Learning with computer games

Toys, Games, and Media

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 157-176

  Linderoth, Jonas ^a   Lindström, Berner ^a   Alexandersson, Mikael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917378602     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611000     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Anderson, C., & Dill, K. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772-790.
2. Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Avedon, E. M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). The study of games. New York: Wiley.
4. Brougere, G. (1999). Some elements relating to children's play and adult simulation/gaming. Simulation and Gaming, 30(2), 134-147.
5. Clements, D. H., & Meredith, J. S. (1992). Research on Logo: Effects and efficiency. The Logo Foundation. Accessed April 30, 2003 at http://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/pubs/papers/research_logo.html.
6. Dawes, L., & Dumbleton, T. (2002). Computer games in education project report. Accessed August 1, 2002 at http://www.becta.org.uk/technology/software/curriculum/computergames/report.html.
7. Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2001). The universe of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
8. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., & Smith, J. H. (2000). Den digitale leg-om børn og computerspil. Köpenhamn: Hans Reitzels Forlag a/s.
9. Erstad, O. (2002). Handlingsrummet som öppnar sig: Berättelser från ett multimedialt praxisfält. In R. Säljö & J. Linderoth (Eds.), Utm@ningar och efrestelser: IT och skolans lärkulturer. Stockholm: Prisma.
10. Gärdenfors, P. (1999). Media och berättande. Accessed September 29, 2002 at http://www.itis.gov.se/studiematerial/kopia/pdf/334.pdf.
11. Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill.
14. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
16. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
17. Juul, J. (1999). A clash between game and narrative. Unpublished master thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
18. Juul, J. (2001). Play time, event time, themability. Paper presented at the Computer Games and Digital Textualities, Copenhagen.
19. Koschmann, T. D. (1996a). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm: Computers, cognition, and work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Koschmann, T. D. (1996b). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. D. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Koschmann, T. D., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL II, carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Lave, J. (1999). Lärande, mästarlära, social praxis. In K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (Eds.), Mästarlära: Lärande som social praxis (pp. 49-65). Lund: Studentliteratur.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Linderoth, J., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Lindström, B. (2002). Electronic exaggerations and virtual worries: Mapping research of computer games relevant to the understanding of children's game play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 226-250.
25. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction, and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Philadelphia, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
26. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Millians, D. (1999). Simulations and young people: Developmental issues and game development. Simulation and Gaming, 30(2), 199-227.
28. Norman, D. (2002). Affordances and design. Accessed August 9, 2002 at http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/affordances-interactions.html.
29. Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22-30.
30. Poole, S. (2000). Trigger happy: The inner life of videogames. London: Fourth Estate.
31. Randel, J. M., & Morris, B. A. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation and Gaming, 23(3), 261-277.
32. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 144-166). London: Routledge.
33. Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken: Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm: Prisma.
34. Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. Game Studies, 2(1). Accessed November 24, 2003 at http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/.
35. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.