Hybridizing two-stage meta-heuristic optimization model with weighted least squares support vector machine for optimal shape of double-arch dams

Applied Soft Computing Journal

Volumn 27, Issue , 2015, Pages 205-218

  Saber Mahani, Amir ^a   Shojaee, Saeed ^a   Salajegheh, Eysa ^a   Khatibinia, Mohsen ^b  

^a SHAHID BAHONAR UNIVERSITY OF KERMAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRJAND   (Iran)

Author keywords

Continuous ant colony optimization; Double arch concrete dams; Optimal shape; Particle swarm optimization; Weighted least squares support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION; ARCH DAMS; ARCHES; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CONCRETE DAMS; CONCRETES; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

BENCHMARK FUNCTIONS; FASTER CONVERGENCE; META-HEURISTIC OPTIMIZATIONS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; OPTIMAL SHAPE; RELIABLE METHODS; SECOND PHASE; WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES;

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

EID: 84919343872     PISSN: 15684946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. J. Akbari, M.T. Ahmadi, and H. Moharrami Advances in concrete arch dams shape optimization Appl. Math. Model. 35 2011 3316 3333
2. K.J. William, and E.D. Warnke Constitutive model for the triaxial behaviour of concrete Proceedings of International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, ISMES Bergamo 1975 1 30
3. R.E. Ricketts, and O.C. Zienkiewicz Shape Optimization of Concrete Dams, Criteria and Assumptions for Numerical Analysis of Dams 1975 Quadrant Press Swansea, London, United Kingdom 1179 1206
4. K. Wasserman Three dimensional shape optimization of arch dams with prescribed shape function J. Struct. Mech. 11 1983 465 489
5. A.S. Rahim Optimum Shape of An Arch Dam for Static Loads (Mechanical Engineering Thesis) 1983 Asian Institute of Technology Bangkok
6. M.S. Samy, and M. Wieland Shape optimization of arch dams for static and dynamic loads Proceedings of International Workshop on Arch Dams Coimbra 1987
7. T.M. Yao, and K.K. Choi Shape optimal design of an arch dam J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 115 1989 2401 2405
8. A. Fanelli, M. Fanelli, and P. Salvaneschi A neural network approach to the definition of near optimal arch dam shape Dam. Eng. IV 1993 123 140
9. M. Maheri, and N.T. Bidokhti Shape optimization of concrete arch dams using simple genetic algorithm Dam. Eng. XIV 2001 105 140
10. J. Salajegheh, E. Salajegheh, S.M. Seyedpoor, and S. Gholizadeh Optimum design of arch dams including hydrodynamic effects for earthquake loading using the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation method B.H.V. Topping, M. Papadrakakis, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology 2008 Civil-Comp Press Stirlingshire, United Kingdom Paper 60
11. S.M. Seyedpoor, J. Salajegheh, E. Salajegheh, and S. Golizadeh Optimum shape design of arch dams for earthquake loading using a fuzzy inference system and wavelet neural networks Eng. Optim. 41 2009 473 493
12. S.M. Seyedpoor, J. Salajegheh, E. Salajegheh, and S. Gholizadeh Optimal design of arch dams subjected to earthquake loading by a combination of simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation and particle swarm algorithms Appl. Soft. Comput. 11 2011 39 48
13. J. Akbari, and M.T. Ahmadi Shape optimization of concrete arch dams for dynamic loading using mesh design velocity Dam. Eng. XX 2009 77 98
14. S.M. Seyedpoor, J. Salajegheh, and E. Salajegheh Shape optimal design of materially nonlinear arch dams including dam-water-foundation rock interaction using an improved PSO algorithm Optim. Eng. 13 2011 1 22
15. J. Kennedy, and R.C. Eberhart Swarm Intelligence 2002 Morgan Kaufman Publishers
16. Y. Shi, H. Liu, L. Gao, and G. Zhang Cellular particle swarm optimization Inform. Sci. 181 2011 4460 4493
17. T. Niknam An efficient hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on PSO and HBMO algorithms for multi-objective distribution feeder reconfiguration Energy Convers. Manage. 50 2009 2074 2082
18. T. Niknam, and E.A. Farsani A hybrid self-adaptive particle swarm optimization and modified shuffled frog leaping algorithm for distribution feeder reconfiguration Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 23 2010 1340 1349
