Special education in Ontario, Canada: A case study of market-based reforms

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 349-371

  Jordan, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918537787     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640120086602     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AINSCOW, M., 1995. “ Special needs through school improvement; school improvement through special needs ”. In Toward Inclusive Schools?, Edited by: CLARK, C., DYSON, A., and MlLLWARD, A., New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2. BARNES, C., MERCER, G., and SHAKESPEARE, T., 1999. Exploring Disability: a sociological introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. BOOTH, T., 2000. Inclusion in Education: participation of disabled learners. Executive summary: Thematic study for the EFA2000 assessment, UNESCO. report to
4. BROWN, D., MOORE, D. W., THOMSON, C., ANDERSON, A., WALKER, J., GLYNN, T., MACFARLANE, A., MEDCALF, J., and YSSELDYKE, J., 1999. “ Resource teachers' learning and behaviour: an ecological approach to special education ”. Victoria University of Wellington. unpublished manuscript
5. DEMERIS, H., The impact of students with disabilities on average class achievement. paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Educational Researchers Association. AlbertaMay, Edmonton.
6. FLORIAN, L., and PULLIN, D., 2000. “ Defining difference: a comparative perspective on legal and policy issues in education reform and special educational needs ”. In Special Education and School Reform in the United States and Britain, Edited by: MCLAUGHLIN, M. J., and ROUSE, M., London: Routledge.
7. FRIEND, M., and COOK, L., 2000. Interactions: collaborative skills for school professionals, 3rd Edn, New York, NY: Longmans.
8. GARTNER, A., and LIPSKY, D. K., 1987. Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57: 367–395.
9. GIANGRECO, M. F., DENNIS, R., CLONINGER, C., EDELMAN, S., and SCHATTMAN, R., 1993. 'I've counted Jon': Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59: 359–372.
10. GROSSMAN, A., and JORDAN, A., 1998. Special education in Ontario: are we selling our children short?. School Business Affairs, 64(8): 29–35.
11. JORDAN, A., 1994. Skills in Collaborative Classroom Consultation, London: Routledge.
12. JORDAN, A., and STANOVICH, P., Exemplary practices of elementary classroom teachers in integrating exceptional and at-risk students. paper presented at AERA. April, New York, NY.
13. JORDAN, A., KIRCAALI-IFTAR, G., and DIAMOND, C. T. P., 1993. Who has a problem, the student or the teacher? Differences in teachers' beliefe about their work with at-risk and integrated exceptional students, International Journal of Disability. Development and Education, 40(1): 45–62.
14. JORDAN, A., LINDSAY, L., and STANOVICH, P., 1997. Classroom teachers' interactions with students who are normally achieving, at-risk and exceptional. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2): 82–83.
15. MCDONNELL, L. M., MCLAUGHLIN, M. J., and MORISON., P., 1997. Educating One and AIl: students with disabilities and standards-based reform, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. MCLAUGHLIN, M., and ROUSE, M., 2000. “ Introduction: the struggles for reform ”. In Special Education and School Reform in the United States and Britain, Edited by: MCLAUGHLIN, M., and ROUSE, M., London: Routledge.
17. MCLAUGHLIN, M., and TlLSTONE, C., 2000. “ Standards and curriculum: the core of educational reform ”. In Special Education and School Reform in the United States and Britain, Edited by: McLAUGHLIN, M. J., and ROUSE, M., London: Routledge.
18. MCLAUGHLIN, M., NOLET, V., RHIM, L. M., and HENDERSON, K., 1999. Integrating standards: including all students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3): 66–71.
19. MlTCHELL, D., 1996. The rules keep changing: special education in a reforming educational system. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 43(1): 55–74.
20. MITCHELL, D., 2001. Special education: a decade of reform. New Zealand Journal of Education Studies.
21. MOORE, D., MACFARLANE, A., ANDERSON, A., BROWN, D., TIMPERLEY, H., THOMSON, C., and GLYNN., T., 1999. Caught Between Stories: special education in New Zealand, Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
22. NEW ZEALAND MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. 1998. Meeting your Chad's Special Education Needs: special education 2000-getting it right, Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
23. NOLET, V., and MCLAUGHLIN, M. J., 2000. Accessing the General Curriculum: including students with disabilities in standards-based reform, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24. OLIVER, M., 1990. The Politics of Disablement, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
25. OLSON, J. F., and GOLDSTEIN, A. A., 1996. Increasing the inclusion of students with disability and Limited English Proficiency students in NAEP, NCES document 96-894. Focus on NAEP, 2(1): 1–5.
26. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. 1998. Individual Education Plan (IEP) Resource Guide, Toronto: Queen's Printers for Ontario.
27. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. 1999. Quick facts 1998-1999. available at http://mettowas21.edu.gov.on.ca:80/eng/general/elemsec/quickfacts/l998-99/
28. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. 2000a. 2000-2001 Resource Manual for the Special Education Grant Intensive Support Amount (ISA). Guidelines for school boards, Toronto: Queen's Printers for Ontario.
29. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION. 2000b. Individual Education Plans. Standards for development, program planning, and implementation, Toronto: Queen's Printers for Ontario.
30. ONTARIO MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING. 1984. Handbook of Special Education, Toronto: Queen's Printers for Ontario.
31. PAJARES, M. F., 1992. Teacher beliefe and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3): 307–332.
32. POPHAM, W. J., 1999. Classroom Assessment: what teachers need to know, 2nd Edn, Needham Heights, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
33. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO (1980) Ontario Education Amendment Act, Revised Statutes of Ontario, 1980, c. 129; RSO 1990, c. E2
34. PUGACH, M. C., and JOHNSON, L. J., 1995. Collaborative Practitioners, Collaborative Schools, Denver, CO: Love.
35. PULLIN, H., 1994. Learning to work: the impact of curriculum and assessment standards on educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 64(1): 31–54.
36. PULLIN, H., and ZIRKEL, P., 1988. Testing students with handicapping conditions. Education Law Reporter,: 444
37. ROACH, D., 1998. “ Factors that affect the instructional interactions of teachers with exceptional, at-risk and typically achieving students ”. OISE/University of Toronto. inpublished PhD thesis
38. ROUSE, M., SHRINER, J. G., and DANIELSON, L., 2000. “ National assessment and special education in the United States, and England and Wales ”. In Special Education and School Reform in the United States and Britain, Edited by: MCLAUGHUN, M. J., and ROUSE, M., London: Routledge.
39. SARASON, S., and DORIS, J., 1979. Educational Handicap, public Policy, and Social History, New York, NY: Free Press.
40. SIEGEL, L., 1989a. Why we do not need intelligence test scores in the definition and analysis of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(8): 469–478.
41. SIEGEL, L., 1989b. IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabaities, 22(8): 469–478. 486
42. SLEE, R., 1997. Imported or important theory? Sociological interrogations of disablement and special education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18: 407–419.
43. STANOVICH, K. E., 1991. Discrepancy definitions of learning disability: has intelligence led us astray?. Reading Research Quarterly, 26: 7–29.
44. STANOVICH, K. E., 1994. Annotation: Does dyslexia exist?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35: 579–595.
45. STANOVICH, P., and JORDAN, A., 1998. Canadian teachers' and principals' beliefe about inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 98: 221–238.
46. TINDAL, G., HEATH, B., HOLLENBECK, K., ALMOND, P., and HARNISS, M., 1998. Accommodating students with disabilities in large scale assessments: an empirical study. Exceptional Children, 64: 439–450.
47. THOMAS, G., 1992. Effective Cclassroom Teamwork: support or intrusion?, London: Routledge.
48. UNESCO. 1990. World Declaration of Education for Au, Paris: UNESCO.
49. UNESCO. 1993. The Standard Rules for the Equalisation of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, Paris: UNESCO.
50. UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework on Special Needs Education, Paris: UNESCO.
51. USHER, L., 1987. “ Special education appeal boards in Ontario ”. University of Toronto. unpublished doctoral thesis
52. WARNOCK, M., 1996. “ The work of the Warnock Committee ”. In Changing Policy and Practice for People with Learning Disabilities, Edited by: MITTLER, P., and SINASON, V., London: Cassell.
53. WEBER, K., and BENNETT, S., 1999. Special Education in Ontario Schools, Toronto: Highland Press.