Gli esperimenti di scelta a supporto della pianificazione forestale in Sicilia

Aestimum

Volumn 60, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-25

  De Salvo, Maria ^a   Signorello, Giovanni ^a   Missiato, Arturo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Choice experiments; Esperimenti di scelta; Forest planning; Pianificazione forestale

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918834834     PISSN: 15926117     EISSN: 17242118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.13128/Aestimum-11268     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. (1998). Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 64-75
2. Bennett J., Blamey R. (2001). The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham (UK), Edward Elgar Publishing
3. Birol E., Koundouri P. (eds.) (2008). Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy. Cheltenham (UK), Edward Elgar Publishing
4. Brey R., Riera P., Mogas J. (2007). Estimation of forest values using choice modelling: An application to Spanish forests. Ecological Economics, 64: 305-312
5. Boxall P.C., Macnab B. (2000). Exploring the preferences of wildlife recreationists for features of boreal forest management: a choice experiment approach. Canadian Journal of forest research 30: 1931-1941
6. Croitoru L. (2007). Valuing the non-timber forest products in the Mediterranean region. Ecological Economics 63(4): 768-775
7. Garrod G., Snowdon P. (2004). Measuring Willingness to Pay for Forest Landscapes: A Choice Experiment Approach using Computer-Generated Images. International Conference on Economics of Sustainable Forest Management, University of Toronto, 20-22 May 2004
8. Green W. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall
9. Hanley N., Wright R.E., Adamowicz V. (1998). Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3-4): 413-428
10. Horne P. (2006). Forest owerns' acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment based approach. Silva Fennica 40: 169-178
11. Horne P., Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. (2005). Multiple-use management of forest recreation site: a spatially explicit choice experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 207: 189-199
12. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press
13. Lancaster K. (1996). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy. 74: 132-157
14. Lehtonen E., Kuuluvainen J., Pouta E., Rekola M., Li C.Z. (2003). No-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. Environmental Sciente and Policy 6(3): 195-204
15. Louviere J.J., Henser D.A., Swait J.D. (2000). Stated Choice Model: Analysis and Application. Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press
16. McFadden D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press: 5-142
17. Merlo M., Croitoru L. (edit.) (2005) Valuing Mediterranean forests: Towards Total Economic Value. CABI Publishing
18. Riera P., Mogas J. (2004). Evaluation of a Risk Reduction in Forest Fires in a Mediterranean Region. Forest Policy and Economics 6: 521-528
19. Train K.E. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations. Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press
20. Willis K.G., Garrod G., Scarpa R., Powe N.A., Lovett A., Bateman I.J., Hanley N., MacMillan D. (2003). The social and environmental benfits of forests in Great Britain. Social & Environmental Benefits of Forestry Phase 2:, Report to Forestry Commission, Edinburgh