How satisfaction is achieved in the implementation phase of large transportation infrastructure projects: A qualitative comparative analysis into the A2 tunnel project

Public Works Management and Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-28

  Verweij, Stefan ^a   Gerrits, Lasse M ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complexity; Evaluation; mvQCA; Project management; Public private cooperation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918537157     PISSN: 1087724X     EISSN: 15527549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087724X13518743     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sneller en beter: Advies commissie versnelling besluitvorming infrastructurele projecten. The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport and Public Works; 2008:
2. Atkinson R.,Crawford L.,Ward S.Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management.International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24:687-698
3. Boeije H.Analysis in qualitative research. London, England: Sage; 2010:
4. Byrne D. S.Complexity, configurations and cases.Theory, Culture & Society. 2005;22:95-111
5. Byrne D. S.Applying social science: The role of social research in politics, policy and practice. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press; 2011a:
6. Byrne D. S.The SAGE handbook of complexity and management. Allen P.Maguire S.McKelvey B., ed. London, England: Sage; 2011b:131-141.
7. Cicmil S.,Williams T.,Thomas J.,Hodgson D.Rethinking project management: Researching the actuality of projects.International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24:675-686
8. Cronqvist L.Tosmana: Tool for small-n analysis 1.3.2.0. Trier, Germany: University of Trier; 2011:
9. Cronqvist L.,Berg-Schlosser D.Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Rihoux B.Ragin C. C., ed. London, England: Sage; 2009:69-86.
10. De Hoo SBesluitvorming en rijkswegenaanleg: Analyse van het besluitvormingsproces over rijkswegenprojecten. Leiden, The Netherlands: Sociologisch Instituut Rijksuniversiteit Leiden; 1982:
11. Edelenbos J.,Klijn E. H.Project versus process management in public-private partnership: Relation between management style and outcomes.International Public Management Journal. 2009;12:310-331
12. Edelenbos J.,Teisman G. R.Public-private partnerships on the edge of project and process management: Insights from Dutch practice: The Sijtwende spatial development project.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2008;26:614-626
13. Flyvbjerg B.,Skamris Holm M. K.,Buhl S. L.How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?.Transport Reviews. 2003;23:71-88
14. Gerrits L. M.,Verweij S.Critical realism as a meta-framework for understanding the relationships between complexity and qualitative comparative analysis.Journal of Critical Realism. 2013;12:166-182
15. Hertogh M. J. C. M.,Westerveld E.Playing with complexity: Management and organisation of large infrastructure projects. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam; 2010:
16. Klijn E. H.,Steijn A. J.,Edelenbos J.The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks.Public Administration. 2010;88:1063-1082
17. Koppenjan J. F. M.,Klijn E. H.Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London, England: Routledge; 2004:
18. Mackie J. L.The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1980:
19. Mantel S. J.,Meredith J. R.,Shafer S. M.,Sutton M. M.Core concepts of project management. New York, NY: Wiley; 2005:
20. Mistarihi A.,Hutchings K.,Shacklock A.Differing opinions do not spoil friendships: Managing public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects in Jordan.Public Administration and Development. 2013;33:371-388
21. Owens J.,Ahn J.,Shane J. S.,Strong K. C.,Gransberg D. D.Defining complex project management of large U.S. transportation projects: A comparative case study analysis.Public Works Management & Policy. 2012;17:170-188
22. Pawson R.,Tilley N.Realistic evaluation. London, England: sage; 1997:
23. Ragin C. C.The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1987:
24. Ragin C. C.What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Ragin C. C.Becker H. S., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992:217-226.
25. Ragin C. C.Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008:
26. Ragin C. C.Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Rihoux B.Ragin C. C., ed. London, England: Sage; 2009:87-122.
27. Ragin C. C.,Amoroso L. M.Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. London, England: Sage; 2011:
28. Rihoux B.,De Meur G.Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Rihoux B.Ragin C. C., ed. London, England: Sage; 2009:33-68.
29. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Rihoux B.Ragin C. C., ed. London, England: Sage; 2009:
30. Rihoux B.,Ragin C. C.,Yamasaki S.,Bol D.Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Rihoux B.Ragin C. C., ed. London, England: ; 2009:167-178.
31. Sanderson I.Evaluation in complex policy systems.Evaluation. 2000;6:433-454
32. Sayer A.Realism and social science. London, England: Sage; 2000:
33. Schneider C. Q.,Wagemann C.Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy sets.Comparative Sociology. 2010;9:397-418
34. Schneider C. Q.,Wagemann C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2012:
35. Schwartz-Shea P.,Yanow D.Interpretive research design: Concepts and process. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:
36. Teisman G. R.,Westerveld E.,Hertogh M. J. C. M.Managing complex governance systems: Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments. Teisman G. R.van Buuren M. W.Gerrits L. M., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009:56-75.
37. Thiem A.Clearly crisp, and not fuzzy: A reassessment of the (putative) pitfalls of multi-value QCA.Field Methods. 2013;25:197-207
38. Van Valkenburg M.,Nagelkerke M. C. J.Interweaving planning procedures for environmental impact assessment for high level infrastructure with public procurement procedures.Journal of Public Procurement. 2006;6:250-273
39. Verweij S.Management as system synchronization: The case of the Dutch A2 passageway Maastricht project.Emergence: Complexity & Organization. 2012;14:17-37
40. Verweij S.,Gerrits L. M.Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects.Evaluation. 2013;19:40-55
41. Verweij S.,Klijn E. H.,Edelenbos J.,Van Buuren M. W.What makes governance networks work? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 14 Dutch spatial planning projects.Public Administration. 2013;91:1035-1055
42. Vink M. P.,Van Vliet O.Not quite crisp, not yet fuzzy? Assessing the potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA.Field Methods. 2009;21:265-289
43. Vink M. P.,Van Vliet O.Potentials and pitfalls of multi-value QCA: Response to Thiem.Field Methods. 2013;25:208-213
44. Weick K. E.,Sutcliffe K. M.Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:
45. Weiss R. K.Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1994: