Development of a complex bone tissue culture system based on cellulose nanowhisker mechanical strain

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 123, Issue , 2014, Pages 838-844

  Kim, Dae Seung ^a   Jung, Sang Myung ^a   Yoon, Gwang Heum ^a   Lee, Hoo Cheol ^a   Shin, Hwa Sung ^a  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bone tissue engineering; CNW; Mechanical stress; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

BONE; CELL DEATH; CELLULOSE; NANOWHISKERS; OSTEOBLASTS; TISSUE; TISSUE CULTURE;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CELLULOSE NANOWHISKERS; MECHANICAL STRAIN; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOBLAST GROWTH; SULFURIC ACID HYDROLYSIS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

CALCIUM ION; SULFURIC ACID;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TISSUE; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; CELL ADHESION; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL STIMULATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLULOSE NANOWHISKER; CYTOTOXICITY; HYDROLYSIS; INTEGUMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; RAT; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; SURVIVAL RATE; TISSUE CULTURE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UROCHORDATA;

EID: 84915771201     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: 18734367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Buckwalter J.A., Cooper R.R. Bone structure and function. AAOS INSTR COURS LECT 1987, 36:27-48.
2. Marks S.C., Popoff S.N. Bone cell biology: the regulation of development, structure, and function in the skeleton. Am. J. Anat. 1988, 183:1-44.
3. Doblare M., Garcia J.M., Gomez M.J. Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2004, 71:1809-1840.
4. Landry P.S., Marino A.A., Sadasivan K.K., Albright J.A. Bone injury response. An animal model for testing theories of regulation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996, 260-273.
5. Mills L.A., Simpson A.H. In vivo models of bone repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2012, 94:865-874.
6. Rezwan K., Chen Q.Z., Blaker J.J., Boccaccini A.R. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27:3413-3431.
7. Kerr R.G., Kerr S.S. Marine natural products as therapeutic agents. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 1999, 9:1207-1222.
8. Eichhorn S.J. Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 2011, 7:303-315.
9. Habibi Y., Lucia L.A., Rojas O.J. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110:3479-3500.
10. Ji B.H., Gao H.J. Mechanical properties of nanostructure of biological materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2004, 52:1963-1990.
11. Smith I.O., Liu X.H., Smith L.A., Ma P.X. Nanostructured polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Wires Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2009, 1:226-236.
12. Li X.M., Wang L., Fan Y.B., Feng Q.L., Cui F.Z., Watari F. Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 101A:2424-2435.
13. Dugan J.M., Gough J.E., Eichhorn S.J. Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine 2013, 8:287-298.
14. Dugan J.M., Gough J.E., Eichhorn S.J. Directing the morphology and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells using oriented cellulose nanowhiskers. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:2498-2504.
15. Dugan J.M., Collins R.F., Gough J.E., Eichhorn S.J. Oriented surfaces of adsorbed cellulose nanowhiskers promote skeletal muscle myogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9:4707-4715.
16. Rusli R., Shanmuganathan K., Rowan S.J., Weder C., Eichhorn S.J. Stress transfer in cellulose nanowhisker composites-influence of whisker aspect ratio and surface charge. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:1363-1369.
17. Kaunas R., Nguyen P., Usami S., Chien S. Cooperative effects of Rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:15895-15900.
18. Bakker A.D., Klein-Nulend J. Osteoblast isolation from murine calvaria and long bones. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 816:19-29.
19. Iwamoto S., Kai W.H., Isogai A., Iwata T. Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:2571-2576.
20. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S., Nishiyama Y., Putaux J.L., Heux L., Dubreuil F., Rochas C. The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:57-65.
21. Chengjun Z.Q.W. Recent development in applications of cellulose nanocrystals for advanced polymer-based nanocomposites by novel fabrication strategies. InTech 2012, 103-120.
22. Huang J.L., Gray D.G., Li C.J. A(3)-coupling catalyzed by robust Au nanoparticles covalently bonded to HS-functionalized cellulose nanocrystalline films. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9:1388-1396.
23. Heo L.E., Matsumoto Y.J., Shimoyama I K. Stretchable substrates for the measurement of intracellular calcium ion concentration responding to mechanical stress. MEMS 2009, 68-71.
24. Tang L.L., Wang Y.L., Gu L., Cai S.X., Su A.H. Physiological responses of osteoblasts to cyclic stretching and the change of intracellular calcium concentration. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2003, 48:346-350.
25. Ralston S.H. Bone structure and metabolism. Medicine 2009, 37:469-474.
26. Anderson H.C. Mechanism of mineral formation in bone. Lab. Invest. 1989, 60:320-330.