Extending cost-benefit analysis for the sustainability impact of inter-urban Intelligent Transport Systems

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 50, Issue , 2015, Pages 167-177

  Kolosz, Ben ^a   Grant Muller, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Environmental impact assessment; Intelligent Transport Systems; Sustainability; Transport appraisal

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; ADVANCED VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; ROAD VEHICLES; ROADS AND STREETS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRAFFIC CONTROL; URBAN TRANSPORTATION; VEHICLE TO VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS;

ACTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTS; EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS; IMPLEMENTATION COST; IN-VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY; INTELLIGENT SPEED ADAPTATION; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS; TRANSPORT APPRAISALS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISCOUNT RATE; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; ROAD TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84917689384     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al-Kaisy A., Durbin C. Platooning on two-lane two-way highways: an empirical investigation. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2011, 16:329-339.
2. Almansa C., Martínez-Paz J.M. What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409(7):1305-1314.
3. Baum H., Geissler T. Assessing socio costs and socio benefits of AHS: methodological and empirical approach for the introduction of CHAUFFEUR in Germany and Japan. Paper number 2224 2000.
4. Baum H., Schulz W.H., Geissler T. Efficiency analysis of automated highway systems implementation strategies for Japan 1999, Cologne University, Cologne, Germany.
5. Bergenhem C., Huang Q., Benmimoun A., Robinson T. Challenges of platooning on public motorways. 17th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Busan, Korea 2010.
6. Carsten O.M.J., Tate F.N. Intelligent speed adaptation: accident savings and cost-benefit analysis. Accid Anal Prev 2005, 37(3):407-416.
7. Chase P., Avineri E. Maximizing motorway capacity through hard shoulder running: UK perspective. Open Transp J 2008, 2(1):7-18.
8. DECC Valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 2012, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London.
9. DECC Fossil fuel price projections 2013, Department of Energy & Climate Change, London.
10. DfT The application of traffic appraisal to trunk roads schemes. Design manual for roads and bridges 1997, 12. D.F. Transport, London.
11. DfT Transport appraisal guidance 3.3.5 - the greenhouse gases sub-objective 2012, TAG UNIT 3.3.5, London.
12. DfT Transport appraisal guidance 3.4.1: the accidents sub-objective 2012, Department for Transport, TAG Unit 3.4.1, London.
13. DfT Transport appraisal guidance 3.5.6: values of time and vehicle operating costs 2012, Department for Transport, TAG UNIT 3.5.6, London.
14. Fujiwara N. The merit of sectoral approaches in transitioning towards a global carbon market. CEPS Special Report 2010, Centre for European Policy Studies.
15. Hall R., Chin C. Vehicle sorting for platoon formation: impacts on highway entry and throughput. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 2005, 13(5):405-420.
16. Harvey S. The political and economic implications of ATT. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems, Paris, France 1994.
17. HMT Carbon price floor consultation: the government response 2011, HM Treasury, London.
18. Holt A., Pengelly I.J. ITS and renewable energy. Road transport information and control - RTIC 2008 and ITS United Kingdom Members' Conference 2008, IET.
19. Iseki H., Demisch A. Examining the linkages between electronic roadway tolling technologies and road pricing policy objectives. Res Transp Econ 2012, 36(1):121-132.
20. James N. MAESTRO guidelines for planning and evaluation of pilot and demonstration projects. DGVII project. Text available on CD-ROM from MAESTRO project manager 1999, 16. Transport and Travel Research Ltd.
21. Jeffery D. The potential benefits of route guidance 1981, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.
22. Kolosz B.W., Grant-Muller S.M., Djemame K. A macroscopic forecasting framework for estimating socioeconomic and environmental performance of intelligent transport highways. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2014, 15(2):723-736.
23. Kula E., Evans D. Dual discounting in cost-benefit analysis for environmental impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2011, 31(3):180-186.
24. Lai F., Carsten O. What benefit does Intelligent Speed Adaptation deliver: A close examination of its effect on vehicle speeds. Accid Anal Prev 2012, 48:4-9.
25. Lai F., Carsten O., Tate F. How much benefit does Intelligent Speed Adaptation deliver: An analysis of its potential contribution to safety and environment. Accid Anal Prev 2012, 48:63-72.
26. Lee D.B. Benefit-cost evaluation of traveler information: Seattle's Washington State Department of Transportation website. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2000, 1739(1):25-34.
27. Millard-Ball A. Transport in the global carbon market: baseline challenges with sectoral no-lose targets 2010.
28. Motyka V., James B. Concrete application of road information strategy. VMS in ILE-DE-FRANCE. Detailed quantitative evaluation and first glimpse of socio-economic benefits. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems, Paris, France 1994.
29. Nokkala M. Role of discount rates and pilot projects in its - project CBA. Res Transp Econ 2004, 8:113-125.
30. Pattinson J., Radia B., Kompfner P. ITS CITY pioneers - planning for intelligent transport in Europe's cities 1998, 1-8. E. Commision.
31. Perrett K., Stevens A., Wilkinson I., Masurel P.F. Review of the potential benefits of road transport telematics. TRL report 1996.
32. Psaraki V., Pagoni I., Schafer A. Techno-economic assessment of the potential of intelligent transport systems to reduce CO2 emissions. IET Intell Transp Syst 2012, 6(4):355-363.
33. Ran B., Kenny Lee K.Y., Dong H. Cost-benefit analysis on deployment of automated highway systems. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1997, 1588(1):137-144.
34. Schnarr T., Kitaska K. Evaluating ATMS from a business respective: Vancouver's traffic management program. Third World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Orlando, Florida 1996, ITS America, Olando, Florida.
35. Self S. M42 MM monitoring and evaluation: three year safety review 2011, Mott MacDonald, Highways Agency.
36. Sentance A. Developing transport infrastructure for the low carbon society. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2009, 25(3):391-410.
37. Shafiei E., Thorkelsson H., Ásgeirsson E.I., Davidsdottir B., Raberto M., Stefansson H. An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: a case study from Iceland. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 2012, 79(9):1638-1653.
38. Shibata M. The economic effect of in-car navigation system. Proceedings of IEEE 3rd Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Oslo, Norway 1992.
39. Simpson D., Walker J. Extending cost-benefit analysis for energy investment choices. Energy Policy 1987, 15(3):217-227.
40. Sisiopiku V.P., Sullivan A.J., Fadel G. Implementing active traffic management strategies in the US 2009, University Transportation Center for Alabama.
41. Stevens A. The applications and limitations of cost-benefit assessment (CBA) for intelligent transport systems. Res Transp Econ 2004, 8:91-111.
42. Sultan B. ATM monitoring and evaluation: 4 lane variable mandatory speed limits - 12 month report. ATM monitoring and evaluation 2009, V3. Highways Agency, Bristol.
43. Vaa T., Penttinen M., Spyropoulou I. Intelligent transport systems and effects on road traffic accidents: state of the art. IET Intell Transp Syst 2007, 1(2):81-88.
44. Vanholme B., Gruyer D., Lusetti B., Glaser S., Mammar S. Highly automated driving on highways based on legal safety. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2013, 14(1):333-347.
45. Yun I., Park B. Feasibility assessment of ITS deployment analysis system (IDAS) for ITS evaluations. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004. Proceedings. The 7th International IEEE Conference on 2004.
46. Zwaneveld P., Van Arem B. Traffic effects of automated vehicle guidance systems: a literature survey 1997.