On shell structure

On Shell Structure

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-496

  Larson, Richard K ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917036311     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203429204     Document Type: Book

References (515)

1. Allerton, D. (1978) “Generating Indirect Objects in English,” Journal of Linguistics 14: 21–33.
2. Aoun, J. and D. Sportiche (1983) “The Formal Theory of Government,” The Linguistic Review 2: 211–236.
3. Bach, E. (1979) “Control in Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515–531.
4. Baker, M. (1985) Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
5. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.
6. Bell, S. (1983) “Advancements and Ascensions in Cebuano,” in D. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in Relational Grammar I. (pp. 143–218) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Belletti, A. and B. Levin (1985) “On VP-PP Constructions,” unpublished manuscript MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8. Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi (1988) “Psych-verbs and Theta-theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.
9. Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10. Carrier-Duncan, J. (1985) “Linking of Thematic Roles in Derivational Word Formation,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 1–34.
11. Chomsky, N. (1955/1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Chomsky, N. (1970) “Remarks on Nominalization,” in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. (pp. 184–221) Waltham, MA: Ginn.
13. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
14. Chomsky, N. (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, N. (1986a) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Chomsky, N (l986b) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
17. Christensen, K. (1982) “On Multiple Filler-Gap Constructions in Norwegian,” in E. Engdahl and E. Ejerhed, eds., Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. (pp. 77–98) Umea Studies in the Humanities 43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
18. Christensen, K. (1987) “Modem Norwegian Ingen and the Ghost of an Old Norse Particle,” in R.D.S. Allen and M.P. Barnes, eds., Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers if Scandinavian Studies in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (pp. 1–17). London: University College London.
19. Chung, S. (1976) “An Object-Creating Rule in Bahasa Indonesia,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 41–87.
20. Culicover, P. (1982) Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
21. Czepluch, H. (1982) “Case Theory and the Dative Construction,” The Linguistic Review 2: 1–38.
22. Dowty, D. (1978) “ Rules in a Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 393–426.
23. Dowty, D. (1979) “Dative ‘Movement’ and Thomason’s Extensions of Montague Grammar,” in S. Davis and M. Mithun, eds., Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar. (pp. 153–222) Austin: University of Texas Press.
24. Dowty, D. (1982) “Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar,” in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum, eds., The Nature of Syntactic Representation. (pp. 79–130) Dordrecht: Reidel.
25. Dryer, M. (1987) “On Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative,” Language 62: 808–845.
26. Emonds, J. (1972) “Evidence That Indirect Object Movement is a Structure-Preserving Rule,” Foundations of Language 8: 546–561.
27. Engdahl, E. (1983) “Parasitic Gaps,” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34.
28. Feldman, H. (1978) “Passivizing on Datives in Greek,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 499–502.
29. Fillmore, C. (1965) Indirect Objects and the Ordering of Transformations. Mouton Freidin, R. and
30. L. Babby (1984) “On the Interaction of Lexical and Syntactic Properties: Case Structure in On the Double Object Construction 189 Russian,” in Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 6. (pp. 71–104) Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
31. Gary, J. and E. Keenan (1977) “On Collapsing Grammatical Relations in Universal Grammar,” in P. Cole and J. Sadock, eds., Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations. New York: (pp. 83–120), Academic Press.
32. Giorgi, A. (1984) “Toward a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors,” The Linguistic Review 3: 307–361.
33. Giorgi, A. (1987) “The Notion of Complete Functional Complex: Some Evidence from Italian,” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 511–518.
34. Givón, T. (1984) “Direct Object and Dative Shifting: Semantic and Pragmatic Case,” in F. Plank, ed., Objects. (pp. 151–182), London: Academic Press.
35. Green, G. (1974) Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
36. Haegeman, L. and H. van Riemsdijk (1986) “Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417–466.
37. Hale, K. (1973) “Person Marking in Walbiri,” in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle. (pp. 308–344) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
38. Hawkins, R. (1981) “On ‘Generating Indirect Objects in English’: A Reply to Allerton,” Journal of Linguistics 17: 1–9.
39. Herslund, M. (1986) “The Double Object Construction in Danish,” in L. Hellan and K. Christensen, eds., Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. (pp. 125–147) Dordrecht: Reidel.
40. Jacobson, P. (1983) “Grammatical Relations,” paper presented at the 1983 Winter meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
41. Jacobson, P. (1987) “Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituents,” in G. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency. (pp. 27–69) New York: Academic Press, New York.
42. Jaeggli, O. (1986) “Passive,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.
43. Jelinek, E. (1984) “Empty Categories, Case and Configurationality,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76.
44. Johns, A. (1984) “Dative ‘Movement’ in Eskimo,” in D. Testen, V. Mishra, and J. Drogo, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. (pp. 162–172) Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
45. Johnson, K. (1987) “Against the Notion, ‘SUBJECT,’” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 354–361.
46. Kayne, R. (1975) French Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Kayne, R. (1981) “On Certain Differences between French and English,” Linguistic Inquiry 12: 349–371.
48. Kayne, R. (l983a) “Datives in French and English,” in Connectedness and Binary Branching. (pp. 193–202) Dordrecht: Foris.
49. Keenan, E. (1975) “Some Universals of Passive in Relational Grammar,” in R. Grossman, L. J. San, and T. Vance, eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. (pp. 340–352) Chicago: University of Chicago
50. Kimenyi, A. (1980) A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. Kitagawa, Y. (1986) Subjects in Japanese and English, doctoral thesis. University of Massachusetts- Amherst.
52. Koopman, H. (1986) “On Deriving Deep and Surface Order,” in C. Jones and P. Sells, eds., Papers from the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of NELS. (pp. 220–235) Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
53. Kuroda, Y. (1988) “Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese,” Linquisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47.
54. Larson, R. K. (1991) “Promise and the Theory of Control,” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 103–139.
55. Larson, R. K. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising,” Lexicon Project Working Papers No, 27. Center for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
56. Marantz, A. (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. McConnell-Ginet, S. (1982) “Adverbs and Logical Form,” Language 58: 144–184
58. Montague, R. (1974) “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English,” in R. Thomason, ed., Formal Philosophy. (pp. 247–270) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59. Oehrle, R. (1976) The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
60. Oehrle, R. (1983) “The Inaccessibility of the Inner NP: Corrections and Speculations,” Linguistic Analysis 12: 159–171.
