National assessment of early biliary complications after liver transplantation: Economic implications

Transplantation

Volumn 98, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1226-1235

  Axelrod, David A ^a   Dzebisashvilli, Nino ^a   Lentine, Krista L ^b   Xiao, Huiling ^b   Schnitzler, Mark ^b   Tuttle Newhall, Janet E ^c   Segev, Dorry L ^d  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biliary complications; Cost; Donation after cardiac death; Economic analysis; Graft failure; Liver transplantation; Outcomes research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BRAIN DEATH; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEMALE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART DEATH; HEPATITIS B; HEPATITIS C; HUMAN; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; MORBIDITY; REGISTER; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; DEATH; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INSURANCE; LIVER FAILURE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; BRAIN DEATH; COHORT STUDIES; DEATH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; LIVER FAILURE; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MEDICARE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84917686086     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000197     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Axelrod DA, Gheorghian A, Schnitzler MA, et al. The economic implications of broader sharing of liver allografts. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 798.
2. Salvalaggio PR, Dzebisashvili N, MacLeod KE, et al. The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2011; 17: 233.
3. Axelrod DA, Schnitzler M, Salvalaggio PR, et al. The economic impact of the utilization of liver allografts with high donor risk index. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 990.
4. Seehofer D, Eurich D, Veltzke-Schlieker W, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: old problems and new challenges. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 253.
5. Zimmerman MA, Baker T, Goodrich NP, et al. Development, management, and resolution of biliary complications after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: a report from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study consortium. Liver Transp 2013; 19: 259.
6. Balderramo D, Cardenas A. The model for end-stage liver disease score and posttransplant biliary complications. Liver Transpl 2012; 18: 138.
7. Sibulesky L, Taner CB, Perry DK, et al. Bile duct stenting in liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2012; 25: e45.
8. Gastaca M. Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of incidence and risk factors. Trans plant Proc 2012; 44: 1545.
9. Jay CL, Lyuksemburg V, Ladner DP, et al. Ischemic cholangiopathy after controlled donation after cardiac death liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 259.
10. Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 817.
11. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto D. Biliary reconstruction, its complications and management of biliary complications after adult liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors and outcome. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 379.
12. Sibulesky L, Nguyen JH. Update on biliary strictures in liver transplants. Transplant Proc 2011; 43: 1760.
13. Welling TH, Heidt DG, Englesbe MJ, et al. Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 73.
14. Axelrod DA, Lentine KL, Xiao H, Dzebiashvilli N, Schnitzler MA, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Segev DL. National assessment of early biliary complications following liver transplantation: incidence and outcomes. Liver Transpl 2014; 20: 446.
15. Arain MA, Freeman ML. Advances in endoscopic management of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2013; 19: 492.
16. Englesbe MJ, Dimick J, Mathur A, et al. Who pays for biliary complications following liver transplant? A business case for quality improvement. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2978.
17. Jay CL, Skaro AI, Ladner DP, et al. Comparative effectiveness of donation after cardiac death versus donation after brain death liver transplantation: recognizing who can benefit. Liver Transpl 2012; 18: 630.
18. Broomhead RH, Patel S, Fernando B, et al. Resource implications of expanding the use of donation after circulatory determination of death in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2012; 18: 771.
19. van der Hilst CS, Ijtsma AJ, Bottema JT, et al. The price of donation after cardiac death in liver transplantation: a prospective cost-effectiveness study. Transpl Int 2013; 26: 411.
20. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, et al. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 531.
21. Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, et al. Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 1.
22. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: 336.
23. Decker MR, Greenblatt DY. Optimizing risk-adjusted outcome measures: a moving target. Invited commentary on: variability of NSQIP assessed surgical quality based on age and disease process. J Surg Res 2013; 1: 109.
24. Shahian DM. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: introduction. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(3 Suppl): S1.
25. Sotiropoulos GC, Sgourakis G, Radtke A, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation: T-tube or not T-tube? Systematic review and meta-analysis of results. Transplantation 2009; 87: 1672.
26. Hong JC, Venick R, Yersiz H, et al. Liver transplantation in children using organ donation after circulatory death: a case-control outcomes analysis of a 20-year experience in a single center. JAMA 2014; 149: 77.
27. Taner CB, Bulatao IG, Perry DK, et al. Asystole to cross-clamp period predicts development of biliary complications in liver transplantation using donation after cardiac death donors. Transpl Int 2012; 25: 838.
28. Gheorghian A, Schnitzler MA, Axelrod DA, et al. The implications of acute rejection and reduced allograft function on health care expenditures in contemporary US kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 94: 241.