The Relationship Between Student Evaluations of Teaching and Faculty Evaluations

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 189-192

  Read, William J ^a   Rama, Dasaratha V ^b   Raghunandan, K ^b  

^a BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917252480     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320109601309     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). 1990. AECC urges priority for teaching in higher education, Bain-bridge Island, WA: AECC.
2. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). 1993. Evaluating and rewarding effective teaching, Issues Statement No. 5 Bainbridge Island, WA: AECC.
3. Calderon, T. G., Green, B. P., and Reider, B. P., Extent of use of multiple information sources in assessing accounting faculty teaching performance. Proceedings of the 1994 Ohio Regional Meeting. Akron.
4. Calderon, T. G., Gabbin, A. L., and Green, B. P., 1996. Report of the Committee on Promoting and Evaluating Effective Teaching, Harrison, VA: Center for Research in Accounting Education, James Madison University.
5. Calderon, T. G., and Green, B. P., 1997. Use of multiple information types in assessing accounting faculty teaching performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 15 (2): 221–239.
6. Cook, J. W., 1989. Practical actions for practical education. The CPA Journal, 59 (3): 6–8.
7. Green, B. P., Calderon, T. G., and Reider, B. P., 1998. A content analysis of teaching evaluation instruments used in accounting departments. Issues in Accounting Education, February: 15–30.
8. Hasselback, J., 1997. Accounting faculty directory, New York: Prentice Hall.
9. Hutchings, P., Summer 1998. The Carnegie Teaching Academy: An overview in News, Summer, 1The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
10. Martin, J. R., 1998. Evaluating faculty based on student opinions: Problems, implications, and recommendations from Deming's theory of management persepctive. Issues in Accounting Education, November: 1079–1094.
11. Schultz, J. J., Jr., Meade, J. A., and Khurana, I., 1989. The changing roles of teaching, research, and service in the promotion and tenure decisions of accounting faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, Spring: 109–119.
12. Wallace, W. A., 1990. One educator's view of how to respond to the challenges faced by higher education in business. Issues in Accounting Education, Fall: 302–306.
13. Wallace, J. J., and Wallace, W. A., 1998. Why the costs of student evaluations have long since exceeded their value. Issues in Accounting Education, May: 443–448.
14. Weis, W. L., 1990. What's going on in business schools+. Management Accounting, 71 (11): 49–52.