4-month evaluation of a learner-controlled reading tutor that listens

The Path of Speech Technologies in Computer Assisted Language Learning: From Research Toward Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 201-219

  Mostow, Jack ^a   Aist, Gregory ^b   Huang, Cathy ^c   Junker, Brian ^c   Kennedy, Rebecca ^c   Lan, Hua ^c   Latimer, DeWitt ^c   O'Connor, Rollanda ^c   Tassone, Regina ^c   Wierman, Adam ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917275514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203937761     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Aist, G. S., & Mostow. J. (1997). Adapting human tutorial interventions for a reading tutor that listens: Using continuous speech recognition in interactive educational multimedia. Proceedings of CALL'97 Conference on Multimedia, Exeter, England.
2. Banerjee, S., Beck, J., & Mostow, J. (2003). Evaluating the effect of predicting oral reading miscues. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH 2003, Geneva. [http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/pdfs/Eurospeech2003_Evaluating_predicted_miscues.pdf]
3. Becker, H.J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. Future of Children, 10, 44-75.
4. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264-274.
5. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-Based Measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
6. Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 35-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Huang, X. D., Alleva, F, Hon, H. W., Hwang, M. Y., Lee, K. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1993). The SPHINX-II speech recognition system: An overview. Computer Speech and Language, 7(2), 137-148.
8. Mostow, J. (2004). Advances in children's speech recognition within an interactive literacy tutor. In A. Hagen, B. Pellom, S. van Vuuren, & R. Cole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference 2004, North American Chapter of Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, MA.
9. Mostow, J., & Aist, G. S. (1997). When speech input is not an afterthought: A reading tutor that listens. AAAI Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, Banff.
10. Mostow, J., & Aist, G. S. (1999). Giving help and praise in a reading tutor with imperfect listening-because automated speech recognition means never being able to say you're certain. CALICO Journal 16(3), 407-424. Special issue (M. Holland, (Ed.), Tutors that Listen: Speech recognition for Language Learning.
11. Mostow, J., Roth, S., Hauptmann, A. G., & Kane, M. (1994). A prototype reading coach that listens. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle, (Outstanding Paper).
12. O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
13. Tam, Y.-C., Beck, J., Mostow, J., & Banerjee, S. (2003). Training a confidence measure for a reading tutor that listens. Proceedings of EUROSPEECH 2003. Geneva. [Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/pdfs/cm_euro03.ps]
14. van Berge Henegouwen M., van Driel H., & Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite, D. (1999). A patient diary as a tool to improve medicine compliance. Pharmacy World and Science, 21(1), 21-4.
15. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 55014. Available at http://www.agsnet.com.
16. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 5-30.
17. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology use in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-047.