Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 5041-5059

  Pastor, A V ^a   Ludwig, F ^a   Biemans, H ^a   Hoff, H ^b,c   Kabat, P ^a,d  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEOLOGY; WATER;

ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTRA-ANNUAL VARIABILITY; NATURAL FLOW REGIME; RIVERINE ECOSYSTEMS; WATER REQUIREMENTS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; ANNUAL VARIATION; FLOW PATTERN; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LOW FLOW; RIVER SYSTEM; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

AMAZON RIVER; NILE RIVER;

EID: 84918557057     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-5041-2014     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., Bryer, M., Kottelat, M., Bogutskaya, N., Coad, B., Mandrak, N., Balderas, S. C., and Bussing, W.: Freshwater ecoregions of the world: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation, Bioscience, 58, 403-414, 2008.
2. Acreman, M., Dunbar, M., Hannaford, J., Mountford, O., Wood, P., Holmes, N., Cowx, I., Noble, R., Extence, C., and Aldrick, J.: Developing environmental standards for abstractions from uk rivers to implement the eu water framework directive/développement de standards environnementaux sur les prélèvements d'eau en rivière au royaume uni pour la mise en oeuvre de la directive cadre sur l'eau de l'union européenne, Hydrol. Sci. J., 53, 1105-1120, 2008.
3. Alcamo, J., Flörke, M., and Märker, M.: Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes, Hydrol. Sci. J., 52, 247-275, 2007.
4. Alexandratos, N. and Bruinsma, J.: World agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision, ESA Working paper, 2012.
5. Allain, M. and El-Jabi, N.: Hydrological approach to instream flow evaluation: A sensitivity analysis, Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2002.
6. Armstrong, D. S., Todd, A., and Parker, G.W.: Assessment of habitat, fish communities, and streamflow requirements for habitat protection, ipswich river, Massachusetts, 1998-99, Issue 1, Dept. of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2001 1999.
7. Arnell, N. W.: Climate change and global water resources: Sres emissions and socio-economic scenarios, Global Environ. Change, 14, 31-52, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.006, 2004.
8. Arthington, A. H., Rall, J. L., Kennard, M. J., and Pusey, B. J.: Environmental flow requirements of fish in lesotho rivers using the drift methodology, River Res. Applic., 19, 641-666, 2003.
9. Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., and Naiman, R. J.: The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems, Ecol. Appl., 16, 1311-1318, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2., 2006.
10. Babel, M. S., Dinh, C. N., Mullick, M. R. A., and Nanduri, U. V.: Operation of a hydropower system considering environmental flow requirements: A case study in la nga river basin, vietnam, J. Hydro-Environ. Res., 6, 63-73, doi:10.1016/j.jher.2011.05.006, 2012.
11. Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., Brown, J. H., Fortelius, M., Getz, W. M., Harte, J., Hastings, A., and Marquet, P. A.: Approaching a state shift in earth/'s biosphere, Nature, 486, 52-58, 2012.
12. Bejarano, D. M., Nilsson, C., Del tanago, G. M., and Marchamalo, M.: Responses of riparian trees and shrubs to flow regulation along a boreal stream in northern sweden, Freshw. Biol., 56, 853-866, 2011.
13. Biemans, H., Haddeland, I., Kabat, P., Ludwig, F., Hutjes, R., Heinke, J., von Bloh, W., and Gerten, D.: Impact of reservoirs on river discharge and irrigation water supply during the 20th century, Water Resour. Res., 47, W03509, doi:10.1029/2009WR008929, 2011.
14. Bigas, H. E.: The global water crisis: Addressing an urgent security issue, UNU-INWEH, Hamilton, Canada, 2012.
15. Bond, N. R., Lake, P., and Arthington, A. H.: The impacts of drought on freshwater ecosystems: An australian perspective, Hydrobiologia, 600, 3-16, 2008.
16. Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Cramer, W., Gerten, D., Lotze Campen, H., Müller, C., and Reichstein, M.: Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance, Global Change Biol., 13, 679-706, 2007.
17. Botter, G., Basso, S., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A.: Resilience of river flow regimes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 12925-12930, 2013.
18. Bovee, K. D.: Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology, National Ecology Center, Division of Wildlife and Contaminant Research, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, 1986.
19. Bovee, K. D., Lamb, B. L., Bartholow, J. M., Stalnaker, C. B., and Taylor, J.: Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology, US Geological Survey-BDR, Fort Collins, CO, USA, p. 130, 1998.
20. Bunn, S. E. and Arthington, A. H.: Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity, Environ. Manage., 30, 492-507, doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0, 2002.
21. Capra, H., Sabaton, C., Gouraud, V., Souchon, Y., and Lim, P.: A population dynamics model and habitat simulation as a tool to predict brown trout demography in natural and bypassed stream reaches, River Res. Appl., 19, 551-568, doi:10.1002/Rra.729, 2003.
