QR obeys superiority: Frozen scope and ACD

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 233-273

  Bruening, Benjamin ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Covert movement; Double objects; Quantifiers; Relativized Minimality; Scope; Superiority

Indexed keywords

EID: 18644381193     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/00243890152001762     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Anderson, Stephen R. 1971. On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language 7:387-396.
2. Anderson, Stephen R. 1977. Comments on the paper by Wasow. In Formal syntax, ed. Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 361-377. New York: Academic Press.
3. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1989. Constituency and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 20:141-172.
4. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1993. Syntax of scope. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Arad, Maya. 1998. VP-structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Doctoral dissertation, University College London. [Reprinted as MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.]
6. Barss, Andrew. 1986. Chains and anaphoric dependence: On reconstruction and its implications. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
7. Barss, Andrew, and Howard Lasnik. 1986. A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347-354.
8. Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159-219.
9. Basilico, David. 1998. Object position and predication forms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 541-595.
10. Beghelli, Filippo. 1996. The syntax of distributivity and pair-list readings. In Ways of scope taking, ed. Anna Szabolcsi, 349-408. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell. 1996. Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every. In Ways of scope taking, ed. Anna Szabolcsi, 71-107. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Berman, Steve, and Arild Hestvik. 1991. LF: A critical survey. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.
13. Bošković, Željko. 1995. Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian. Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs.
14. Bouton, Lawrence. 1970. Antecedent contained preforms. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 154-167. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
15. Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70:72-131.
16. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1993. Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1:181-234.
17. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232-286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. [Reprinted in Noam Chomsky, Essays on form and interpretation, 81-160. New York: North-Holland (1977).]
19. Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
20. Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
21. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Categories and transformations. In The Minimalist Program, 219-394. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Also available as MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15, MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.]
24. Chomsky, Noam. To appear. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
25. Collins, Chris. 1997. Local economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26. Collins, Chris, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1996. VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27:391-444.
27. Dikken, Marcel den. 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Dikken, Marcel den, and René Mulder. 1991. Double object scrambling. In MIT working papers in linguistics 14: Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 67-82. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
29. Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
30. Falk, Cecilia. 1990. On double object constructions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 46:53-100.
31. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
32. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968a. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory, ed. Emmon Bach and R. T. Harms, 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968b. Lexical entries for verbs. Foundations of Language 4:373-393.
34. Fox, Danny. 1995a. Condition C effects in ACD. In MIT working papers in linguistics 27: Papers on minimalist syntax, 105-119. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
35. Fox, Danny. 1995b. Economy and scope. Natural Language Semantics 3:283-341.
36. Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press and MITWPL.
37. Gruber, Jeffrey S. 2000. Thematic relations in syntax. In A handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark R. Baltin and Chris Collins, 257-298. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Haegeman, Liliane. 1993. The morphology and distribution of object clitics in West Flemish. Studia Linguistica 47:57-94.
39. Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. The typology of syntactic positions: L-relatedness and the A/A′ distinction. In Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, ed. Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson, and C. Jan-Wouter Zwart, 141-165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Haegeman, Liliane, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8:233-251.
41. Hale, Ken, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1997. On the double-object construction. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
42. Hall, Barbara. 1965. Subject and object in Modern English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
43. Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
44. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Higginbotham, James. 1980. Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11:679-708.
46. Hoekstra, Teun, and René Mulder. 1990. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7:1-79.
47. Hornstein, Norbert. 1994. An argument for minimalism: The case of antecedent-contained deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 25:455-480.
48. Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form: From GB to minimalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
49. Hornstein, Norbert, and David Lightfoot. 1987. Predication and PRO. Language 63:23-52.
50. Huang, C.-T. James. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24:103-138.
51. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:577-636.
52. Johnson, Kyle, and Satoshi Tomioka. 1997. Lowering and mid-size clauses. In Proceedings of the Tübingen Workshop on Reconstruction, 177-198. Universität Tübingen.
53. Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
54. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 28:662-688.
55. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Restricting unambiguous rule-application: A unified analysis of movement. In MIT working papers in linguistics 24: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics I, 179-209. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
56. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1995. Target a: Deducing strict cyclicity from derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 26:47-77.
57. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1996. Raising quantifiers without quantifier raising. In Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, ed. Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson, and C. Jan-Wouter Zwart, 189-198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary operations and optimal derivations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
59. Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85:211-258.
60. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 109-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope: Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163-196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
62. Kuno, Susumu. 1971. The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 2:333-378.
63. Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19:335-391.
64. Larson, Richard K. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21:589-632.
65. Larson, Richard K., and Robert May. 1990. Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21:103-122.
66. Lasnik, Howard. 1993. Lectures on minimalist syntax. UConn Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
67. Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
69. Manzini, Maria Rita. 1983. Restructuring and reanalysis. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
70. Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, ed. Sam A. Mchombo, 113-150. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. [Distributed by Cambridge University Press.]
71. Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, 201-225. Penn Linguistics Circle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
72. May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
73. May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
74. May, Robert. 1988. Ambiguities of quantification and wh: A reply to Williams. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 118-135.
75. McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Locality in A-movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
76. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 28:1-25.
77. Myers, Scott. 1984. Zero-derivation and inflection. In MIT working papers in linguistics 7: Papers from the January 1984 MIT Workshop on Morphology, 53-69. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
78. Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Scrambling as a D-Structure phenomenon. In Studies on scrambling: Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena, ed. Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk, 387-429. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
79. Oehrle, Richard. 1976. The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
80. Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiences and cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
81. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
82. Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
83. Pica, Pierre, and William Snyder. 1994. Weak crossover, scope, and agreement in a minimalist framework. In Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 334-349. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. [Distributed by Cambridge University Press.]
84. Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20:335-397.
85. Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
86. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On chain formation. In Syntax and semantics 19: The syntax of pronominal clitics, ed. Hagit Borer, 65-95. New York: Academic Press.
87. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
88. Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:445-501.
89. Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
90. Sauerland, Uli. 2000. Syntactic economy and quantifier raising. Ms., Universität Tübingen.
91. Sauerland, Uli, and Paul Elbourne. 1999. Total reconstruction, PF-movement, and derivational order. Ms., Universität Tübingen and MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
92. Schmitt, Cristina. 1995. Antecedent contained deletion meets the copy theory. In NELS 25, 425-439. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
93. Seidl, Amanda. 1999. Object asymmetries and their morphophonological reflexes. In Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 490-505. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
94. Soh, Hooi-Ling. 1998. Object scrambling in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
95. Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 213-276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
96. Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
97. Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2:285-312.
98. Stroik, Thomas. 1996. Minimalism, scope, and VP structure. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
99. Takano, Yuji. 1998. Object shift and scrambling. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17:817-889.
100. Williams, Edwin. 1988. Is LF distinct from S-Structure? A reply to May. Linguistic Inquiry 19:135-146.
101. Wurmbrand, Susanne. 1998. Infinitives. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.