Internationalising the curriculum for all students: The role of staff dialogue

Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 251-264

  Clifford, Valerie ^a   Henderson, Juliet ^b   Montgomery, Catherine ^c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917002688     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203098035     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Banks, J. A. (1993). Approaches to multicultural reform. in J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Bates, S., Hardy, J., Hill, J. & McKain, D. (2007-2008). How design of online learning materials can accommodate the heterogeneity in student abilities, aptitudes and aspirations. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 2, 3-25.
3. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
4. Becher, T. & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the disciplines, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. Brew, A. & Barrie, S. (1999). Academic development through a negotiated curriculum. International Journal of Academic Development, 4 (1), 34-51.
6. Britain, S. & Liber, O. (1999). A framework for pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments. JTAP report 41. JISC. Retrieved 26 April 2011 from www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/jtap/jtap-041.pdf
7. Clegg, S., Rowland, S., Mann, S., Davidson, M. & Clifford, V. A. (2004). Reconceptualising academic development: Reconciling pleasure and critique in safe spaces. in L. Elvidge (ed.), Exploring academic development in higher education: Issues of engagement. Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates.
8. Clifford, V. A. (2009). Engaging the disciplines in internationalising the curriculum. International Journal of Academic Development, 14 (2), 133-143.
9. CICIN. (n.d.) Internationalising the curriculum resource kit. CICIN, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved 10 May 2011 from http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ ocsld/ioc/resourcekit.html
10. de Wit, H. (2011). Naming nationalisation will not revive it. University World News, 23 Oct, Issue 194. Retrieved 8 December 2011 from http://www.university worldnews.com/article.php?story=20111021215849411
11. Dearing, R. (1997). National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (UK) 1997: Higher education in the learning society. Report of the National Committee into Higher Education. Leeds: NCIHE.
12. Gibbs, G. & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15 (1), 87-100.
13. Gough, N. (1999). Globalization and school curriculum change: Locating a transnational imaginary. Journal of Education Policy, 14 (1), 73-84.
14. Green, W. & Mertova, P. (2011). Engaging the gatekeepers: Faculty perspectives on developing curriculum for globally responsible citizenship. in V. Clifford & C. Montgomery (eds.), Moving towards internationalisation of the curriculum for global citizenship in higher education. Oxford, UK: OCSLD, Oxford Brookes University.
15. Haigh, M. and Clifford, V. (2011). Integral vision: A multi-perspective approach to the recognition of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research and Development, 30 (5), 573-584.
16. Kitano, M. K. (1997). A rational framework for course change. in A. I. Morey & M. K. Kitano (eds.), Multicultural course transformation in higher education: A broader truth. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
18. Meyer, J. & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ETL project occasional report 4. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
19. Morey, A. I. (2000). Changing higher education curricula for a global and multicultural world. Higher Education in Europe, XXV (1), 25-39.
20. Neumann, R., Parry, S. & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (4), 405-417.
21. Pinar, W. (2005). A bridge between Chinese and North American curriculum studies. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 2 (1), 1-12.
22. Prinsloo, P. (2003). The quest for relevance: Preliminary thoughts on the issue of relevance in higher education in South Africa. Progression 25 (1). Retrieved 26 November 2011 from http://www.unisa.ac.za/default.asp?Cmd=ViewContent &ContentID=14090.
23. Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Rizvi, F. (2002). Internationalisation of the curriculum. Retrieved 19 September 2007 from http://mams.rmit.edu.au/ioc/sf012iqo4uzn.pdf (no longer available).
25. Rizvi, F. (2006). Imagination and the globalisation of educational policy research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4 (2), 193-205.
26. Sanderson, G. (2011). Internationalisation and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 30 (5) 661-676.
27. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H. & De Freitas, S. (eds.) (2010). Rethinking learning for a digital age. London: Routledge
28. Teasdale, G. R. & Ma Rhea, Z. (2000). Local knowledge and wisdom in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
29. Teekens, H. (2000). A description of nine clusters of qualifi cations for lecturers. in H. Teekens (ed.), The international classroom: Teaching and learning at home and abroad. The Hague: Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education (NUFFIC)