Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising

Ecology Letters

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 28-36

  Inger, Richard ^a   Gregory, Richard ^b   Duffy, James P ^a   Stott, Iain ^a   Voříšek, Petr ^c,d   Gaston, Kevin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^c Pan European Common Bird Monitoring   (Czech Republic)

^d PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Abundance; Avian; Biomass; Birds; Common; Conservation; Declines; Ecosystem services; Rare; Rarity

Indexed keywords

AVES;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; BIRD; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIRDS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; EUROPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84916897748     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12387     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baillie, J.E.M., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Stuart, S.N. (2004). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A global Species Assessment. IUCN (World Conservation Union), Gland, Switzerland.
2. Barton, K. (2011) Model selection and model averaging based on information criteria (AICc and alike). R package, version 1.9.5. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
3. Bates, D., Bolker, B., Maechler, M. & Walker, S. (2013) Lme4: linear mixed-effect models using Eigen and S4. R package, version 1.0-4. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
4. BirdLife International (2004). Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series no. 12. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
5. BirdLife International (2012). Species factsheets: Oenanthe isabellina & Oenanthe leucura. Available at: http://www.birdlife.org. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
6. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn.. Springer, Berlin.
7. Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A. et al. (2010). Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164-1168.
8. Caughley, G. & Gunn, A. (1995). Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
9. Chamberlain, D.E., Fuller, R.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Duckworth, J.C. & Shrubb, M. (2000). Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 771-788.
10. De Laet, J. & Summers-Smith, J.D. (2007). The status of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus in north-western Europe: a review. J. Ornithol., 148(Suppl 2), S275-S278.
11. Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc. Biol. Sci., 268, 25-29.
12. Donald, P.F., Sanderson, F.J., Burfield, I.J., Bierman, S.M., Gregory, R.D. & Waliczky, Z. (2007). International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science, 317, 810-813.
13. Dunning, J.B. Jr (2007). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, 2nd edn.. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
14. Ellison, A.M., Bank, M.S., Clinton, B.D., Colburn, E.A., Elliott, K., Ford, C.R. et al. (2005). Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ., 3, 479-486.
15. Fewster, R.M., Buckland, S.T., Siriwardena, G.M., Baillie, S.R. & Wilson, J.D. (2000). Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalized additive models. Ecology, 81, 1970-1984.
16. Fox, A.D. (2004). Has Danish agriculture maintained farmland bird populations? J. Appl. Ecol., 41, 427-439.
17. Gangoso, L., Agudo, R., Anadon, J.D., de la Riva, M., Suleyman, A.S., Porter, R. et al. (2013). Reinventing mutualism between humans and wild fauna: insights from vultures as ecosystem service providers. Conserv. Lett., 6, 172-179.
18. Gaston, K.J. (1994). Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London.
19. Gaston, K.J. (2008). Biodiversity and extinction: the importance of being common. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 32, 73-79.
20. Gaston, K.J. (2010). Valuing common species. Science, 327, 154-155.
21. Gaston, K.J. (2011). Common ecology. Bioscience, 61, 354-362.
22. Gaston, K.J. & Fuller, R.A. (2007). Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 14-19.
23. Geider, R.J., Delucia, E.H., Falkowski, P.G., Finzi, A.C., Grime, J.P., Grace, J. et al. (2001). Primary productivity of planet Earth: biological determinants and physical constraints in terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Glob. Change Biol., 7, 849-882.
24. Gelman, A., Su, Y.S., Yajima, M., Hill, J., Pittau, M.G., Kerman, J. et al. (2013). Arm: data analysis using regression and multi- level/hierarchical models. R package, version 1.6-09. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arm. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
25. Gregory, R.D. & van Strien, A. (2010). Wild bird indicators: using composite population trends of birds as measures of environmental health. Ornithol. Sci., 9, 3-22.
26. Gregory, R.D., Noble, D., Field, R., Marchant, J., Raven, M. & Gibbons, D.W. (2003). Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungar., 12-13, 12-24.
27. Gregory, R.D., van Strien, A., Vorisek, P., Gmelig, A.W., Noble, D.G., Foppen, R.P.B. et al. (2005). Developing indicators for European birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 360, 269-288.
28. Grime, J.P. (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate filter and founder effects. J. Ecol., 86, 902-910.
29. Grueber, C.E., Nakagawa, S., Laws, R.J. & Jamieson, I.G. (2011). Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol., 24, 699-711.
30. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive (2013). Available at: http://www.hbw.com/. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
31. Henderson, P.A. & Magurran, A.E. (2010). Linking species abundance distributions in numerical abundance and biomass through simple assumptions about community structure. Proc. Biol. Sci., 277, 1561-1570.
32. Hoffman, M. et al. (2010). The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science, 330, 1503-1509.
33. Holling, M. & Rare Breeding Birds Panel (2011). Rare breeding birds in the United Kingdom 2009. Br. Birds, 104, 476-537.
34. Hudson, L.N., Isaac, N.J.B. & Reuman, D.C. (2013). The relationship between body mass and field metabolic rate among individual birds and mammals. J. Anim. Ecol., 82, 1009-1020.
35. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B. & Christensen, R.H.B. (2013) LmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package, version 2.0-3. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
36. Lindenmayer, D.B., Wood, J.T., McBurney, L., MacGregor, C., Youngentob, K. & Banks, S.C. (2011). How to make a common species rare: a case against conservation complacency. Biol. Conserv., 144, 1663-1672.
37. Male, T.D. & Bean, M.J. (2005). Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation. Ecol. Lett., 8, 986-992.
38. McGill, B.J., Etienne, R.S., Gray, J.S., Alonso, D., Anderson, M.J., Kassa Benecha, H., et al. (2007). Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett., 10, 995-1015.
39. Moorcroft, D., Whittingham, M.J., Bradbury, R.B. & Wilson, J.D. (2002). The selection of stubble fields by wintering granivorous birds reflects vegetation cover and food abundance. J. Appl. Ecol., 39, 535-547.
40. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effect models. Methods Ecol. Evol., 4, 133-142.
41. R Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Last accessed 21 February 2014.
42. Richards, S.A. (2008). Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology. J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 218-227.
43. Satterthwaite, F.E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics, 2, 110-114.
44. Schielzeth, H. (2010). Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol., 1, 103-113.
45. Sekercioglu, C.H., Daily, G. & Ehrlich, P.R. (2004). Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 263-267.
46. Smith, H.G., Ryegard, A. & Svensson, S. (2012). Is the large-scale decline of the starling related to local changes in demography? Ecography, 35, 741-748.
47. Snow, D.W. & Perrins, C.M. (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Concise edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
48. Wenny, D.G., DeVault, T.L., Johnson, M.D., Kelly, D., Sekercioglu, C.H., Tomback, D.F. et al. (2011). The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. Auk, 128, 1-14.
49. Whelan, C.J., Wenny, D.G. & Marquis, R.J. (2008). Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1134, 25-60.
50. Wretenberg, J., Lindström, Å., Svensson, S., Thierfelder, T. & Pärt, T. (2006). Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 1110-1120.