The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data

Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 123-145

  Bardovi Harlig, Kathleen ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917126422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610607     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Andersen, R.W. (1984). The one-to-one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34, 77-95.
2. Andersen, R.W. (1990). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In B.VanPatten & J.F.Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition-foreign language learning (pp. 45-78). Clevedon, England:Multilingual Matters.
3. Andersen, R.W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K.Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression & regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological, & linguistic perspectives (pp. 309-339). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Azar, B.S. (1985). Fundamentals of English grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992a). The relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 253-278.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992b). The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. IRAL, 30, 299-320.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning, 44, 243-282.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
9. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002). A new starting point? Investigating formulaic use and input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 189-198.
10. Berretta, M. (1990). Il futuro in italiano L2. Quarderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica e Letterature Comparate (Università di Bergamo), 6, 147-188.
11. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
12. Broen, P.A., & Santema, S.A. (1983). Children's comprehension of six verb-tense forms. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16, 85-97.
13. Bybee, J.L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
17. Coates, J. (1987). Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological Society (pp. 111-131). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
18. Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
19. Dahl, Ö. (2000). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.
20. Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Ellis, N.C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-216.
22. Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
23. Fleischman, S. (1982). The future in thought and language. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
24. Fletcher, P. (1979). The development of the verb phrase. In P.Fletcher & M.Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 261-284). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Gee, J., & Savasir, I. (1985). On the use of will and gonna: Toward a description of Activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes, 8, 143-175.
26. Giacalone Ramat, A. (1992). Grammaticalization processes in the area of temporal and modal relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 297-322.
27. Klein, W. (1995). The acquisition of English. In R.Dietrich, W.Klein, & C.Noyau (Eds.), The acquisition of temporality in a second language (pp. 31-70). Amsterdam:Benjamins.
28. Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues related to the monitor model. In H.Brown, C.Yorio, & R.Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 144-158). Washington, DC: TESOL.
29. Leech, G.N. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
30. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. London: Cambridge University Press.
31. Meisel, J. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C.W.Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 206-224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
32. Moses, J. (2002). The expression of futurity by English-speaking learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
33. O'Neill, R., Anger, L., & Davy, K. (1981). AKL: Beginning. London: Longman.
34. O'Neill, R., Kingsbury, R., Yeadon, T., & Cornelius, E.T., Jr. (1978). AKL: Intermediate. London: Longman.
35. Palmer, F.R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Pawłowska, M. (1999). A parallel development in the history and acquisition of be going to in English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, XXXIV, 201-210.
37. Perkins, M.R. (1983). Modal expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
39. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development:Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41. Salsbury, T. (2000). The grammaticalization of unreal conditionals: A longitudinal study of L2 English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
42. Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21-41.
43. Wiberg, E. (2002). Information structure in dialogic future plans: A study of Italian native speakers and Swedish preadvanced and advanced learners of Italian. In R.Salaberry & Y.Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 285-321). Amsterdam: Benjamins.