61. Perlmutter, D. (1978) “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis,” in Jeri J. Jaeger, ed., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (pp. 157–190). Berkeley: University of California.
62. Perlmutter, D., ed. (1983) Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Perlmutter, D. and P. Postal (1983) “Some Proposed Laws of Basic Clause Structure,” in D. Perlmutter, ed., Studies in Relational Grammar 1. (pp. 81–128) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Perlmutter, D. and C. Rosen, eds. (1984) Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Pica, P. (1987) “On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle,” in J. McDonough and B. Plunkett, eds., Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, (pp. 483–499). Amherst, MA: GLSA. University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
66. Pinker, S. (1984) Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Reinhart, T. (1979) “Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules,” in F. Guenthner and S. Schmidt, eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language. (pp.107–130) Dordrecht: Reidel.
68. Rizzi, L. (1986) “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.
69. Roberts, I. (1985) “Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58.
70. Rouveret, A. and J.-R. Vergnaud (1980) “Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations,” Linguistic Inquiry 11, 97–202.
71. Sag,I., G. Gazdar, T. Wasow, and S. Weisler (1985) “Coordination and How to Distinguish Categories,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 117–171.
72. Shimizu, M. (1975) “Relational Grammar and Promotion Rules in Japanese,” in R. Grossman, L. J. San, and T. Vance, eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. (pp. 529–535), University of Chicago.
73. Speas, M. and N. Fukui (1986) “Specifiers and Projection,” unpublished manuscript MIT, Cambridge, MA.
74. Sportiche, D. (1988) “A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.
75. Sproat, R. (1985) “Welsh Syntax and VSO Structure,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 173–216.
76. Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
77. Tenny, C. (1987) Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
78. Travis, L. (1985) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
79. Whitney, R. (1983) “The Syntactic Unity of Wh-Movement and Complex NP Shift,” Linguistic Analysis 10: 299–319.
80. Ziv, Y. and G. Scheintuch (1979) “Indirect Objects Reconsidered,” in P. Clyne, W. Hanks, and C. Hofbauer, eds., Proceedings of the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. (pp. 390–403), University of Chicago.
81. Zubizarreta, M.-L. (1985) “The Relation between Morphophonology and Morphosyntax,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 247–289.
82. Abbott, B. (1976) “Right Node Raising as a Test for Constituenthood,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 639–642.
83. Anderson, S. (1971) “On the Role of Deep Structure in Semantic Interpretation,” Foundations of Language 7: 387–396.
84. Aoun, J. and Y.-H. A. Li (1989) “Scope and Constituency,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141–172.
85. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation. Chicago:.University of Chicago Press.
86. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.
87. Belletti, A. and L. Rizzi (1988) “Psych-Verbs and ?-Theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.
88. Bowers, J. (1981) The Theory of Grammatical Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
89. Carlson, G. (1984) “Thematic Roles and Their Role in Semantic Interpretation,” Linguistics 22: 259–279.
90. Chomsky, N, (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris
91. Chomsky, N, (1986a) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
92. Chomsky, N, (1986b) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
93. Chomsky, N, (1989) “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation,” in I. Laka and A. Mahajan, eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10. (pp. 43–74) Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
94. Cohen, R. (1987) “Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse,” Computational Linguistics 13: 11–24.
95. Collins, C. (1988) “Conjunction Adverbs,” unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
96. Contreras, H. (1984) “A Note on Parasitic Gaps,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 698–701.
97. Davidson, D. (1967) “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” in N. Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action. (pp. 81–120) Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
98. Dowty, D. (1988) “Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction,” in R. Oehrle, E. Bach, and D. Wheeler, eds., Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures. (pp. 153–197) Dordrecht: Reidel.
99. Dryer, M. (1987) “On Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative,” Language 62: 808–845.
100. Emonds, J. (1987) “The Invisible Category Principle,” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 613–632.
101. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1987) “Right Node Raising,” in M. Browning, E. Czaykowski-Higgins, and E. Ritter,eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 9. (pp. pp. 105–117) Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
102. Grimshaw, J. (1989) “Getting the Dative Alternation,” in I. Laka and A. Mahajan, eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10. (pp. 113–122) Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
103. Gropen, J., S. Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg, and R. Wilson (1989) “The Learnability and Acquisition of the English Dative Alternation,” Language 65: 203–257.
104. Grosu, A. (1976) “A Note on Subject Raising to Object and Right Node Raising,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 642–645.
105. Grosz, B. (1978) “Discourse Knowledge,” in D. Walker, ed., Understanding Spoken Language (pp. 228–345) New York: North-Holland.
106. Grosz, B. (1981) “Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues,” in A. Joshi, B. L. Webber, and I. A. Sag, eds., Elements of Discourse Understanding, (pp. 85–105) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 228 On Shell Structure
107. Grosz, B., M. Pollack, and C. Sidner (1989) “Discourse,” in M. Posner, ed., Foundations of Cognitive Science. (pp. 437–468) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner (1986) “Attention, Intensions, and the Structure of Discourse,” Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.
109. Guindon, R., P. Sladsky, H. Brunner, and J. Conner (1986) “The Structure of User-Adviser Dialogues:Is There Method in Their Madne” Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (pp. 224–230). New York: Columbia University.
110. Hale, K. (1986) “Notes on World View and Semantic Categories: Some Warlpiri Examples,” in P. Muysken and H. van Riemsdijk, eds., Features and Projection. (pp. 233–254) Dordrecht: Foris.
111. Hale, K. (1989) “Subject Obviation, Switch Reference, and Control,” paper presented at the MIT Workshop on Control, MIT, March 1989.
112. Hegarty, M. (1989) “Verb Raising, Adverbs, and Double Objects,” unpublished manuscript MIT,Cambridge, MA.
113. Heim, I. (1982) The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation,University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
114. Heim, I., H. Lasnik, and R. May (1989) “Reciprocity and Plurality,” unpublished manuscript University of California, Irvine.
115. Hoeksema, J. (1987) “The Status of Small Clauses in Dutch and English,” unpublished manuscript University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
116. Hornstein, N. and A. Weinberg (1990) “The Necessity of LF,” The Linguistic Review 7: 129–168.
117. Huang, C.-T. J. (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation,MIT, Cambridge MA.
118. Hudson, R. (1982) “Incomplete Conjuncts,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 547–550.
119. Hudson, R. (1989) “Gapping and Grammatical Relations,” Journal of Linguistics 25: 57–94.
120. Jackendoff, R. (1971) “Gapping and Related Rules,” Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.
121. Jackendoff, R. (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Jackendoff, R. (1990) “On Larson’s Analysis of the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 427–456.
