Measuring user acceptance of wearable symbiotic devices: Validation study across application scenarios

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8820, Issue , 2014, Pages 87-98

  Spagnolli, Anna ^a   Guardigli, Enrico ^a   Orso, Valeria ^a   Varotto, Alessandra ^a   Gamberini, Luciano ^a  

^a Department of General Psychology HIT Research Center   (Italy)

Author keywords

Symbiotic system; User acceptance; Wearable computers

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURVEYS; WEARABLE COMPUTERS;

APPLICATION SCENARIO; ATTITUDE TOWARD TECHNOLOGIES; FACILITATING CONDITIONS; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PSYCHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ATTACHMENT; SYMBIOTIC SYSTEM; USER ACCEPTANCE;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

EID: 84917690880     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13500-7_7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Buenaflor, C. B., Kim, H. C. K.: Six human factors to acceptability of wearable computers. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng. 8, 103-114 (2013).
2. Barfield, W., Mann, S., Baird, K., Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Cho, G.: Computational Clothing and Accessories. Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001).
3. Duval, S., Hoareau, C., Hashizume, H.: Humanistic needs as seeds. In: Wong, W. K., Guo, Z. X. (eds.) Smart Clothing, pp. 153-187. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2014).
4. Knight, J. F., Deen-Williams, D., Arvanitis, T. N., Baber, C., Sotiriou, S., Anastopoulou, S., Gargalakos, M.: Assessing the wearability of wearable computers. In: 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 75-82. IEEE Computer Society (2006).
5. Allanson, J., Fairclough, S. H.: A research agenda for physiological computing. Interact. Comput. 16, 857-878 (2004).
6. Dillon, A.: User acceptance of information technology. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London (2001).
7. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425-478 (2003).
8. Knight, J. F., Baber, C.: A tool to assess the comfort of wearable computers. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 47, 77-91 (2005).
9. Rico, J., Brewster, S: Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), pp. 887-896. ACM, New York (2010).
10. Britz, J.: Technology as a threat to privacy: ethical challenges and guidelines for the information professionals. Microcomput. Inf. Manage. 13, 175-193 (1996).
11. Tavani, H. T.: Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 15-28 (2004).
12. DeVries, M.: Pupils' Attitude Towards Technology (PATT)-USA Instrument (1988). http://www. iteaconnect. org/Conference/PATT/PATTSI/PATTSurveyInstrument. pdf. Accessed February 2014.
13. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186-204 (2000).
14. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Roundtree, R.: The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. J. Bus. Res. 56, 899-906 (2003).
15. Davis, F. D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985).
16. Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F.: Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, HICSS-32. p. 14. IEEE Computer Society (1999).
17. Kaplan, S., Okur, A.: The meaning and importance of clothing comfort: a case study for Turkey. J. Sens. Stud. 23, 688-706 (2008).
18. Perera, G., Holbrook, A., Thabane, L., Foster, G., Willison, D. J.: Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80, 94-101 (2011).
19. Ziefle, M., Rocker, C.: Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: a comparison of different implementation concepts. In: 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp. 1-6. IEEE Computer Society (2010).
20. Bergmann, J. H. M., McGregor, A. H.: Body-worn sensor design: what do patients and clinicians want? Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 2299-2312 (2011).
21. Bodine, K., Gemperle, F.: Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables. In 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 57-57. IEEE Computer Society (2003).
22. Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Freeman, J., Gamberini, L.: Symbiotic interaction: a critical definition and comparison to other human-computer paradigms. In: Proceedings of Symbiotic 2014: Third International Workshop on Symbiotic Interaction. Springer, London (2014).