‘Emancipatory’ disability research and special educational needs

The SAGE Handbook of Special Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 233-245

  Barnes, Colin ^a   Sheldon, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918857673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848607989.n18     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Abberley, P.Counting us out: a discussion of the OPCS disability surveys Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2) (1992). 139-155.
2. Albrecht, G. L, Seelman, K., and Bury, M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage.doi:10.4135/9781412976251 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412976251
3. Barnes, C.(1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst and Co. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
4. Barnes, C.Qualitative research: valuable or irrelevant? Disability Handicap and Society 7 (2) (1992). 115-124.
5. Barnes, C., and Mercer, G. (Eds.). (1997). Doing disability research. Leeds: The Disability Press. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
6. Barnes, C., Mercer, G., and Morgan, H.(2000). Creating independent futures, Stage one report. Leeds: Disability Press.
7. Barton, L.(1998). Developing an emancipatory research agenda: Possibilities and dilemmas. In P.Clough, and L.Barton (Eds.), Articulating with difficulty: Research voices in inclusive education (pp. 29-39). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
8. Barton, L.(2005). Special educational needs: an alternative look. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
9. Barton, L., and Oliver, M. (Eds.) (1997). Disability studies: Past, present and future. Leeds: The Disability Press.: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
10. Bourne, J.Cheerleaders and ombudsmen: The sociology of race relations in Britain. Race and Class 21 (4) (1980). 331-352.
11. Cabinet Office. (2005). Improving the life chances of disabled people. London: HMSO.
12. Clifton, M.(2004). 'We like to talk and we like someone to listen': Cultural difference and minority voices as agents of change. In F.Armstrong, and M.Moore (Eds.), Action research for inclusive education: Changing places, changing practices, changing minds (pp. 77-91). London: Routledge Falmer.
13. Clough, P., and Barton, L. (Eds.). (1995a). Making difficulties: Research and the construction of SEN. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
14. Clough, P., and Barton, L.(1995b). Introduction: Self and the research act. In P.Clough, and L.Barton (Eds.), Making difficulties: Research and the construction of SEN (pp. 1-5). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
15. Clough, P., and Barton, L. (Eds.). (1998). Articulating with difficulty: Research voices in inclusive education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
16. Conway, M. A.Introduction: Disability studies meets special education Review of Disability Studies 1 (3) (2004). 3-9.
17. Corbett, J.(1996). Bad-mouthing: The language of special needs. London: Falmer Press.
18. Davis, J. M.Understanding the reflexive meanings of children: A reflexive process. Children and Society 12 (1998). 325-335.
19. Davis, J. M.(2004). Disability and childhood: Deconstructing the stereotypes. In J.Swain, S.French, C.Barnes, and C.Thomas. (Eds.), Disabling barriers - enabling environments (2nd ed.) (pp. 142-148). London: Sage.
20. Davis, J. M., and Hogan, J.(2004). Research with children: Ethnography, participation, disability and self-empowerment. In C.Barnes, and G.Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and practice (pp. 172-190). Leeds: Disability Press.
21. Davis, J. M., and Watson, N.Where are the children's voices? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in 'special' and 'mainstream' schools. Disability and Society 16 (5) (2001). 671-687.
22. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1977). Excellence for all children: Meeting special educational needs. London: Department for Education and Employment.
23. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2001). Special educational needs code of practice. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
24. Dyson, A.(1998). Professional intellectuals from powerful groups: wrong from the start? In P.Clough, and L.Barton (Eds.), Articulating with difficulty: Research voices in inclusive education (pp. 1-15). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
25. Finkelstein, V.Outside, 'inside out'. Coalition, (1996, April). 30-36.
26. Freire, P.(1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
27. Gallagher, M.(2005). Top tips for research and consultation with children and young people. Available at: http://www.crfr.ac.uk/cpd/listeningtochildren/
28. Garth, B., and Aroni, R.'I value what you have to say': Seeking the perspective of children with a disability, not just their parents. Disability and Society 18 (5) (2003). 561-576.
29. Germon, P.(1998). Activists and academics: part of the same or a world apart? In T.Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 245-255). London: Cassell.
30. Goodley, D., and Moore, M.Doing disability research: Activist lives and the academy. Disability and Society 15 (6) (2000). 861-882.
31. Gwynn, J.(2004). 'What about me? I live here too!' Raising voices and changing minds. In F.Armstrong, and M.Moore (Eds.), Action research for inclusive education: Changing places, changing practices, changing minds (pp. 105-122). London: Routledge Falmer.
32. Hunt, P.Settling accounts with the parasite people: A critique of A Life Apart' by E. J. Miller and G. V. Gwynne Disability Challenge 1 (1981). 37-50. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
33. Hurst, R.(1995). International perspectives and solutions. In G.Zarb (Ed.), Removing disabling barriers (89-95). London: Policy Studies Institute.
34. Jary, D., and Jary, J. (Eds.). (1995). Collins dictionary of sociology: Second edition. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
35. Kelly, L., Burton, S., and Regan, L.(1994) Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In M.Maynard, and J.Purvis (Eds.), Researching women's lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27-48). London: Taylor and Francis.
36. Kemmis, S.(1982). Introduction: Action research in retrospect and prospect. In S.Kemmis (Ed.), The action research reader (pp. 11-31). Waurn Ponds, Australia: Deakin University.
37. Kitchin, R.The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society 15 (1) (2000). 25-47.
38. Martin, J., Meltzer, H., and Elliot, D.(1988). The prevalence of disability among adults. London: HMSO.
39. Mason, J.(1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
40. Morris, J.(1999). Disabled children, the Children's Act and human rights. Paper presented at Young and Powerful conference, May 26, Disability North. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
41. Morris, J.(2003). Including all children: finding out about the experiences of disabled children. Presentation at Childhood Disability Research Forum. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
42. Oliver, M.(1990). The politics of disablement. Tavistock: Macmillan. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
43. Oliver, M.Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2) (1992). 101-114.
44. Oliver, M.(1996). Defining impairment and disability: Issues at stake. In C.Barnes, and G.Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability (pp. 39-54). Leeds: Disability Press.
45. Oliver, M.(1997). Emancipatory research: Realistic goal or impossible dream? In C.Barnes, and G.Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research. Leeds: Disability Press. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
46. Oliver, M.(1999). Final accounts and the parasite people. In M.Corker, and S.French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 183-192). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
47. Oliver, M., and Zarb, G.(1992). Personal assistance schemes in Greenwich: An evaluation. London: University of Greenwich.
48. Priestley, M.(1997). Who's research? A personal audit. In C.Barnes, and G.Mercer (Eds.), Doing disability research (pp. 88-107). Leeds: Disability Press. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
49. Riddell, S., Wilkinson, H., and Baron, S.(1998). From emancipatory research to focus group: People with learning difficulties and the research process. In P.Clough, and L.Barton (Eds.), Articulating with difficulty: Research voices in inclusive education (pp. 78-95). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
50. Rioux, M. H., and Bach, M. (Eds.). (1994). Disability is not measles: New research paradigms in disability. Toronto: Roeher Institute.
51. Shakespeare, T.Rules of engagement: Doing disability research. Disability and Society 11 (2) (1996). 115-119.
52. Sheldon, A.Personal and perplexing: Feminist disability politics evaluated Disability and Society 14 (5) (1999). 645-659.
53. Stanley, L., and Wise, S.(1993). Breaking out again: Feminist ontology and epistemology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
54. Stone, E., and Priestley, M.Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology 47 (4) (1996). 699-716.
55. Thomas, C.(1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disabilityBuckingham: Open University Press.
56. Thomas, C.(2001). Feminism and disability: The theoretical and political significance of the personal and experiential. In L.Barton (Ed.), Disability politics and the struggle for change(pp. 48-58). London: David Fulton.
57. Tomlinson, S.(1982). A sociology of special education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
58. Triano, S. L.Categorical eligibility for special education: The enshrinement of the medical model in disability policy. Disability Studies Quarterly 20 (4) (2000). 1-16. Retrieved October 20, 2005 from http://www.cds.hawaii.edu
59. Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976). Fundamental principles of disabilityLondon: Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html
60. Vulliamy, G., and Webb, R.(1995). Special educational needs: From disciplinary to pedagogic research, in P.Potts, F.Armstrong, and M.Masterton (Eds.), Equality and diversity in education 2: National and international contexts (pp. 261-278). London: Routledge/The Open University.
61. Ward, L., and Flynn, M.(1994). What matters most: Disability, research and empowerment. In M. H.Rioux, and M.Bach (Eds.). Disability is not measles: New research paradigms in disability (pp. 29-48). Toronto: Roeher Institute.
62. Warnock Report. (1978). Special educational needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the education of children and young people. London: HMSO.
63. World Health Organization (WHO). (1999). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/icidh/
64. Wood, P.(1981). International classification of impairment, disability and handicap. Geneva: WHO.
65. Zarb, G.On the road to Damascus: First steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability Handicap and Society 7 (2) (1992). 125-138.
66. Zarb, G., and Nadash, P.(1994). Cashing in on independence. Derby: British Council of Disabled People. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/index.html