19. H. Modares, A. Alfi, and M.B. Naghibi Sistani Parameter estimation of bilinear systems based on an adaptive particle swarm optimization Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 23 2010 1105 1111
20. X. Li, and X. Yao Cooperatively coevolving particle swarms for large scale optimization IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 16 2012 210 224
21. K. Socha, and M. Dorigo Ant colony optimization for continuous domains Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185 2008 1155 1173
22. J.A.K. Suykens, J.D. Brabanter, L. Lukas, and J. Vandewalle Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation Neurocomputing 105 2002 85 105
23. B. Zhu, B. Rao, J. Jia, and Y. Li Shape optimization of arch dam for static and dynamic loads J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 118 1992 2996 3015
24. A.K. Chopra Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering 3rd ed. 2006 Prentice Hall New Jersey
25. S. Kucukarslan Dynamic analysis of dam-reservoir foundation interaction in time domain J. Comput. Mech. 33 2004 274 281
26. S. Kucukarslan, B. Coskun, and V. Taskin Transient analysis of dam-reservoir interaction including the reservoir bottom effects J. Fluid. Struct. 20 2005 1073 1084
27. G. Fenves, and A.K. Chopra EAGD-84: a computer program for earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams, UCB/EERC-84/11 Report 1984 University of California Berkeley, USA
28. C.A. Coello Coello Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evaluation algorithms: a survey of the state of art Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 2002 1245 1287
29. S. Rajeev, and C.S. Krishnamoorthy Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithm J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 118 1992 1233 1250
30. E. Salajegheh, J. Salajegheh, S.M. Seyedpoor, and M. Khatibinia Optimal design of geometrically nonlinear space trusses using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system Sci. Iran. 6 2009 403 414
31. S. Shojaee, M. Arjomand, and M. Khatibinia Size and layout optimization of trusses using hybrid of an improved discrete particle swarm and method of moving asymptotes algorithms Inter. J. Optim. Civil Eng. 3 2013 57 83
32. Y. Shi, and R.C. Eberhart A modified particle swarm optimizer Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation 1998 IEEE Press
33. E. Salajegheh, S. Gholizadeh, and M. Khatibinia Optimal design of structures for earthquake loads by a hybrid RBF-BPSO method Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 7 2008 14 24
34. P. Moscato Memetic Algorithms: A Short introduction, New Ideas in Optimization 1999 McGraw-Hill
35. F. Neri, and C. Cotta Memetic algorithms and memetic computing optimization: a literature review Swarm Evol. Comput. 2 2012 1 14
36. M. Khatibinia, E. Salajegheh, J. Salajegheh, and M.J. Fadaee Reliability-based design optimization of RC structures including soil-structure interaction using a discrete gravitational search algorithm and a proposed metamodel Eng. Optim. 45 2013 1147 1165
37. M. Khatibinia, J. Salajegheh, M.J. Fadaee, and E. Salajegheh Seismic reliability assessment of RC structures including soil-structure interaction using wavelet weighted least squares support vector machine Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 110 2013 22 33
38. M. Khatibinia, and Sh. Khosravi A hybrid approach based on an improved gravitational search algorithm and orthogonal crossover for optimal shape design of concrete gravity dams Appl. Soft. Comput. 16 2014 223 233
39. V.N. Vapnik The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995 Springer Press New York
40. P.J. Rousseeuw, and A. Leroy Robust Regression and Outlier Detection 1987 Wiley-Interscience New York
41. H.A. David Early sample measures of variability Stat. Sci. 13 1998 368 377
42. J.F. Hall, and A.K. Chopra Dynamic analysis of arch dams including hydrodynamic effects J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 109 1983 149 167
43. K.T. Fang, R. Li, and A. Sudjianto Design and Modelling for Computer Experiments 2006 CRC Press New York
44. M.D. Mckay, R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover A comparison of three methods for selecting values on input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code Technometrics 21 1979 239 245