Description of pedestrian crashes in accordance with characteristics of Active Safety Systems

2014 IRCOBI Conference Proceedings - International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 746-758

  Hamdane, H ^a,b   Serre, T ^c   Anderson, R ^b   Masson, C ^a   Yerpez, J ^c  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

Crash modeling; Crash reconstruction; Pedestrian active safety; Pedestrian crashes; Primary safety systems

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS; SECURITY SYSTEMS; VEHICLES;

ACTIVE SAFETY; CRASH INVESTIGATION; CRASH MODELING; CRASH RECONSTRUCTION; ISSUES AND CHALLENGES; PEDESTRIAN CRASHES; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; SAFETY POTENTIAL;

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY;

EID: 84915746142     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. WHO, Global status report on road safety, WHO, 2013.
2. Brenac T, Nachtergaële C, Reigner H. Scenarios types d'accidents impliquant des piétons et éléments pour leur prévention, 2004, INRETS.
3. Hutchinson P, Lindsay VLA. Pedestrian and cyclist crashes in the Adelaide Metropolitan Area, Centre for Automotive Safety Research, 2009.
4. Broggi A, Cerri P, Ghidoni S., Grisleri P, Ho Gi Jung. A New Approach to Urban Pedestrian Detection for Automatic Braking. Intell. Transp. Syst. IEEE Trans. On, 2009, 10(4):594-605.
5. Keller CG, Thao D, Fritz H., Joos A, Rabe C, Gavrila DM. Active Pedestrian Safety by Automatic Braking and Evasive Steering. Intell. Transp. Syst. IEEE Trans. On, 2011, 12(4):1292-1304.
6. Coelingh E, Eidehall A, Bengtsson M. Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection - a practical example of Automatic Emergency Braking. Intell. Transp. Syst. ITSC 2010, 13th Int. IEEE Conf. On, p. 155-160.
7. Gandhi T, Trivedi MM. Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, Survey, and Challenges. Intell. Transp. Syst. IEEE, 2007, 8(3):413-430.
8. Meinecke MM, Obojski MA, Töns M, Dehesa M. SAVE-U: First Experiences with a Pre-Crash System for Enhancing Pedestrian Safety. Intelligent Transportation Systems and Services, 2005, Hanover, Germany.
9. Eckert A, Hohm A, Lueke S. An integrated ADAS solution for pedestrian collision avoidance. The 23rd Enhancement Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2013, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
10. Yuasa H, Nakanishi M, Mochida T., Yamada N, Nakai M. Research into evaluation method for pedestrian pre-collision system. The 23rd Enhancement Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2013, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
11. Girard Y. In-depth investigation of accidents: the experience of INRETS at Salon de Provence. The 6th ICTCT congress, 1993, Salzburg, Austria.
12. Woolley J, Kloeden C, Lindsay V., Ponte G, McLean A. The Adelaide metropolitan indepth crash investigation study 2002-2005. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, 2006, Gold Coast, Australia.
13. Huang S, Yang J, Eklund F. Evaluation of remote pedestrian sensor system based on the analysis of car-pedestrian accident scenarios. Saf. Sci., 2008, 46(9):1345-1355.
14. McLean J, Anderson RWG, Farmer MJB, Lee BH, Brooks CG. Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian collisions, Federal Office of Road Safety, Transport and Communications, 1994.
15. Serre T, Bohn M, Llari M., Cavallero C, Perrin FC. Detailed investigation and reconstructions of real accidents involving vulnerable road users. Berichte BASt - Unterreihe Fahrzeugtechnik, no 55, 2005.
16. Subaru Australia, « EyeSight™ Principle Of Operation ». Internet: http://www.subaru.com.au/about/eyesight/eyesight-principle-of-operation, April 2014.
17. Michalke TP, Jebens A, Schafers L. A dynamic approach for ensuring the functional reliability of next-generation driver assistance systems, Intell. Transp. Syst. ITSC 2011 14th Int. IEEE Conf. On, 2011, p. 408-415.
18. Hayashi H, Inomata R, Fujishiro R., Ouchi Y, Suzuki K, Nanami T. Development of pre-crash safety system with pedestrian collision avoidance assist, The 23rd Enhancement Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2013, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
19. Reed WS, Keskin AT. Vehicular Deceleration and Its Relationship to Friction. SAE International, SAE Technical Paper 890736, 1989, Warrendale, PA.
20. Rosén E, Sander U. Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2009, 41(3):536-542.
21. Lenard J, Danton R, Avery M., Weekes A, Zuby D, Kühn M. Typical pedestrian accident scenarios for the testing of autonomous emergency braking systems, The 22nd Enhancement Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2011, Washington DC, USA.
22. Wisch M, Seiniger P, et al. European project AsPeCSS - interim result: Development of test scenarios based on identified accident scenarios, The 23rd Enhancement Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2013, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
23. Keller CG, Hermes C, Gavrila DM. Will the pedestrian cross? Probabilistic path prediction based on learned motion features. Pattern Recognition, 2011, p. 386-395.
24. Hayashi R, Isogai J, Raksincharoensak P., Nagai M. Autonomous collision avoidance system by combined control of steering and braking using geometrically optimised vehicular trajectory. Veh. Syst. Dyn., 2012, 50(Supp.):151-168.