The foundation of the child's right to an open future

Journal of Social Philosophy

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 522-538

  Millum, Joseph ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916606583     PISSN: 00472786     EISSN: 14679833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/josp.12076     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 13.
2. Joel Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to an Open Future,; in Whose Child?, ed.W. Aiken and H. LaFollette (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1980), 124-53.
3. Joel Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 325-26.
4. A. Hasman and Søren Holm, ;Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine: Is There a Right to a Smoking Future?; Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2004): 344-45;
5. Loretta Kopelman, ;Using the Best Interests Standard to Decide Whether to Test Children for Untreatable, Late-Onset Genetic Diseases,; Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32, no. 4 (2007): 375-94;
6. Rui Nunes, ;Ethical Dimension of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation,; Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22, no. 4 (2001): 337-49;
7. Alan Buchanan, DanW. Brock, Norman Daniels, and DanielWikler, From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 170-5.
8. Dena Davis, ;Genetic Dilemmas and the Child's Right to an Open Future,; Hastings Center Report 27, no. 2 (1997): 7-15;
9. Dena Davis, Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children's Futures (New York: Routledge, 2001), 24;
10. Mianna Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and the Child's Right to an Open Future,; Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 4 (2006): 537-51.
11. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966. Retrieved December 26, 2013, from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx).
12. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 125-26.
13. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 126.
14. Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and Child's Right to Open Future,; 537-38.
15. Richard J. Arneson and Ian Shapiro, ;Democratic Autonomy and Religious Freedom:ACritique of Wisconsin v. Yoder,; in Nomos XXXVIII: Political Order, ed. Ian Shapiro and Russell Hardin (New York: New York University Press, 1996), 365-411.
16. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 130, emphasis added.
17. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 134-35.
18. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 126, emphasis added.
19. Buchanan et al., From Chance to Choice, 175.
20. Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and Child's Right to Open Future,; 547.
21. David Archard and Colin M. Macleod (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 142-59, 156.
22. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 126.
23. Davis, Genetic Dilemmas, 9.
24. United Nations, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, retrieved December 26, 2013, from ttp://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.
25. United Nations, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17.
26. the debate between Lotz (2006) and Claudia Mills, ;The Child's Right to an Open Future?; Journal of Social Philosophy 34, no. 4 (2003): 499-509.
27. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 125-26.
28. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 127.
29. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 127.
30. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 127.
31. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 130.
32. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 145.
33. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 150.)
34. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 150.
35. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 149.
36. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 133.
37. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 140
38. Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and Child's Right to Open Future,; 541-43.
39. Mills, ;The Child's Right to an Open Future?; 500
40. Feinberg, ;The Child's Right to Open Future,; 136.
41. Robert Cialdini, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, revised ed. (NewYork: Quill, 1993).
42. Amulya Mandava and Joseph Millum, ;Manipulation in the Enrollment of Research Participants,; Hastings Center Report 43, no. 2 [2013]: 38-47.
43. Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and Child's Right to Open Future,; 543.
44. Lotz, ;Feinberg, Mills, and Child's Right to Open Future,; 537.
45. However, when she works out what the negative and positive aspects of the right are, she does not return to Feinberg's methodology; instead, she draws on quite distinct arguments by Joseph Raz and Tamar Schapiro that concern helping others to develop the capacity for autonomous action (e.g., 547-49).