123. Jacobson, P. (1987) “Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituents,”in G. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency. (pp. 27–69)New York: Academic Press.
124. Johns, A. (1984) “Dative ‘Movement’ in Eskimo,” in D. Testen, V. Mishra, and J. Drogo, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. (pp. 162–172) Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society,University of Chicago.
125. Kamp, H. (1981) “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation,” in J. Groenendijk, T. M. V.Janssen, and M. Stokhof, eds., Truth, Interpretation and Information. (pp. 277–322) Dordrecht:Foris.
126. Kayne, R. (1983) “Datives in English and French,” in Connectedness and Binary Branching. (pp.193–202) Dordrecht: Foris.
127. Kiser, D. (1943) Corpus Jurus Secundum. Vol. 38, Brooklyn, NY: American Law Book Co.
128. Larson, R. (1985) “Bare-NP Adverbs,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 595–621.
129. Larson, R. (1987) ‘“Missing Prepositions’ and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses,” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 239–266.
130. Larson, R. (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
131. Larson, R. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising,” MIT Lexicon Project working Papers 27, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
132. Larson, R. and R. May (1990) “Antecedent Containment or Vacuous Movement: Reply to Baltin,”Linguistic Inquiry 21: 103–122.
133. Lebeaux, D. (1983) “A Distributional Difference between Reciprocals and Reflexives,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 423–440.
134. Levine, R. (1985) “Right Node (Non-)Raising,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 492–497.
135. Linebarger, M. (1987) “Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation,” Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–387.
136. May, R. (1985) Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
137. McCawley, J. (1982) “Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.
138. McCawley, J. (1988) “Adverbial NPs,” Language 64: 583–590.
139. McCloskey, J. (1986) “Right Node Raising and Preposition Stranding,” Linguistic Inquiry 17:183–186.
140. McNulty, J. (1978) Federal Taxation of Individuals in a Nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
141. Neijt, A. (1979) Gapping. Dordrecht: Foris
142. Oehrle, R. (1976) The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Doctoral dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.
143. Parsons, T. (1985) “Underlying Events in the Logical Analysis of English,” in E. LePore and B. Mc-Laughlin, eds., Actions and Events. (pp. 235–267) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
144. Parsons, T. (1991) Events in the Semantics of English. (pp.235–267) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
145. Partee, B. (1965) Subject and Object in Modern English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,MA (Published as Subject and Object in Modern English, New York: Garland 1979.)
146. Pinker, S. (1989) The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
147. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989) “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP,” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
148. Randall, J. (1987) Indirect Positive Evidence: Overturning Generalizations in Language Acquisition,unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
149. Reinhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
150. Research Institute of America, Inc. (1978) Federal Tax Coordinator 2d. New York: Research Institute of America, Inc.
151. Ross, J. R. (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. (Published as Infinite Syntax, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.)
152. Russell, B. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics. New York: Norton
153. Sag, I. (1976) Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
154. Sag, I., G. Gazdar, T. Wasow, and S. Weisler (1985) “Coordination and How to Distinguish Categories,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 117–171.
155. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1988) “Double Objects and Small Clauses,” unpublished manuscript, University of Southern California Los Angeles, California.
156. Solan, L. (1983) Pronominal Reference. Dordrecht: Reidel.
157. Stillings, J. (1975) “The Formulation of Gapping in English as Evidence for Variable Types in Syntactic Transformations,” Linguistic Analysis 1: 247–273.
158. Tenny, C. (1987) Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,MA.
159. Williams, E. (1978) “Across-the-Board Rule Application,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
160. Bach, E. (1979) “Control in Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515–531.
161. Bach, E. and B. Partee (1980) “Anaphora and Semantic Structure,” in J. Kreiman and A. Ojeda, eds.,Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora. (pp. 1–28) Chicago Linguistic Society.Promise and the Theory of Control 263
162. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.
163. Borer, H. (1986) “1-Subjects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 375–416.
164. Bowers, J. (1973) Grammatical Relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
165. Brody, M. and M. R. Manzini (1988) “On Implicit Arguments,” in R. Kempson, ed., Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. (pp. 105–130) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
166. Chierchia, G. (1984) Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. Doctoral dissertation,University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
167. Chomsky, N. (1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, manuscript. (Published as The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, New York: Plenum, 1975.)
168. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
169. Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York: Praeger.
170. Dowty, D. (1978) “Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 393–426.
171. Dowty, D. (1985) “On Recent Analyses of the Semantics of Control,” Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 291–331.
172. Dowty, D. (1988) “Thematic Proto-Roles, Subject Selection, and Lexical Defaults,” colloquium paper presented at the 1987 Winter Meetings of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA.
173. Farkas, D. (1988) “On Obligatory Control,” Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 27–58.
174. Grimshaw, J. (1979) “Complement Selection and the Lexicon,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.
175. Hoekstra, T. (1984) Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government-Binding Theory. Dordrecht:Foris.
176. Jacobson, P. (1983) “Grammatical Relations,” talk presented at the 1983 Winter Meetings of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
177. Jacobson, P. (1987) “Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations, and Discontinuous Constituents,” in G. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituents. (pp. 27–69) New York: Academic Press.
178. Koopman, H. (1983) The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.
179. Koster, J. (1978) Locality Principles in Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
180. Koster, J. (1984) “On Binding and Control,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417–459.
181. Koster, J. and R. May (1982) “The Constituency of Infinitives,” Language 58: 117–143. Larson, R. (l988a) “Implicit Arguments in Situation Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 11:169–201.
182. Larson, R. (1988b) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
183. Larson, R. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising,” Lexicon Project Working Papers 27. Center for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
184. Manzini, M. R. (1983) “On Control and Control Theory,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.
185. Mittwoch, A. (1976) “Raising or Equi or Both: Another Look at Root Modals and at Permissive Allow,” Papers in Linguistics 10: 55–75.
186. Munro, P. (1982) “On the Transitivity of ‘Say’ Verbs,” in P. Hopper and S. A. Thompson, eds.,Syntax and Semantics 15: Studies in Transitivity. (pp. 301–318) New York: Academic Press
187. Oehrle, R. (1975) The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. Doctoral dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.
