Single umbilical artery and its associated findings

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 115, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 930-934

  Hua, Meiling ^a   Odibo, Anthony O ^a   MacOnes, George A ^a   Roehl, Kimberly A ^a   Crane, James P ^a   Cahill, Alison G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; KIDNEY MALFORMATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; SINGLE UMBILICAL ARTERY; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

ADULT; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; UMBILICAL ARTERIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951603562     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da50ed     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Parilla BV, Tamura RK, MacGregor SN, Beibel LJ, Sabbagha RE. The clinical significance of a single umbilical artery as an isolated finding on prenatal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85:570-572
2. Doornebal N, de Vries TW, Bos AF, de Vries NK. Screening infants with an isolated single umbilical artery for renal anomalies: nonsense? Early Hum Dev 2007;83:567-570
3. Callen PW. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 2000.
4. Budorick NE, Kelly TF, Dunn JA, Scioscia AL. The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered? J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:619-27; quiz 628.
5. Leung AK, Robson WL. Single umbilical artery: a report of 159 cases. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:108-110
6. Catanzarite VA, Hendricks SK, Maida C, Westbrook C, Cousins L, Schrimmer D. Prenatal diagnosis of the two-vessel cord: implications for patient counselling and obstetric management. Ultarasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:98-105.
7. Wiegand S, McKenna DS, Croom C, Ventolini G, Sonek JD, Neiger R. Serial sonographic growth assessment in pregnancies complicated by an isolated single umbilical artery. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:149-152
8. Thummala MR, Raju T, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:580-585
9. Bombrys AE, Neiger R, Hawkins S, Sonek J, Croom C, McKenna D, et al. Pregnancy outcome in isolated single umbilical artery. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:239-242
10. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr 1967;71:159-163
11. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression, 2000. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
12. Predanic M, Perni SC, Friedman A, Chervenak FA, Chase ST. Fetal growth assessment and neonatal birth weight in fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:1093-1097
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intra-uterine growth restriction. ACOG Practice Bulletin 12. Washington, DC: ACOG 2000.
14. Jones TB, Sorokin Y, Bhatia R, Zador IE, Bottoms SF. Single umbilical artery: accurate diagnosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:538-540