Critical realism as a meta-framework for understanding the relationships between complexity and qualitative comparative analysis

Journal of Critical Realism

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 166-182

  Gerrits, Lasse ^a,b   Verweij, Stefan ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complexity sciences; Critical realism; Philosophy of science; Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA); Research methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890210768     PISSN: 14767430     EISSN: 15725138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/rea.12.2.p663527490513071     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berg-Schlosser, D., G. de Meur, B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin 2009. 'Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach'. In Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, eds B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin, 1-18. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569.n1
2. Bhaskar, R. [1975] 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
3. Bhaskar, R. and M. Hartwig 2010. The Formation of Critical Realism: A Personal Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
4. Buijs, M. J., J. Eshuis and D. Byrne 2009. 'Approaches to researching complexity in public management'. In Managing Complex Governance Systems: Dynamics, Self-organization And Coevolution In Public Investments, eds G.R. Teisman, M.W. van Buuren and L.M. Gerrits, 37-55. New York: Routledge.
5. Byrne, D. S. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
6. Byrne, D. S. 2003. 'Complexity theory and planning theory: A necessary encounter'. Planning Theory 2(3): 171-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147309520323002
7. Byrne, D. S. 2005. 'Complexity, configurations and cases'. Theory, Culture and Society 22(5): 95-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057194
8. Byrne, D. S. 2009. 'Complex realist and configurational approaches to cases: a radical synthesis'. In The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods, eds D. S. Byrne and C. C. Ragin, 101-19. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249413.n6
9. Byrne, D. S. 2011a. Applying Social Science: The Role of Social Research in Politics, Policy and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.
10. Byrne, D. S. 2011b. 'Exploring organizational effectiveness: the value of complex realism as a frame of reference and systematic comparison as a method'. In The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management, eds P. Allen, S. Maguire and B. McKelvey, 131-41. London: Sage.
11. Callaghan, G. 2008. 'Evaluation and negotiated order: developing the application of complexity theory'. Evaluation 14(4): 399-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389008095485
12. Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Cilliers, P. 2001. 'Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems'. International Journal of Innovation Management 5(2): 135-47.
14. Cilliers, P. 2002. 'Why we cannot know complex things completely'. Emergence 4(1/2): 77-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM041&2-07
15. Cilliers, P. 2005a. 'Complexity, deconstruction and relativism'. Theory, Culture and Society 22(5): 255-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276405058052
16. Cilliers, P. 2005b. 'Knowledge, limits and boundaries'. Futures 37(7): 605-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.11.001
17. Easton, G. 2010. 'Critical realism in case study research'. Industrial Marketing Management 39(1): 118-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.06.004
18. Elder-Vass, D. 2005. 'Emergence and the realist account of cause'. Journal of Critical Realism 4(2): 315-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157251305774356667
19. Gerrits, L. M. 2012. Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the complexity of Public Decision-making. Litchfield Park: Emergent Publications.
20. Grofman, B. and C. Q. Schneider 2009. 'An introduction to crisp set QCA with a comparison to binary logistic regression'. Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 662-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912909338464
21. Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage.
22. Haynes, P. 2001. 'Complexity, quantification and the management of policy'. Social Issues 1(2), available at http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/ph.htm.
23. Koliba, C., A. Zia and H. Y. Lee 2011. 'Utilizing computer simulation models to manage complex governance networks'. The Innovation Journal 16(1): 1-26.
24. Losch, A. 2009. 'On the origins of critical realism'. Theology and Science 7(1): 85-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14746700802617105
25. Mackie, J. L. 1980. The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198246420.001.0001
26. Morçöl, G. 2001. 'What is complexity science? Postmodernist or postpositivist?'. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 3(1): 104-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM0301_07
27. Prigogine, I. 1997. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: The Free Press.
28. Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
29. Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
31. Ragin, C. C., D. Shulman, A. Weinberg and B. Gran 2003. 'Complexity, generality, and qualitative comparative analysis'. Field Methods 15(4): 323-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X03257689
32. Reed, M. and D. L. Harvey 1992. 'The new science and the old: complexity and realism in the social sciences'. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22(4): 353-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00224.x
33. Rescher, N. 1995. Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
34. Rescher, N. 1998. Complexity: A Philosophical Overview. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
35. Rihoux, B. and B. Lobe 2009. 'The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison'. In The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods, eds D. S. Byrne and C. C. Ragin, 222-42. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249413.n13
36. Rihoux, B. and C. C. Ragin, eds, 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. London: Sage.
37. Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.
38. Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
39. Schneider, C. Q. and C. Wagemann 2010. 'Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy sets'. Comparative Sociology 9(3): 397-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
40. Sibeon, R. 1999. 'Anti-reductionist sociology'. Sociology 33(2): 317-34.
41. Smithson, M. and J. Verkuilen 2006. Fuzzy Set Theory: Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
42. Uprichard, E. and D. S. Byrne 2006. 'Representing complex places: a narrative approach'. Environment and Planning A 38(4): 665-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a37333
43. Vis, B. 2007. 'States of welfare or states of workfare? Welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985-2002'. Policy and Politics 35(1): 102-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557307779657720
44. Wagenaar, H. 2006. 'Democracy and prostitution: deliberating the legalization of brothels in The Netherlands'. Administration and Society 38(2): 198-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399705285991
45. Williams, M. 2009. 'Social objects, causality and contingent realism'. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39(1): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00396.x
46. Williams, M. 2011. 'Contingent realism-abandoning necessity'. Social Epistemology 25(1): 37-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.534566
47. Wuisman, J. J. J. M. 2005. 'The logic of scientific discovery in critical realist social scientific research'. Journal of Critical Realism 4(2): 366-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157251305774356586