188. Oh, S. (1988) “A Promising Control Theory,” in L. MacLeod, G. Larson, and D. Brentani, eds.,Papers from the 24th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, (pp. 290–303). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
189. Roberts, I. (1985) “Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries,”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58.
190. Rosenbaum, P. (1970) “A Principle Governing Deletion in English Sentential Complementation,”in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar.(pp. 20–29) Waltham, MA: Ginn.
191. Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
192. Thomason, R. (1976) “Some Extensions of Montague Grammar,” in B. Partee, ed., Montague Grammar. (pp. 77–117) New York: Academic Press.
193. Travis, L. (1985) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
194. Visser, F. T. (1963–73) An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill.
195. Williams, E. (1980) “Predication,” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.Andrews, A. (1983) “A Note on the Constituent Structure of Modifiers,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 695–697.
196. Bruening, B. (2001) “QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD” Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273
197. Büring, D. (2005) Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
198. Carrier, J. and J. Randall (1992) “The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives.”Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–234.
199. Chomsky, N. (1955/1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum Press.
200. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
201. Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
202. Chomsky, N. (1994) “Bare Phrase Structure,” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
203. Culicover, P. W. and M. Rochemont. (1997) “Deriving Dependent Right Adjuncts in English.” in H. van Riemsdijk, D. LeBlanc, and D. Beermann, eds., Rightward Movement (pp. 279–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
204. Diesing, M. (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
205. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
206. Engdahl, E. (1983) “Parasitic Gaps,” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34.
207. Ernst, T. (1994) “M-Command and Precedence,” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 327–335.
208. Ernst, T. (2001) The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
209. Heim, I. and A. Kratzer (1997) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
210. Herburger, E. (2000) On What Counts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
211. Hoekstra, T. (1988) “Small Clause Results,” Lingua 74: 101–139.
212. Jacobson, P. (1983) “Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations,” LSA Forum Lecture, Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN.
213. Jacobson, P. (1984) “Verb-Particle Constructions in Phrase Structure Grammar,” invited colloquium presentation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, December.
214. Jacobson, P. (1987) “Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituents,” in G. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency (pp. 27–69).
215. Kawamura, T. (2007) Some Interactions of Focus and Focus Sensitive Elements. Doctoral dissertation,Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
216. Kratzer, A. (2004) “Building Resultatives,” unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts,Amherst, MA.
217. Krifka, M. (1989) “Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics,” in R. B Artsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression (pp. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris.
218. Artsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression (1992) “Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution,”in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolcsi, eds., Lexical Matters (pp. 29–54). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
219. Artsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expression (1998) “The Origins of Telicity,” in S. Rothstein, ed., Events and Grammar, (pp. 197–236). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
220. Kuno, S. and K. Takami (1993) Grammar and Discourse Principles: Functional Syntax and GB Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
221. Larson, R. (1988) “On the Double Object Construction, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
222. Larson, R. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising,” Lexicon Project Working Papers No. 27. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT. Republished in this volume.
223. Larson, R. (1990) “Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 598–632.
224. Larson, R. (1991) “The Projection of DP and DegP,” unpublished manuscript, Stony Brook University,Stony Brook, NY
225. Larson, R. (2004) “Sentence-Final Adverbs and ‘scope’,” in M. Wolf and K. Moulton, eds., Proceedings of NELS 34 (pp. 23–43). Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
226. Larson, R. and G. Segal (1995) Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
227. Montague, R. (1974) Formal Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
228. Nissenbaum, J. (2000) “Covert Movement and Parasitic Gaps,” in M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee,N. Hall, and Y.-J. Kim, eds., Proceedings of NELS 30 (pp. 541–555). Amherst MA: GLSA,University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
229. Oehrle, R. (1983) “The Inaccessibility of the Inner NP: Corrections and Speculations,” Linguistic Analysis 12.2: 159–171.
230. Partee, B. (1991) “Tropic, Focus and Quantification,” in S. Moore and A. Z. Wyner, eds., Proceedings from SALT 1, 159–187. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University.
231. Pesetsky, D. (1995) Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
232. Phillips, C. (2003) “Linear Order and Constituency,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.
233. Reinhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
234. Rochemont, M. and P. Culicover (1991) “In Defense of Rightward Movement,” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 11. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.
235. Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge MA.
236. Tenny, C. (1994) Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
237. Thomason, R. and R. Stalnaker (1973) “A Semantic Theory of Adverbs,” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 195–220.
238. Tortora, C. (1997) The Syntax and Semantics of the Weak Locative. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
239. Wechsler, S. (2005) “Resultatives under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity.” in N Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport, eds., The Syntax of Aspect—Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (pp. 255–273). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
240. Wexler, K. and P. Culicover (1980) A Formal Theory of Language Learnability. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
241. Williams, E. (1981) “Argument Structure and Morphology,” The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114.
242. Williams, E. (1994) Thematic Structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
243. Abbott, B. (1976) “Right Node Raising as a Test for Constituenthood,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 639–642.
244. Adams, M. (1987) “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–32.
245. Andrews, A. (1982) “A Note on the Constituent Structure of Adverbs and Auxiliaries,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 313–317.
246. Bach, E. (1979) “Control in Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515–531.
247. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation. Chicago: Chicago University. Press.
248. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.
249. Belletti, A. (1988) “The Case of Unaccusatives,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1–34.
250. Borer, H. (1980) “Empty Subjects in Modern Hebrew and Constraints on Thematic Relations,” in J. Jensen, ed., Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa: Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society (pp. 25–37). Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
251. Bowers, J. (1973) Grammatical Relations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
252. Bresnan, J. (1976) “On the Form and Function of Transformations,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 3–40.
253. Browning, M. (1987) Null Operator Constructions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
254. Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
255. Choe, H.S. (1987) “An SVO Analysis of VSO Languages and Parametrization: A Study of Berber,” in M. Guerssel and K. Hale, eds., Studies in Berber Syntax (pp. 121-158). MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers no. 14, Cambridge, MA.
256. Chomsky, N. (1955/1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum Press.
257. Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
258. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
259. Chomsky, N. (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
260. Chomsky, N (1986a) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
261. Chomsky, N (1986b) Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
262. Christensen, K. K. (1987) “Modern Norwegian ingen and the ghost of an Old Norse particle,” in R.D.S. Allen and M.P. Barnes, eds., Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of Teachers if Scandinavian Studies in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (pp.1–17). London: University College London.
