patient counselling and obstetric management. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 5: 98-105.
4. DeFigueiredo D, Dagklis T, Zidere V, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. 2010. Isolated single umbilical artery: need for specialist fetal echocardiography? Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 36: 553-555.
5. Department of Health, Victoria, Australia. 2014. Consultative Council on Obstetrics and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity. Available at: www.health. vic.gov.au/ccopmm/statistics/births-vic.htm (Accessed 15 January 2014).
6. Eckmann-Scholz C, Hoff mann U, Kramer HH, Schollmeyer T, Schem C, Jonat W et al. 2012. Perinatal management of pregnancies with severe fetal heart defects and epigenetic aspects. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 25 : 2542-2545.
7. Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, Schwinger E, Gembruch U. 2000. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler fi ndings and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 15: 114-117.
8. Gossett DR, Lantz ME, Chisholm CA. 2002. Antenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: is fetal echocardiography warranted? Obstetrics and Gynecology 100: 903-908.
9. Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Crane JP, Cahill AG. 2010. Single umbilical artery and its associated fi ndings. Obstetrics and Gynecology 115: 930-934.
10. Khoo NS, Van Essen P, Richardson M, Robertson T. 2008. Eff ectiveness of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects in South Australia: a population analysis 1999 -2003. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 48: 559-563.
11. Lee W, Allan L, Carvalho JS, Chaoui R, Copel J, Devore G et al. 2008. ISUOG consensus statement: what constitutes a fetal echocardiogram? Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 32: 239-242.
12. Li M, Wang W, Yang X, Yan Y, Wu Q. 2008. Evaluation of referral indications for fetal echocardiography in Beijing. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 27 : 1291-1296.
13. Martínez-Frías ML, Bermejo E, Rodríguez-Pinilla E, Prieto D ; ECEMC Working Group. 2008. Does single umbilical artery (SUA) predict any type of congenital defect? Clinical-epidemiological analysis of a large consecutive series of malformed infants. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 146A: 15-25.
14. Martínez-Payo C, Gaitero A, Tamarit I, García-Espantaleón M, Iglesias Goy E. 2005. Perinatal results following the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of single umbilical artery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 34 : 1068-1074.
15. Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, Van den Hof M. 2010. Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology 116: 843-850.
16. Predanic M, Perni SC, Friedman A, Chervenak FA, Chasen ST. 2005. Fetal growth assessment and neonatal birth weight in fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 105: 1093-1097.
17. Prefumo F, Güven MA, Carvalho JS. 2010. Single umbilical artery and congenital heart disease in selected and unselected populations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 35: 552-555.
18. Rembouskos G, Cicero S, Longo D, Sacchini C, Nicolaides KH. 2003. Single umbilical artery at 11 -14 weeksgestation: relation to chromosomal defects. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 22: 567-570.
19. Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K, Snijders RJ, Bilardo CM, Mol BW, et al. 2013. Relationship of isolated umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and metaanalysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 42: 622-628.
20. Wallenstein MB, Harper LM, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Longman RE, Macones GA, et al. 2012. Fetal congenital heart disease and intrauterine growth restriction: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 25 : 662-665.