22. Changming, L. and Shifeng, Z.: Drying up of the yellow river: Its impacts and counter-measures, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 203-214, doi:10.1023/a:1024408310869, 2002.
23. Council, E. P.: Directive of the european parliament and of the council 2000/60/ec establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, European Commission PE-CONS, 3639, 100, 2000.
24. Declaration, T. B.: The brisbane declaration: Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human wellbeing, Declaration of the 10th International River Symposium, 3-6 September 2007, Brisbane, Australia, 2007.
25. Döll, P., Kaspar, F., and Lehner, B.: A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: Model tuning and validation, J. Hydrol., 270, 105-134, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00283-4, 2003.
26. Doupé, R. and Pettit, N.: Ecological perspectives on regulation and water allocation for the ord river, western australia, River Res. Appl., 18, 307-320, 2002.
27. Dudgeon, D.: Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical asia: Prospects for riverine biodiversity, Bioscience, 50, 793-806, 2000.
28. DWAF: White paper on a national water policy for south africa, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa, 1997.
29. Espegren, G. D.: Evaluation of the standards and methods used for quantifying instream flows in colorado, Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver, CO, USA, 1998.
30. Estes, C. C.: Annual summary of instream flow reservations and protection in alaska, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Research and Technical Services, 1998.
31. Fader, M., Rost, S., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., and Gerten, D.: Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: Present and potential future patterns, J. Hydrol., 384, 218-231, 2010.
32. Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Haberlandt, U., Lucht, W., and Sitch, S.: Terrestrial vegetation and water balance - hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model, J. Hydrol., 286, 249-270, 2004.
33. Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Rockström, J., Jägermeyr, J., Kummu, M., and Pastor, A. V.: Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use: role of environmental flow requirements, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 551-558, doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.001, 2013.
34. Gippel, C. J. and Stewardson, M. J.: Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows, Regulated rivers: Res. Manage., 14, 53-67, 1998.
35. Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F., and van Beek, L. P.: Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint, Nature, 488, 197-200, 2012.
36. Gleick, P. H.: Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century, Science, 302, 1524-1528, 2003.
37. Haines, A., Finlayson, B., and McMahon, T.: A global classification of river regimes, Appl. Geogr., 8, 255-272, 1988.
38. Hanasaki, N., Kanae, S., Oki, T., Masuda, K., Motoya, K., Shirakawa, N., Shen, Y., and Tanaka, K.: An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources - Part 1: Model description and input meteorological forcing, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1007-1025, doi:10.5194/hess-12-1007-2008, 2008.
39. Hessari, B., Bruggeman, A., Akhoond-Ali, A., Oweis, T., and Abbasi, F.: Supplemental irrigation potential and impact on downstream flow of Karkheh River Basin of Iran, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 13519-13536, doi:10.5194/hessd-9-13519-2012, 2012.
40. Hoekstra, A. Y. and Mekonnen, M. M.: Global water scarcity: The monthly blue water footprint compared to blue water availability for the world's major river basins, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands, No. 53, 78 pp., 2011.
41. Hoekstra, A. Y. and Mekonnen, M. M.: The water footprint of humanity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 3232-3237, doi:10.1073/pnas.1109936109, 2012.
42. Hoekstra, A. Y., Mekonnen, M. M., Chapagain, A. K., Mathews, R. E., and Richter, B. D.: Global monthly water scarcity: Blue water footprints versus blue water availability, PLoS One, 7, 2:e32688, 2012.
43. Hoff, H., Falkenmark, M., Gerten, D., Gordon, L., Karlberg, L., and Rockström, J.: Greening the global water system, J. Hydrol., 384, 177-186, 2010.
44. Hughes, D. A.: Providing hydrological information and data analysis tools for the determination of ecological instream flow requirements for south african rivers, J. Hydrol., 241, 140-151, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00378-4, 2001.
45. Hugues, F. M. R. and Rood, S. B.: Allocation of river flows for restoration of floodplain forest ecosystems: A review of approaches and their applicability in europe, Environ. Manage., 32, 12-33, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-2834-8, 2003.
46. Iwasaki, Y., Ryo, M., Sui, P., and Yoshimura, C.: Evaluating the relationship between basin-scale fish species richness and ecologically relevant flow characteristics in rivers worldwide, Freshw. Biol., 57, 2173-2180, 2012.
47. Yoshikawa, S., Yanagawa, A., Iwasaki, Y., Sui, P., Koirala, S., Hirano, K., Khajuria, A., Mahendran, R., Hirabayashi, Y., Yoshimura, C., and Kanae, S.: Illustrating a new global-scale approach to estimating potential reduction in fish species richness due to flow alteration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 621-630, doi:10.5194/hess-18-621-2014, 2014.