263. Chung, S. (1976) “An Object-Creating Rule in Bahasa Indonesia,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 41–87.
264. Chung, S. (1983) “The ECP and Government in Chamorro,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 207–244.
265. Chung, S. (1987) “The Syntax of Chamorro Existential Sentences,” in E. Reuland, and A. ter Meulen, eds., The Representation of (In)definiteness (pp. 191–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
266. Chung, S. and J. McCloskey (1987) “Government, Barriers, and Small Clauses in Modern Irish,” Linguistic Inquiry 18: 173–237.
267. Contreras, H. (1984) “A Note on Parasitic Gaps,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 698–701.
268. Cowper, E. (1985) “Parasitic Gaps, Coordinate Structures, and the Subjacency Condition,” in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough, eds., Proceedings of NELS 15 (pp. 75–86). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
269. Deprez, V. (1987) “Stylistic Inversion and the Structure of COMP,” unpublished manuscript., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
270. Di Sciullo, A. and E. Williams (1987) On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
271. Dowty, D. (1978) “Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 393–426.
272. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
273. Engdahl, E. (1983) “Parasitic Gaps,” Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34.
274. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1987) “Right Node Raising,” in M. Browning, E. Czaykowski-Higgins, and E. Ritter, eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 9, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
275. Filmore, C. (1965) Indirect Objects and the Ordering of Transformations. The Hague; Mouton.
276. Green, G. (1974) “A Syntactic Syncretism in English and French,” in B. Kachru, R.B. Lees, Y. Malkiel, A. Pietrangeli, and S. Saporta, eds., Issues in Linguistics (pp. 257–278). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
277. Grosu, A. (1976) “A Note on Subject Raising to Object and Right Node Raising,” Linguistic Inquiry 7: 642–645.
278. Guéron, J. (1980) “On the Syntax and Semantics of PP Extraposition,” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637–678.
279. Higginbotham, J. (1985) “On Semantics,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–593.
280. Huybregts, R. and H. van Riemsdijk (1985) “Parasitic Gaps and ATB,” in S. Berman, J. W. Choe, and J. McDonough, eds., Proceedings of NELS 15 (pp. 168–187) Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
281. Jacobson, P. (1983) “Grammatical Relations,” paper presented at the 1983 Winter Meetings of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
282. Jacobson, P. (1987) “Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituents,” in G. Huch and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency (pp. 27–69). New York: Academic Press.
283. Jones, M. (1988) “Cognate Objects and the Case Filter,” Journal of Linguistics 24: 89–110.
284. Kayne, R. (1979) “Rightward NP Movement in French and English,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 710–719.
285. Kayne, R. (1981) “ECP Extensions,” Linguistic Inquiry 12: 93–133.
286. Kayne, R. (1984) “Connectedness,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 223–229.
287. Kayne, R. and J.-Y. Pollock (1978) “Stylistic Inversion, Successive Cyclicity, and Move NP,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 595–621. Light Predicate Raising 365
288. Kimball, J. (1973) “The Grammar of Existence,” in C. Corum, C. T. Smith Stark, and A. Weiser, eds., Papers from the Nineth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 262–270). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
289. Koopman, H. (1984) The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.
290. Lakoff, G. (1986) “Frame Semantic Control of the Coordinate Structure Constraint,” in A. Farley, P. Farley, and K.-E. McCullough, eds., Proceeding of CLS 22 (Part 2), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory (pp.152–167). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
291. Larson, R. (1983) Restrictive Modification: Relative Clauses and Adverbs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
292. Larson, R. (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
293. Larson, R. (1990) “Extraction and Multiple Selection in PP,” The Linguistic Review 7: 169–182.
294. Larson, R. (1991) “Promise and the Theory of Control,” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 103–139.
295. Lasnik, H. (1992) “Case and expletives: toward a parametric account,” Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381-405.
296. Lasnik, H. and J. Uriagareka (1988) A Course in GB. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
297. Levine, R. (1985) “Right Node (Non-)Raising,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 492–497.
298. Li, Y. (1988) “On V-V Compounds in Chinese,” paper presented at the MIT Workshop on Serial Verbs, MIT, April 11.
299. Marantz, A. (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
300. May, R. (1985) Logical Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
301. McCawley, J. (1982) “Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.
302. McCloskey, J. (1986) “Right Node Raising and Preposition Stranding,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 183–186.
303. McCloskey, J. and K. Hale (1984) “On the Syntax of Person-Number Inflection in Modern Irish,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 487–534.
304. Milsark, G. (1974) Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
305. Mohanon, K. (1982) “Grammatical Relations and Clause Structure in Malayalam,” in J. Bresnan, ed., The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp. 504–589). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
306. Perlmutter, D. (1978) “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis,” in J. Jaeger and A. Woodbury, eds., Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 157–189). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
307. Platzack, (1987) “The Scandinavian Languages and the Null-Subject Parameter,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 377–401.
308. Pollock, J-.Y. (1986) “The Syntax of en and the Null Subject Parameter,” unpublished manuscript. Paris.
309. Rapoport, T. (1986) “Nonverbal Predication in Hebrew,” in The Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 207–218). Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.
310. Reinhart, T. (1979) “Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules,” in F. Guenthner and S. Schmidt, eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language (pp. 107–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
311. Rizzi, L. (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
312. Roberts, I. (1985) “Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58.
313. Ross, J. (1967/1986) Infinite Syntax. New York: Ablex.
314. Rothstein, S. (1983) Syntactic Forms of Predication. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
315. Safir, K. (1985) Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
316. Schein, B. (1995) “Small Clauses and Predication,” in A. Cardinaletti and M. Guasti, eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 28; Small Clauses (pp. 49–76). New York: Academic Press.
317. Shlonsky, U. (1986) “Donkey Parasites,” in J. McDonough and B. Plunkett, eds., Proceedings of NELS 17 (pp. 569–579). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
318. Shlonsky, U. (1987) Null and Displaced Subjects. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
319. Siewierska, A. (1984) The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.
320. Simpson, J. (1984) Aspects of Warlpiri Morphology and Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
321. Sproat, R. (1985) “Welsh Syntax and VSO Structure,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 173–216.
322. Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 366 On Shell Structure
323. Szabolsci, A. (1986) “From the Definiteness Effect to Lexical Integrity,” in W. Abraham and S. de Meji, eds., Topic, Focus and Configurationality (pp. 321–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
324. Talmy, L. (1985) “Lexicalization Patterns,” in T. Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description No. 3 (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
325. Taraldsen, T. (1981) “The Theoretical Implications of a Class of Marked Extractions,” in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi, eds., Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference. (pp. 475–516). Pisa, Italy: Scuola Normale Superiore.
