Media mixes and learning networks

Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 207-230

  Rice, Ronald E ^b   Hiltz, Starr Roxanne ^a   Spencer, David H ^b  

^a New Jersey Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917366471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611482     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning -a call for greater depth and breadth of research. information Systems Research , 12(12), 1-1.
2. Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Gupta, A., Sanocki, E., Li, F., & Leetiernan, S. (2002). Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia applied to on-demand education. Journal of Management Information Systems , 18(18), 4-117.
3. Berge, Z., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education , 15(15), 3-5.
4. Bozeman, D. (1993). Toward a limited rationality perspective of managerial media selection in organizations. In D.Moore (Ed.), Academy of Management best papers proceedings (pp. 278-282). 282.
5. Brail, S. (1996). The price of admission: Harassment and free speech in the wild, wild west. In I.L.Cherny & E.Weise (Eds.), Wired-women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 157-182). 182.
6. Bretz, R. (1970). A taxonomy of communication media. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
7. Bretz, R. (1983). Media for interactive communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Carlson, J., & Zmud, R. (1994). Channel expansion theory: A dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions. In D.Moore (Ed.), Best papers Proceedings of the Academy of Management (pp. 280-284). 284.
9. Chu, G., & Schramm, W. (1967). Learning from television: What the research says, Washington, DC: National Association of Educational Broadcasters.
10. Clark, R.E. (2000). Evaluating distance education: Strategies and cautions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1 (3), 16.
11. Clark, R.E. (Ed.). (2001a). Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
12. Clark, R.E. (2001b). Media are "mere vehicles": The opening argument. In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 1-12). 12.
13. Clark, R. (2001c). New directions: Evaluating distance education technologies. In R.E. Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 299-317). 317.
14. Clark, R., & Craig, T. (2001). What about multimedia effects on learning? In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 89-101). 101.
15. Clark, R.E., & Salomon, G. (2001). Why should we expect media to teach anyone anything? In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 37-70). 70.
16. Collms-Jarvis, L. (1996, May). Discriminatory messages in on-line discussion groups: The role of gender identity and social context. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
17. Culnan, M.J., & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.Jablin, L.Putnam, K. Roberts, & L.Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 420-443). 443.
18. Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science , 32(32), 5-554.
19. D'Ambra, J., & Rice, R.E. (1994). The equivocality of media richness: A multi-method approach to analyzing selection of voice mail for equivocal tasks. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , 37(37), 4-231.
20. Dawson, K. (1995). Comments on "Read me what it says on your screen...." Technology Studies , 2, 80-85.
21. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education , 10(10), 2-4.
22. Eastmond, D. (1993). Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Distance Education , 15(15), 1-129.
23. Ebben, M. (1993, October). Women on the net: An exploratory study of gender dynamics on the Soc.women computer network. Paper presented at the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender 16th Annual Conference, Tempe, AZ.
24. Frissen, V. (1992). Trapped in electronic cages? Gender and new information technologies in the public and private domain: An overview of research. Media, Culture & Society, 14,31-39.
25. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal , 36(36), 5-921.
26. Gibson, C. (1996). Toward emerging technologies and distributed learning: Challenges and change. American Journal of Distance Education , 10(10), 2-47.
27. Goodman, N. (1968). Language of art.Indianapolis, IN: Hackett
28. Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education , 11(11), 3-8.
29. Hackman, M, & Walker, K. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education , 39(39), 3-196.
30. Harasim, L. (Ed.). (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
31. Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society , 2(2), 2-195.
32. Hilgenberg, C., & Tolone, N. (2000). Student perceptions of satisfaction and opportunities for critical thinking in distance education by interactive video. American Journal of Distance Education , 14(14), 3-59.
33. Hiltz, S.R. (1986). The "vitrual classroom": Using comptuer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication , 36(36), 2-95.
34. Hiltz, S.R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.
36. Hough, R., & Panko, R. (1977). Teleconferencing systems: A state of the art survey and preliminary analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
37. Keegan, D. (1986). The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm.
38. Kelsey, K.D. (2000). Participant interaction in a course delivered by interactive compressed video technology. American Journal of Distance Education , 14(14), 1-63.
39. Kim, E., Hiltz, S.R., Scher, J., & Turoff, M. (2003, August). Multimedia diversification of the ALN learning environment. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL.
40. Kozma, R. (2001a). Kozma reframes and extends his counter argument. In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence (pp. 179-198). 198.
41. Kozma, R. (2001b). Learning with media. In R.E.Clark (Ed.), Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
42. Lantz, A. (2001). Meetings in a distributed group of experts: Comparing face-to-face, chat and collaborative virtual environments. Behaviour & Information Technology , 20(20), 2-111.
43. Lea, M. (1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computermediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology , 10(10), 1-153.
44. Leuthold, J.H. (1999). Is computer-based learning right for everyone? In Proceedings of 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (CD-Rom ed.). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
45. Lieberman, D. (2001). Using interactive media in communication campaigns for children and adolescents. In R.E.Rice & C.K.Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 373-388). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Lombard, M., Ditton, T., & Reich, R. (1997). The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports, 10 (1) 95-106.
47. Machtmes, K., & Asher, J. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education , 14(14), 1-27.
48. Markus, M.L. (1990). Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. In J.Fulk & C.Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194-218). 218.
49. Matarazzo, G., & Selen, G. (2000). The value of video in work at a distance: Addition or distraction? Behavior & Information Technology , 19(19), 5-339.
50. McKenney, J., Zack, M., & Doherty, V. (1992). Complementary communication media: A comparison of electronic mail and face-to-face communication in a programming team. In N.N.R.Eccles (Ed.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 262-287). 287.