48. Jowett, I.: River hydraulic and habitat simulation, rhyhabsim computer manual, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Christchurch, New Zealand, Report 49, 39 pp., 1989.
49. Kashaigili, J. J., McCartney, M., and Mahoo, H. F.: Estimation of environmental flows in the great ruaha river catchment, tanzania, Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 32, 1007-1014, doi:10.1016/j.pce.2007.07.005, 2007.
50. Kennard, M. J., Mackay, S. J., Pusey, B. J., Olden, J. D., and Marsh, N.: Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of hydrologic metrics for ecohydrological studies, River Res. Appl., 26, 137-156, 2010.
51. King, J. and Louw, D.: Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in south africa using the building block methodology, Aqua. Ecosyst. Health Manage., 1, 109-124, doi:10.1080/14634989808656909, 1998.
52. King, J. and Brown, C.: Integrated basin flow assessments: Concepts and method development in africa and southeast asia, Freshw. Biol., 55, 127-146, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02316.x, 2010.
53. Kingsford, R. T. and Auld, K. M.: Waterbird breeding and environmental flow management in the macquarie marshes, arid australia, River Res. Appl., 21, 187-200, doi:10.1002/Rra.840, 2005.
54. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. (1984-2012), 99, 14415-14428, 1994.
55. Loh, J., Collen, B., McRae, L., Deinet, S., De Palma, A., Manley, R., and Baillie, J. E. M.: Living planet report 2010, WWF International, Gland, Switzerland, 2010.
56. Marchetti, M. P. and Moyle, P. B.: Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated california stream, Ecol. Appl., 11, 530-539, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0530:EOFROF]2.0.CO;2, 2001.
57. Mathews, R. and Richter, B. D.: Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43, 1400-1413, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00099.x, 2007.
58. McMahon, T. A., Peel, M. C., Vogel, R. M., and Pegram, G. G. S.: Global streamflows - part 3: Country and climate zone characteristics, J. Hydrol., 347, 272-291, 2007.
59. McManamay, R. A., Orth, D. J., Dolloff, C. A., and Mathews, D. C.: Application of the eloha framework to regulated rivers in the upper tennessee river basin: A case study, Environ. Manage., 51, 1-26, 2013.
60. Milhous, R. T.: History, theory, use, and limitations of the physical habitat simulation system, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Utah State University Extension. Logan, Utah, 1999
61. Logan, Utah, 1999, Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
62. NGPRP: Instream needs sub-group report, Environmental Quality Council, Helena, Mont., USA, 244 pp., 1974.
63. O'Keeffe, J.: Sustaining river ecosystems: Balancing use and protection, Progr. Phys. Geogr., 33, 339-357, doi:10.1177/0309133309342645, 2009.
64. O'Keeffe, J. and Quesne, T.: Keeping rivers alive: A primer on environmental flows, Wwf water security series 2, 39 pp., 2009.
65. Oberdorff, T., Tedesco, P. A., Hugueny, B., Leprieur, F., Beauchard, O., Brosse, S., and Dürr, H. H.: Global and regional patterns in riverine fish species richness: A review, Int. J. Ecol., 967631, 12 pp., doi:10.1155/2011/967631, 2011.
66. Pahl-Wostl, C., Arthington, A., Bogardi, J., Bunn, S. E., Hoff, H., Lebel, L., Nikitina, E., Palmer, M., Poff, L. N., Richards, K., Schlüter, M., Schulze, R., St-Hilaire, A., Tharme, R., Tockner, K., and Tsegai, D.: Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses, Current Opinion Environ. Sustain., 5, 341-351, doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009, 2013.
67. Palau, A.: Integrated environmental management of current reservoirs and regulated rivers, Limnetica, 25, 287-302, 2006.
68. Palau, A. and Alcázar, J.: The basic flow method for incorporating flow variability in environmental flows, River Res. Appli., 28, 93-102, 2010.
69. Palmer, M. A., Reidy Liermann, C. A., Nilsson, C., Flörke, M., Alcamo, J., Lake, P. S., and Bond, N.: Climate change and the world's river basins: Anticipating management options, Front. Ecol. Environ., 6, 81-89, 2008.
70. Pettit, N. E., Froend, R. H., and Davies, P. M.: Identifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting western australian rivers, Regul. Rivers-Res. Manage., 17, 201-215, doi:10.1002/Rrr.624, 2001.
71. Poff, N. L., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Naiman, R. J., Kendy, E., Acreman, M., Apse, C., Bledsoe, B. P., and Freeman, M. C.: The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (eloha): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards, Freshw. Biol., 55, 147-170, 2009.
72. Poff, N. L. and Zimmerman, J. K.: Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows, Freshw. Biol., 55, 194-205, 2010.