326. Torrego, E. (1984) “On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–129.
327. Travis, L. (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
328. Wexler, K. and P. Culicover (1980) A Formal Theory of Language Learnability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
329. Williams, E. (1978) “Across-the-Board Rule Application,” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
330. Williams, E (1980) “Predication,” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.
331. Awoyale, Y. (1987). “Perspectives on Verb Serialization,” paper presented at the First Workshop in Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
332. Awoyale, Y. (1988). “Complex Predicates and Verb Serialization.” MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
333. Baker, M. (1991). “On the relation of serialization to verb extensions,” in C. Lefebvre, ed., Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
334. Bamgboe, A. (1974). “On Serial Verbs and Verbal Status,.” Journal of West African Linguistics 9: 17–48.
335. Carstens, V. (1988). “Serial Verbs in Yoruba,.” paper presented at the Second Workshop in Niger- Congo Syntax and Semantics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
336. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
337. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
338. Collins, C. (1987). “Notes on Serial Verb Constructions in Ewe,” unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
339. Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic Affixation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
340. Givón, T. (1971). “On the Verbal Origin of the Bantu Suffixes,” Studies in African Linguistics 2: 145–163.
341. Givón, T. (1991). “Some substantive issues concerning verb serialization: Grammatical vs. cognitive packaging,” in C. Lefebvre, ed., Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 137–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
342. Hale, K. (1991). “Misumalpan verb sequencing constuctions,” in C. Lefebvre, ed., Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 1–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
343. Hale, K. and J. Keyser (1987). “A View from the Middle.” MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Cognitive Science.
344. Higginbotham, J. (1985). “On Semantics,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–593.
345. Larson, R. (1988). “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
346. Larson, R. (1989). “Light predicate raising,” MIT Lexicon Project Working Papers 27. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Republished in this volume.
347. Lefebvre, C. (1991). “Take serial verb constructions in Fon,” in C. Lefebvre, ed., Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 37–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
348. Li, Y. (1991). “On deriving serial verb constructions,” in C. Lefebvre, ed., Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches (pp. 103–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
349. Lord, C. (1973). “Serial Verbs in Transition,” Studies in African Linguistics 4: 269–296.
350. Lord, C. (1974). “Causative Constructions in Yoruba,” Studies in African Linguistics, Suppl 5. 195–204.
351. Lord, C. (1982). “The Development of Object Markers in Serial Verb Languages,” in P. Hopper and S. Thompson, eds., Syntax and Semantics 15: Studies in Transitivity, New York: Academic Press.
352. Muysken, P. (1987). “Parameters for Serial Verbs,” paper presented at the First Workshop in Niger-Congo Syntax and Semantics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
353. Roberts, Ian. (1985). “Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58.
354. Schachter, P. (1974a). “A Non-Transformational Account of Serial Verbs,” Studies in African Linguistics, Suppl. 5: 252–270.
355. Schachter, P. (1974b). “Serial Verbs: A Reply to a Reply,” Studies in African Linguistics, Suppl. 5: 278–282.
356. Sebba, M. (1987). The Syntax of Serial Verbs: An Investigation into Serialization in Sranan and Other Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
357. Stahlke, H. (1970). “Serial Verbs,” Studies in African Linguistics 1: 60–99.
358. Stahlke, H. (1974). “Serial Verbs,” Studies in African Linguistics. Suppl. 5: 271–277.
359. Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
360. Williams, E. (1983). “Against small clauses,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 287–308.
361. Alexiadou, A. (1994) Issues in the Syntax of Adverbs. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Potsdam.
362. Williams, E. (1997) Adverb Placement; A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
363. Williams, E. (2002) “The Syntax of Adverbs: Puzzles and Results,” GLOT 6(2/3): 33–54.
364. Anderson, S. (1992) A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
365. Andrews, A. (1983) “A Note on the Constituent Structure of Modifiers,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 695–697.
366. Bach, E. (1996) “The Grammar of Complex Words,” in A.-M. di Sciullo, ed., Configurations. (pp. 1–36) Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
367. Baker, M. (1985) “The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation,” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.
368. Cinque, G. (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads. New York: Oxford Universitry Press.
369. Cinque, G. (2002) “Complement and Adverbial PPs: Implications for Clause-Structure,” unpublished abstract, University of Venice.
370. Condoravdi, C. (1989) “The Middle: Where Semantics and Morphology Meet,” in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 11, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
371. Davidson, D. (1967a) “Causal Relations,” Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703.
372. Davidson, D. (1967b) “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” in N. Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action (pp. 81–120). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
373. De Swart, H. (1993) Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach. New York: Garland.
374. Diesing, M. (1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
375. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning in Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
376. Ernst, T. (1994) “M-Command and Precedence,” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 327–335.
377. Ernst, T. (2001) The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
378. Heim, I. and A. Kratzer (1997) Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
379. Heinämäki, O. (1978) Semantics of English Temporal Connectives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas-Austin.
380. Herburger, E. (2000) On What Counts. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
381. Higginbotham, J. (1989) “Elucidations of Meaning,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 465–517.
382. Hooper, J. and S. Thompson (1973) “On the Applicability of Root Transformations,” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.
383. Jackendoff, R. (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
384. Johnston, M. (1994) The Syntax and Semantics of Adverbial Adjuncts. Doctoral dissertation, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz.
385. Kayne, R. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
386. Kratzer, A. (1986) “Conditionals,” in A. M. Farely, P. Farely, and K.E. McCullough, eds., Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 22: Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory (pp. 115–135). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
387. Laenzlinger, C. (1996) “Adverb Syntax and Phrase-Structure,” in A.-M. di Sciullo, ed., Configurations (pp. 99–127). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
388. Larson, R. (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
389. Larson, R. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising,” Lexicon Project Working Papers No. 27. Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT. Republished in this volume.
390. Larson, R. (1991) “Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 598–632.
391. Larson, R. (2003) “Time and Event Measure,” in J. Hawthorne and D. Zimmerman, eds., Philosophical Perspectives, 17, Language and Philosophical Linguistics (pp. 257–258). Oxford: Blackwell.