51. Monaghan, P., & Stenning, K. (1998, August). Effects of representation modality and thinking style on learning to solve reasoning problems. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, WI.
52. Moore, A., & Jovanis, P. (1988). Modeling media choices in business organizations: Implications for analyzing telecommunications-transportation interactions. Transportation Research, 22A, 257-273.
53. Murphy, K.L., & Collins, M.P. (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats. FirstMonday, 2(11) Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_11/murphy
54. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (1997). Interactions in audiographics teaching and learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education , 11(11), 1-34.
55. Olson, D. (1976). Towards a theory of instructional means. Educational Psychologist, 12, 14-35.
56. Orr, B. (1997). A Significant Difference. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://teleeducation.nb.ca/english/article.cfm
57. Paivio, A. (1985). Mental representations: A dual approach: New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Peters, O. (1988). Distance teaching and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline. In D.Sewart, D.Keegan, & B.Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 95-113). 113.
59. Quinn, C., Mehan, H., Levin, J., & Black, S. (1983). Real education in non-real time: The use of electronic message systems for instruction. Instructional Science , 11, 313-327.
60. Reynolds, P.A., & Mason, R. (2002). On-line video media for continuing professional development in dentistry. Computers and Education , 39(1)65-98.
61. Rice, R.E. (1982). Communication networking in computer conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. In M.Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 925-944). 944.
62. Rice, R.E. (1984). Mediated group communication. In R.E.Rice et al. (Eds.), The new media: Communication, research and technology (pp. 129-154). 154.
63. Rice, R.E. (1987). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication , 37(37), 4-65.
64. Rice, R.E. (1990). Computer-mediated communication system network data. Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 32(6)627-647.
65. Rice, R.E. (1992). Contexts of research on organizational computer-mediated communication: A recursive review. In M.Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 113-144). 144.
66. Rice, R.E. (1993a). Artifacts, freedoms, paradoxes and inquiries: Some ways new media challenge traditional mass media and interpersonal effects paradigms. MultiMedia Review/Virtual Reality World , 4(2)30-35.
67. Rice, R.E. (1993b). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research , 19(4)451-484.
68. Rice, R.E. (1999). What's new about new media? Artifacts and paradoxes. New Media and Society , 1(1), 1-24.
69. Rice, R.E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes towards new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly , 36, 219-244.
70. Rice, R.E., & Case, D. (1983). Computer-based messaging in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication , 33(1)131-152.
71. Rice, R.E., D'Ambra, J., & More, E. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison of organizational media evaluation and choice. Journal of Communication , 48(3)3-26.
72. Rice, R.E., & Gattiker, U. (2000). New media and organizational structuring. In F.Jablin & L.Putnam (Eds.), New handbook of organizational communication (pp. 544-581). 581.
73. Rice, R.E., Grant, A., Schmitz, J., & Torobin, J. (1990). Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging. Social Networks , 12(12), 1-27.
74. Rice, R.E., Hart, P., Torobin, J., Shook, D., Tyler, J., Svenning, L., et al (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science , 3(3), 4-475.
75. Rice, R.E., Hughes, D., & Love, G. (1989). Usage and outcomes of electronic messaging at an R&D organization: Situational constraints, job level, and media awareness. Office: Technology and People , 5(5), 2-141.
76. Rice, R.E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socio-emotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research , 14(14), 1-85.
77. Rovai, A.A.P. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1)Retrieved October 15, 2003, from www.aln.org/publications /jaln/v6nl_rovai.asp
78. Rumble, G. (2001). Re-inventing distance education, 1971-2001. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20 (1/2)31-43.
79. Russell, T. (1999). The no significance difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill: North Carolina State University Office of Instructional Telecommunications.
80. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81. Salomon, G. (1981). Communication and education. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
82. Schramm, W. (1977). Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83. Selfe, C., & Meyer, P. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication , 8(2)163-192.
84. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
85. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Hanson, D, (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion. American Journal of Distance Education , 13(1)60-75.
86. Sitkin, S., Sutcliffe, K., & Barrios-Choplin, J. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research , 18(4)563-598.
87. Smith, P.L., & Dillon, C.L. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. American Journal of Distance Education , 13(2)6-23.
88. Sparks, C., & van Zoonen, L. (1992). Gender and technology. Media, Culture and Society , 14, 5-7.
89. Spencer, D. (2002). A field study of the use of synchronous computer-mediated communication in asynchronous learning networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
90. Spencer, D., & Hiltz, S.R. (2003). A field study of use of synchronous chat in online courses. In 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom ed.). Washington DC:: IEEE Computer Society.
91. Steeples, C. (2002). Voice annotation of multimedia artifacts: Reflective learning in distributed professional communities. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD Rom-ed.). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
92. Suthers, D., Hundhausen, C., & Giradeau, L. (2003). Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education , 41(4)335-351.
93. Swan, K. (2002). Building communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2 (1), 23-49
94. Thoennessen, M., Kashy, E., Tsai, Y, & Davis, N.E. (1999). Impact of asynchronous learning networks in large lecture classes. Group Decision and Negotiation , 8(5)371-384.
95. Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R.H., & Daft, R.L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research , 14(5)553-575.
96. Valacich, J., Paranka, D., George, J., & Nunamaker, J. (1993). Communication concurrency and the new media. Communication Research , 20(20), 2-249.
97. Veerman, A.L., Andriessen, J.E.B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education , 34, 269-290.
98. Walther, J. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research , 19(19), 1-52.
99. Walther, J.B., Slovacek, C.L., & Tidwell, L.C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research , 28(28), 1-105.
100. Witfelt, C., Philipsen, P.E., & Kaiser, B. (2002). Chat as media in exams. Education and Information Technologies , 7(7), 4-343.
101. Zmud, R., Lind, M., & Young, F. (1990). An attribute space for organizational communication channels. Information Systems Research , 1(1), 4-440.