Reliability-based design optimization of reinforced concrete structures including soil-structure interaction using a discrete gravitational search algorithm and a proposed metamodel

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1147-1165

  Khatibinia, M ^a   Salajegheh, E ^a   Salajegheh, J ^a   Fadaee, M J ^a  

^a SHAHID BAHONAR UNIVERSITY OF KERMAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

discrete gravitational search algorithm; Monte Carlo simulation; reliability based design optimization; wavelet; weighted least squares support vector machine

Indexed keywords

GRAVITATIONAL SEARCH ALGORITHMS; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; WAVELET; WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETES; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MACHINE DESIGN; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84884570552     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2012.725051     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ACI Committee, 2005. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. Applied Technology Council, ATC-40, 1997. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
3. Beyer, H.G. and Sendhoff, B., 2007. Robust optimization-a comprehensive survey. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196, 3190-3218.
4. Calisir, D. and Dogantekin, E., 2011. An automatic diabetes diagnosis system based on LDA-wavelet support vector machine classifier. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8311-8315.
5. Cho, T.M. and Lee, B.C., 2010. Reliability-based design optimization using a family of methods of moving asymptotes. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 42, 255-268.
6. Cho T.M. and Lee, B.C., 2011. Reliability-based design optimization using convex linearization and sequential optimization and reliability assessment method. Structural Safety, 33, 42-50.
7. Coello Coello, C.A., 2002. Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evaluation algorithms: a survey of the state of art. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191, 1245-1287.
8. David, H.A., 1998. Early sample measures of variability. Statistical Science, 13, 368-377.
9. Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., and Bourinet, J.M., 2011. Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44, 673-690.
10. FEMA-356, 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, SAC Joint Venture.
11. Foley, C.M., Pezeshk, S., and Alimoradi, A., 2007. Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel momentresisting frames, I: Formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133, 757-766.
12. Fragiadakis, M. and Papadrakakis, M., 2008. Performance-based optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37, 825-844.
13. Gomes, H.M.,Awruch, A.M., and Lopes, P.A.M., 2011. Reliability based optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks. Structural Safety, 33, 186-195.
14. He, S., et al., 2004. A particle swarm optimizer with passive congregation. BioSystems, 78, 135-147.
15. Jaya, K.P., and Meher Prasad A., 2002. Embedded foundation in layered soil under dynamic excitations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22, 485-498.
16. Kent, D.C. and Park, R., 1997. Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 97, 1969-1990.
17. Khatibinia, M., et al., 2012. Prediction of failure probability for soil-structure interaction system using modified ANFIS by hybrid of FCM-FPSO. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 13, 1-27.
18. Kunnath, S.K., Reinhorn, A.M., and Lobo, R.F., 1992. IDARC Version 3: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of RC structures. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Technical Report NCEER-92-0022.
19. Lagaros, N., Garavelas,A., and Papadrakakis, M., 2008. Innovative seismic design optimization with reliability constraints. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198, 28-41.
20. Lee, I., Choi, K.K., and Zhao, L., 2011. Sampling-based RBDO using the stochastic sensitivity analysis and dynamic kriging method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44, 299-317.
21. Lopez, R.H., et al., 2011. An approach for the reliability based design optimization of laminated composites. Engineering Optimization, 43, 1079-1094.
22. Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R.L., 1969. Finite element model for infinite media. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 95, 859-877.
23. Martinet, R.K., Morlet, J., and Grossmann, A., 1987. Analysis of sound patterns through wavelet transforms. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 1, 273-302.
24. Mckay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., and Conover, W.J., 1979. A comparison of three methods for selecting values on input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 439-445.
25. Möller, O., et al., 2009. Structural optimization for performance-based design in earthquake engineering: applications of neural networks. Structural Safety, 31, 490-499.
26. Neufeld, D., Behdinan, K., and Chung, J., 2010. Aircraft wing box optimization considering uncertainty in surrogate models. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 42, 745-753.
27. OpenSees, 2010. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (PEER) Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
28. Park, G.J., et al., 2006. Robust design: an overview. AIAA Journal, 44, 181-191.
29. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N., 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. 1st ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
30. Rajeev, S. and Krishnamoorthy, C.S., 1992. Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithm. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118, 1233-1250.
31. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., and Saryazdi, S., 2009. GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Information Science, 179, 2232-2248.
32. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., and Saryazdi, S., 2010. BGSA: binary gravitational search algorithm. Natural Computing, 9, 727-745.
33. Saatcioglu, M. and Razvi, S.R., 1992. Strength and ductility of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118, 1590-1607.
34. Salajegheh, E., Gholizadeh, S., and Khatibinia, M., 2008. Optimal design of structures for earthquake loads by a hybrid RBF-BPSO method. Earthquake Engineering and Vibration Engineering, 7, 14-24.
35. Salajegheh, E., et al., 2009. Optimal design of geometrically nonlinear space trusses using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Scientia Iranica, 6, 403-414.
36. Schuëller, G.I. and Jensen, H.A., 2008. Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties-an overview. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198 (1), 2-13.
37. SEAOC Vision 2000, 1995. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
38. Sexsmith, R.G., 1983. Bridge risk assessment and protective design for ship collision. In: Proceedings of the colloquium on ship collision with bridges and offshore structures, international association for bridge and structural engineering, IABSE colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark, 425-433.
39. Seyedpoor, S.M., et al., 2009. Optimum shape design of arch dams for earthquake loading using a fuzzy inference system and wavelet neural networks. Engineering Optimization, 41, 473-493.
40. Shinozuka, M. and Sato, Y., 1967. Simulation of nonstationary random processes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 93, 11-40.
41. Suykens, J.A.K., et al., 2002. Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation. Neurocomputing, 48, 85-105.
42. Wolf, J.P. and Song, Ch., 2002. Some cornerstones of dynamic soil-structure interaction. Engineering Structures, 24, 13-28.
43. Wu, Q., 2011. Hybrid model based onwavelet support vector machine and modified genetic algorithm penalizing Gaussian noises for power load forecasts. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 379-385.
44. Zavar, M., et al., 2011. Evolutionary model selection in a wavelet-based support vector machine for automated seizure detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10751-10758.
45. Zhang,Y., et al., 2008. Two-dimensional nonlinear earthquake response analysis of a bridge-foundation-ground system. Earthquake Spectra, 24, 343-386.