392. Lewis, D. (1975) “Adverbs of Quantification,” in E. Keenan, ed., Formal Semantics of Natural guage (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
393. tague, R (1974) Formal Philosophy. New Haven, CT Yale University Press.
394. sons, T. (1990) Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
395. etsky, D. (1995) Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
396. Phillips, C. (2003) “Linear Order and Constituency,” Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.
397. nhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
398. hemont, M. (1985) Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
399. th, M. (1985) Association with Focus. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, erst.
400. th, M. (1992) “A Theory of Focus Interpretation,” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
401. ada, M. and R. Larson (2004) “Presupposition and root transforms in adjunct clauses,” in Wolf and K. Moulton, eds., Proceedings of NELS 34 (pp. 517–528). Amherst, MA: GLSA versity of Massachusetts-Amherst.
402. Oik, T. (1990) “Adverbs as V-Sisters,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654–661.
403. Oik, T. (1992a) “Adverbs and Antedecedent-Contained Deletion,” Linguistics 30: 375–380.
404. Oik, T. (1992b) “On the Distribution of Temporal and Locative,” The Linguistic Review 9: 267–284.
405. Oik, T. (1996) Minimalism, Scope and VP-Structure. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
406. mason, R. and R. Stalnaker (1973) “A Semantic Theory of Adverbs,” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 220.
407. liams, E. (1974) Rule Ordering in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
408. Abney, S. (1987) The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, bridge, MA.
409. wise, J. and R. Cooper (1981) “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,” Linguistics Philosophy 4: 159–219.
410. nstein, J. (2001) “The DP Hypothesis: Identifying Clausal Properties in the Nominal Domain,” M. Baltin and C. Collins, eds., The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. (536–561). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
411. ge, G. (1953) The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. J. L. Austin. New York: Philosophical rary. Originally published 1884.
412. ui, N. and M. Speas (1986) “Specifiers and Projection,” in N. Fukui, T. Rapoport, and E. Sagey, eds., Papers in Theoretical Linguistics (pp. 85–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working ers in Linguistics.
413. sti, G. (1997) “The categorial status of determiners,” in Liliane Haegeman, ed., The New parative Syntax (pp. 124–144). New York: Longman.
414. sti, G. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, versity of Massachusetts, Amherst.; Published 1989, New York: Garland.
415. ginbotham, J. and R. May (1981) “Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing,” The Linguistic iew 1: 41–80.
416. nstein, N. (1999) “Movement and Control,” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96.
417. nne, L. (1978) Aspects of Hopi Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
418. nne, L. (1981) “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation,” in J.A.G. Groenendijk al., eds., Formal Methods in the Study of Language; Mathematical Centre Tracts 135. (277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.
419. nan, E. and Y. Stavi (1983) “A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners,” guistics and Philosophy 9: 253–326.
420. ula, M. (2008) Adnominal Possession and Ditransitives. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm versity.
421. son, R. (1991) “The Projection of DP and DegP Structure,” unpublished manuscript, State versity of New York—Stony Brook Republished in this volume.
422. son, R. (1988) “On the double object construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
423. son, R. (1968) The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.
424. etsky, D. and E. Torrego (2004) “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features,” ublished manuscript, MIT and University of Massachusetts, Boston. On Shell Structure
425. lock, J.-Y. (1989) “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP,” Linguistic uiry 20: 365–424.
426. tal, P. (1969) “On So-Called ‘Pronouns’ in English,” in D. Reibel and S. Schane, eds., Modern dies in English (pp. 201–224). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
427. Bolcsi, A. (1983) “The Possessor That Ran Away from Home,” The Linguistic Review 3: 102.
428. Bolcsi, A. (1989) “Noun Phrases and Clauses: Is DP Analogous to IP or CP?”, unpublished ms., New York University, New York.
429. Bolcsi, A. (1992) “Subordination: Articles and Complementizers,” in I. Kenesei and Cs. Pléh, eds., Approaches to Hungarian 4 (pp. 123–137). Szeged: JATE.
430. Bolcsi, A. (1994) “The Noun Phrase,” in I. Kenesei, ed., Syntax and Semantics 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian (pp. 179–275). New York: Academic Press.
431. Vassilieva, M., and R. Larson (2005) “The Semantics of the Plural Pronoun Construction,” Natural Language Semantics 13: 101–124.
432. Abney, S. (1987) The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
433. Anderson, M. (1983/1984) “Prenominal Genitive NPs,” The Linguistic Review 3: 1–24.
434. Bach, E. and R. Cooper (1978) “The NP-S Analysis of Relative Clauses and Compositional Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 2: l45–l50.
435. Baker, C. L. (1978) Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
436. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
437. Baltin, M. (1987) “Degree Complements,” in G. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Syntax and Semantics. Vol 20: Discontinuous Constituency (pp. 11–26). New York: Academic Press.
438. Barss, A. and H. Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–354.
439. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1981) “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,” Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219.
440. Bowers, J. (1975) “Adjectives and Adverbs in English,” Foundations of Language 13: 529–562.
441. Burton, S. (1995) Six Issues to Consider in “Choosing a Husband.” Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
442. Carrier-Duncan, J. (1985) “Linking of Thematic Roles in Derivational Word-ormation,”Linguistic Inquiry 16: 1–34.
443. Chomsky, N. (1970) “Remarks on Nominalization,” in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar (pp. 184–221). Boston: Ginn.
444. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
445. Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
446. Cooper, R. (1979) “The Interpretation of Pronouns,” in F. Heny and H. Schnelle, eds., Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 10: Selections from the Third Gröningen Roundtable (pp. 61–92). New York: Academic Press.
447. Corver, N. (1990) The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University , The Netherlands.
448. Davidson, D. (1967) “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” in N. Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action (pp. 81–120). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
449. Davies, M. (1981) Meaning, Quantification, Necessity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
450. Dixon, R.M.W. (1966) “Relative Clauses and Possessive Phrases in Two Australian Languages,” Language 45: 35–44.
451. Dixon, R.M.W. (1977) “Where Have All the Adjectives Gone?” Studies in Language 1: 19–80.
452. owty, D., R. Wall, and S. Peters (1981) An Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
453. rescher, E. (1977) “Logical Representation and Linguistic Theory,” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 351–378.