73. Pokhrel, Y., Hanasaki, N., Koirala, S., Cho, J., Yeh, P. J. F., Kim, H., Kanae, S., and Oki, T.: Incorporating anthropogenic water regulation modules into a land surface model, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 255-269, doi:10.1175/jhm-d-11-013.1, 2011.
74. Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.: Mirca2000 - global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1011, doi:10.1029/2008gb003435, 2010.
75. Pouilly, M. and Aguilera, G.: Evaluación inicial de caudales ecológicos/ambientales en la cuenca del río huasco - chile, mediante la simulación del hábitat físico del pejerrey basilichthys microlepidotus y el camarón de río cryphiops caementarius, UICN, Quito, Ecuador., 57, 2012.
76. Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J., Wigington, R., and Braun, D.: How much water does a river need?, Freshw. Biol., 37, 231-249, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x, 1997.
77. Richter, B. D., Mathews, R., Harrison, D. L., and Wigington, R.: Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity, Ecol. Appl., 13, 206-224, doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2, 2003.
78. Richter, B. D., Warner, A. T., Meyer, J. L., and Lutz, K.: A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations, River Res. Appl., 22, 297-318, 2006.
79. Richter, B. D.: Re-thinking environmental flows: From allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries, River Res. Appl., 26, 1052-1063, 2010.
80. Richter, B. D., Davis, M. M., Apse, C., and Konrad, C.: A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection, River Res. Appl., 28, 1312-1321, 2012.
81. Rockström, J., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Hoff, H., Rost, S., and Gerten, D.: Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00A12, doi:10.1029/2007wr006767, 2009.
82. Rost, S., Gerten, D., Bondeau, A., Lucht, W., Rohwer, J., and Schaphoff, S.: Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system, Water Resources Research, 44, W09405, doi:10.1029/2007wr006331, 2008.
83. Shafroth, P. B., Wilcox, A. C., Lytle, D. A., Hickey, J. T., Andersen, D. C., Beauchamp, V. B., Hautzinger, A., Mcmullen, L. E., and Warner, A.: Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: Modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river, Freshw. Biol., 55, 68-85, 2009.
84. Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J., Levis, S., Lucht, W., and Sykes, M. T.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Change Biol., 9, 161-185, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x, 2003.
85. Smakhtin, V., Revenga, C., and Doll, P.: A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity, Water Int., 29, 307-317, 2004.
86. Smakhtin, V. U., Shilpakar, R. L., and Hughes, D. A.: Hydrologybased assessment of environmental flows: An example from nepal, Hydrol. Sci. J., 51, 207-222, doi:10.1623/hysj.51.2.207, 2006.
87. Sun, T., Yang, Z., and Cui, B.: Critical environmental flows to support integrated ecological objectives for the yellow river estuary, china, Water Resour. Manage., 22, 973-989, 2008.
88. Symphorian, G. R., Madamombe, E., and van der Zaag, P.: Dam operation for environmental water releases; the case of osborne dam, save catchment, zimbabwe, Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 28, 985-993, 2003.
89. Telis, P. A. and District, P. H. W.: Techniques for estimating 7-day, 10-year low-flow characteristics for ungaged sites on streams in mississippi, US Geological Survey, Tallahassee, MS, USA, Water-Resources Invertigations Report 91-4130, 143 pp., 1992.
90. Tennant, D. L.: Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources, Fisheries, 1, 6-10, 1976.
91. Tessmann, S.: Environmental assessment, technical appendix e in environmental use sector reconnaissance elements of the western dakotas region of south dakota study. South dakota state university, Water Resources Institute, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, 1980.
92. Tharme, R. E.: A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers, River Res. Appl., 19, 397-441, doi:10.1002/Rra.736, 2003.
93. van Beek, L. P. H., Wada, Y., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07517, doi:10.1029/2010wr009791, 2011.
94. Vliet, M. H., Ludwig, F., and Kabat, P.: Global streamflow and thermal habitats of freshwater fishes under climate change, Climatic Change, 121, 739-754, doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0976-0, 2013.
95. Vorosmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S. E., Sullivan, C. A., Liermann, C. R., and Davies, P. M.: Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity Nature, 468, 334-334, doi:10.1038/Nature09549, 2010.
96. Werth, S. and Güntner, A.: Calibration analysis for water storage variability of the global hydrological model wghm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 59-78, doi:10.5194/hess-14-59-2010, 2010.
97. Xenopoulos, M. A., Lodge, D. M., Alcamo, J., Märker, M., Schulze, K., and Van Vuuren, D. P.: Scenarios of freshwater fish extinctions from climate change and water withdrawal, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1557-1564, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001008.x, 2005.
98. Yasi, M., Karimi, S. S., and Yasi, A.: Eco-hydrological approach for determining environmental flows in rivers 9th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics 2012, Vienna, Austria, 17-21 September 2012.
99. Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Levin, S. A.: Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the mekong river basin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 5609-5614, 2012.