The evolution and future of ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines: A 30-year journey a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines

Circulation

Volumn 130, Issue 14, 2014, Pages 1208-1217

  Jacobs, Alice K ^a   Anderson, Jeffrey L ^a   Halperin, Jonathan L ^a   Albert, Nancy M ^a   Bozkurt, Biykem ^a   Brindis, Ralph G ^a   Curtis, Lesley H ^a   DeMets, David ^a   Fleisher, Lee A ^a   Gidding, Samuel ^a   Hochman, Judith S ^a   Kovacs, Richard J ^a   Ohman, E Magnus ^a   Pressler, Susan J ^a   Sellke, Frank W ^a   Shen, Win Kuang ^a   Wijeysundera, Duminda N ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; BOARD OF TRUSTEES; CARDIOLOGIST; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSENSUS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PUBLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; STANDARDS; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION; CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84918553076     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000090     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
2. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
3. Jacobs AK, Kushner FG, Ettinger SM, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:268-310.
4. Bittl JA, He Y, Jacobs AK, et al. Bayesian methods affirm the use of percutaneous coronary intervention to improve survival in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2013;127:2177-85.
5. Peterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, et al. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006;295:1912-20.
6. Fonarow GC. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE): opportunities to improve care of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;4 Suppl 7:S21-30.
7. Kung J, Miller RR, Mackowiak PA. Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet Institute of Medicine standards: two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1628-33.
8. Shaneyfelt T. In guidelines we cannot trust. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172: 1633-34.
9. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Methodology Manual and Policies From the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Available at: http://assets.cardiosource.com/Methodology-Manual-for-ACC-AHA- Writing-Committees.pdf and http://my.americanheart.org/idc/groups/ ahamah-public/@wcm/@sop/documents/downloadable/ucm-319826. pdf. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. Accessed May 12, 2014.
10. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301:868-9.
11. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2014;129:e521-643.
12. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2008;117:296-329.
13. King SB III, Smith SC Jr., Hirshfeld JW Jr., et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, writing on behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee. Circulation. 2008;117:261-95.
14. Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, et al. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005;111:1703-12.
15. Spertus JA, Bonow RO, Chan P, et al. ACCF/AHA new insights into the methodology of performance measurement: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation. 2010;122:2091-106.
16. Antman EM, Peterson ED. Tools for guiding clinical practice from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology: what are they and how should clinicians use them? Circulation. 2009;119:1180-5.
17. Anderson JL, Heidenreich PA, Barnett PG, et al. ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2329-45.
18. Lauer MS, D'Agostino RB Sr. The randomized registry trial-the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med. 2013;369: 1579-81.