Community-based endogamy as an influence indicator

Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 67-76

  Silva, Thiago H P ^a   Moro, Mirella M ^a   Silva, Ana Paula C ^a   Meira, Wagner ^a   Laender, Alberto H F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bibliometric indicators; Research performance

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; COMMUNITY-BASED; GROUND TRUTH; RANDOM SAMPLING; REAL DATA SETS; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 84919394959     PISSN: 15525996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970152     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. J. Bollen et al. A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures. CoRR, abs/0902. 2183, 2009.
2. K. Borner et al. Studying the Emerging Global Brain: Analyzing and Visualizing the Impact of Co-Authorship Teams. Complexity, 10(4):57-67, 2005.
3. R. S. Burt. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2):349-399, 2004.
4. H. Deng et al. Modeling and Exploiting Heterogeneous Bibliographic Networks for Expertise Ranking. In JCDL, pages 71-80, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
5. M. S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties. Amer-ican Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380, 1973.
6. R. Guimerá et al. Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performanced. Science, pages 697-702, 2005.
7. B. H. Hall, A. B. Jaé, and M. Trajtenberg. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. Technical Report NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
8. B. H. Hall, A. B. Jaé, and M. Trajtenberg. Market Value and Patent Citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1):16-38, 2005.
9. M. Kato and A. Ando. The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3):535-553, 2013.
10. M. Kendall. A New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika, 1938.
11. A. H. F. Laender et al. Building a Research Social Network from an Individual Perspective. In JCDL, Ottawa, Canada, 2011.
12. H. Lima et al. Aggregating Productivity Indices for Ranking Researchers Across Multiple Areas. In JCDL, pages 97-106, Indianapolis, USA, 2013.
13. G. R. Lopes et al. Ranking Strategy for Graduate Programs Evaluation. In ICITA, pages 253-260, Sydney, Australia, 2011.
14. G. R. Lopes et al. Scientific Collaboration in Research Networks: A Quantification Method by Using Gini Coe ficient. IJCSA, 9(2):15-31, 2012.
15. S. L. Montolio, D. Dominguez-Sal, and J. L. Larriba-Pey. Research Endogamy as an Indicator of Conference Quality. SIGMOD Rec., 42(1):11-16, July 2013.
16. M. E. Newman. Who Is the Best Connected Scientist?A Study of Scientific Coauthorship Networks. In Com-plex Networks, volume 650 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pages 337-370. Springer, 2004.
17. M. E. J. Newman. Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1):5200-5205, 2004.
18. L. Soulier et al. BibRank: A Language-based Model for Co-ranking Entities in Bibliographic Networks. In JCDL, pages 61-70, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
19. R. Yan et al. To Better Stand on the Shoulder of Giants. In JCDL, pages 51-60, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.