Influence of weak labels for emotion recognition of tweets

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8891, Issue , 2014, Pages 108-118

  Janssens, Olivier ^a   Verstockt, Steven ^a   Mannens, Erik ^a   Van Hoecke, Sofie ^a   Van De Walle, Rik ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Annotation; Crowdsourcing; Emotion recognition; Twitter

Indexed keywords

CROWDSOURCING;

ALGORITHM DESIGN; ANNOTATION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; EMOTION RECOGNITION; FEATURE ENGINEERINGS; TWITTER; WEAK LABELS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 84915821269     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13817-6_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Lovins, J.B.: Development of a stemming algorithm. Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics 11, 22–31 (1968)
2. Bergamo, A., Torresani, L.: Exploiting weakly-labeled web images to improve object classification: a domain adaptation approach. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, 181–189 (2010)
3. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Pepe, A.: Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In: ICWSM, pp. 450–453 (2011)
4. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.: Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science 2(1), 1–8 (2011)
5. Calix, R.A., Mallepudi, S.A., Chen, B.C.B., Knapp, G.M.: Emotion Recognition in Text for 3-D Facial Expression Rendering. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 12(6), 544–551 (2010)
6. Chaffar, S., Inkpen, D.: Using a heterogeneous dataset for emotion analysis in text. In: Butz, C., Lingras, P. (eds.) Canadian AI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6657, pp. 62–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
7. Ekman, P.: Basic emotions. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, vol. 98. John Wiley & Sons (1999)
8. Janssens, O., Slembrouck, M., Verstockt, S., Hoecke, S.V., Walle, R.V.D.: Realtime Emotion Classification of Tweets. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 1430–1431 (2013)
9. Kaufman, S., Rosset, S.: Leakage in data mining: Formulation, detection, and avoidance. In: 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 556–563 (2012)
10. Mohammad, S.: #Emotional Tweets. In: First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, pp. 246–255. Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal (2012)
11. Paice, C., Husk, G.: Another Stemmer. ACM SIGIR Forum 24, 56–61 (1990)
12. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011)
13. Roberts, K., Roach, M.A., Johnson, J.: EmpaTweet: Annotating and Detecting Emotions on Twitter. In: LREC, pp. 3806–3813 (2012)
14. Rui, H., Whinston, A.: Designing a social-broadcasting-based business intelligence system. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 2(4) (2011)
15. Suttles, J., Ide, N.: Distant supervision for emotion classification with discrete binary values. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7817, pp. 121–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
16. Wang, A., Hoang, C., Kan, M.: Perspectives on crowdsourcing annotations for natural language processing. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(1), 9–31 (2013)
17. Wang, W., Chen, L., Thirunarayan, K., Sheth, A.P.: Harnessing Twitter “Big Data” for Automatic Emotion Identification. In: 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, pp. 587–592 (2012)
18. Willett, P.: The Porter stemming algorithm: then and now (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00330330610681295