454. rescher, E. and N. Hornstein (1979) “Trace Theory and NP Movement Rules,” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 65–82.
455. Frege, G. (1953) The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. J. L. Austin. New York: Philosophical ibrary. Originally published 1884.
456. ukui, N. and M. Speas (1986) “Specifiers and Projection,” in N. Fukui, T. Rapoport, and E. Sagey, ds., Papers in Theoretical Linguistics (pp. 85–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers n Linguistics.
457. iorgi, A. and P. Longobardi (1990) The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University ress.
458. rimshaw, J. (1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
459. uéron, J. and R. May (1984) “Extraposition and Logical Form,” Linguistic Inquiry 15: 1–31.
460. etzron, R. (1978) “On the Relative Order of Adjectives,” in H. Seiler, ed., Language Universals pp. (165–184). Tübingen: Narr.
461. igginbotham, J. (1983) “Logical Form, Binding and Nominals,” Linguistic Inquiry 14: 469–708.
462. igginbotham, J. and R. May (1981) “Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing,” The Linguistic eview 1: 41–80.
463. oeksema, J. (1984) “Partitives,” unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
464. udson, R. (1973) “Tense and Time Reference in Reduced Relative Clauses,” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 255–256.
465. ackendoff, R. (1977) X-bar Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
466. acobs, R. and P. Rosenbaum (1968) English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
467. ayne, R. (1984) “Unambiguous Paths,” in Connectedness and Binary Branching, Studies in Generative rammar 16, (pp. 129–164). Dordrecht: Foris. he Projection of DP (and DegP) 479
468. eenan, E. and Y. Stavi (1983) “A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners,” inguistics and Philosophy 9: 253–326.
469. lein, E. (1980) “A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives,” Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45.
470. uroda, S. Y. (1969) “English Relativization and Certain Other Related Problems,” in D. Reibel nd S. Schane, eds., Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar pp. (264–287). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
471. appin, S. (1988) “The Semantics of ‘Many’ as a Weak Determiner,” Linguistics 26: 977–998.
472. arson, R. (1982) “A Note on the Interpretation of Adjoined Relative Clauses,” Linguistics and hilosophy 5: 473–482.
473. Arson, R. (1987) “‘Missing prepositions’ and the analysis of English free relative clauses,” Linguistic nquiry 16: 239–266.
474. Arson, R. (1988a) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
475. Arson, R. (1988b) “Scope and Comparatives,” Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 1–26.
476. Arson, R. (1989) “Light Predicate Raising.” MIT Lexicon Project Papers 27. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
477. Arson, R. (1990a) “Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff,” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632.
478. Arson, R. (1990b) “Semantics,” in: D. Osherson, ed., Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 1: Language, ambridge. MA: MIT Press.
479. Arson, R. (1991) “Promise and the Theory of Control”, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 103–139.
480. udlow, P. and S. Neale (1991) “Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell,” Linguistics and hilosophy 14: 171–202.
481. yons, C. (1986) “The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions,” Journal of Linguistics 22: 23–143.
482. May, R. (1985) Logical form; its structure and derivation. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
483. McCawley, J. (1981) “The Syntax and Semantics of English Relative Clauses,” Lingua 53: 99–149.
484. McCawley, J. (1982) “Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 1–106.
485. McCawley, J. (1988) The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
486. cCloskey, J. (1986) “Right-Node Raising and Preposition-Stranding,” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 83–186.
487. ontague, R. (1974) “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English,” in Montague (1974) Formal Philosophy (pp. 247–270). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
488. eale, S. (1990) Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
489. ikiforidou, K. (1987) “Constituency Considerations in Too and Enough Constructions,” aper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San rancisco, CA.
490. Partee, B. (1976) “Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar,” in B. Partee, ed., Montague Grammar (pp. 51–76). New York: Academic Press.
491. Partee, B. (1983/1997) “Uniformity vs. Versatility: The Genitive, a Case Study,” Appendix to Theo.
492. Janssen (1997) “Compositionality,” in J. v. Benthem and A. ter Meulen, eds., The Handbook of Logic and Language (pp. 464–470). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
493. Perlmutter, D. (1981) Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
494. Perlmutter, D. and C. Rosen (1984) Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
495. Postal, P. (1969) “On So-Called ‘Pronouns’ in English,” in D. Reibel and S. Schane, eds., Modern Studies in English (pp. 201–224). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
496. Postal, P. (1974) “On Certain Ambiguities,” Linguistic Inquiry 5: 367–424.
497. Rescher, N. (1962) “Plurality Quantification,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 27: 373–374.
498. Ross, J. R. (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
499. Ross, J. R. (1973) “A Proposed Rule of Tree-Pruning,” in D. Reibel and S. Schane, eds., Modern Studies in English (pp. 288–299). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
500. Ross, J. R. (1981) Infinite Syntax. New York: Ablex.
501. Rothstein, S. (1988) “Conservativity and the Syntax of Determiners,” Linguistics 26: 999–1019.
502. Russell, B. (1905) “On Denoting,” Mind 14: 479–493.
503. Sag, I. (1976) “Deletion and logical form,” Doctoral thesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
504. Seuren, P. (1973) “The Comparative,” in F. Kiefer and N. Ruwet, eds., Generative Grammar in Europe. (pp. 528–564). Dordrecht: Reidel.
505. Siegel, D. (1974) Topics in English Morphology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
506. Smith, C. (1964) “Determiners and Relative Clauses in Generative Grammar,” Language 40: 37–52.
507. Sproat, R. and C. Shih (1991) “The Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Adjective Ordering Restrictions,” in C. P. Georgopoulos and R. L. Ishihara, eds., Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda (pp. 565–593). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
508. Stockwell, R., P. Schacter, and B. Partee (1970) The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
509. towell, T. (1981) Origins of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
510. Szabolsci, A. (1983) “The Possessor That Ran Away from Home,” The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102.
511. Vendler, Z. (1967) Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
512. Wiggins, D. (1980) “‘Most’ and ‘All’: Some Comments on a Familiar Program and the Logical Form of Quantified Sentences,” in M. Platts, ed., Reference, Truth and Reality (pp. 318–346). on: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
513. Williams, E. (1977) “Discourse and logical form,” Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139.
514. Williams, E. (1985) “PRO and the Subject of NP,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 277–295.
515. Williams, E. (1987) “Implicit Arguments, the Binding Theory, and Control,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 151–180.